Elliptical field-of-view PROPELLER imaging

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 808-814

  Devaraj, Ajit ^a,b   Pipe, James G ^b  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b BARROW NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Elliptical FOV; Nonuniform angular sampling; PROPELLER

Indexed keywords

OPTICAL TRANSFER FUNCTION; PHANTOMS; PROPELLERS;

ANGULAR SAMPLING; CLOSED FORM SOLUTIONS; DATA RECONSTRUCTION; ELLIPTICAL FOV; ELONGATED OBJECTS; FIELD OF VIEWS; IN-VIVO IMAGES; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SCAN;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ARTICLE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING; IN VIVO STUDY; PHANTOM; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 69449097889     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22006     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Hu X, Parrish T. Reduction of field of view for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:691-694. (Pubitemid 24166826)
2. Yao L, Cao Y, Levin DN. 2D Locally focused MRI: applications to dynamic and spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:834-846. (Pubitemid 26396811)
3. Scheffler K, Hennig J. Reduced circular field-of-view imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:474-480.
4. Scheffler K. Tomographic imaging with nonuniform angular sampling. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:162-166. (Pubitemid 29095488)
5. Larson PEZ, Gurney PT, Nishimura DG. Anisotropic field-of-views in radial imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008;27:47-57.
6. King KF. Spiral scanning with anisotropic field of view. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:448-456.
7. Larson PEZ, Nishimura DG. Anisotropic field-of-views for PROPELLER MRI. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Berlin, Germany, 2007. (abstract 1726).
8. Pipe JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: Application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Mag Reson Med 1999;42:963-969.
9. Ramanujan S. Modular equations and approximations to Pi. Q J Math (Oxford) 1914;45:350-372.
10. Robison RK, Pipe JG. Analysis and refinement of PROPELLER MRI motion correction. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Berlin, Germany, 2007. (abstract 1731).
11. Jackson JI, Meyer CH, Nishimura DG. Selections of a convolution function for fourier inversion using gridding. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:473-478.
12. Pipe JG, Menon P. Sampling density compensation in MRI: rationale and an iterative numerical solution. Mag Reson Med 1999;41:179-186. (Pubitemid 29068051)
13. Firbank MJ, Coulthard A, Harrison RM, Williams ED. A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images. Phys Med Biol 1999;44:N261-N264.