Selection in a field experiment with voluntary participation

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 63-84

  Gautier, Pieter A ^a   Klaauw, Bas van der ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856030200     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: 10991255     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.1184     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Azar OH. 2003. The implications of tipping for economics and management, International Journal of Social Economics 30: 1084-1094.
2. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G. 2006. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters 2: 412-414.
3. Bellemare C, Shearer B. 2009. Gift exchange and worker productivity: evidence from a firm level experiment. Games and Economic Behavior 67: 233-244.
4. Belot M, Duch R, Miller L. 2009. Who should be called to the lab: a comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. Mimeo, Oxford University.
5. Bénabou R, Tirole J. 2006. Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review 96: 1652-1678.
6. Benz M, Meier S. 2008. Do people behave in experiments as in the field? Evidence from donations. Experimental Economics 11: 268-281.
7. Camerer CF. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Russel Sage Foundation: New York.
8. Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M. 2003. Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
9. Carpenter J, Connolly C, Knowles Myers C. 2008. Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment. Experimental Economics 11: 282-298.
10. Dyer D, Kagel JH, Levin D. 1989. A comparison of naive and experienced bidders in common value offer auctions: a laboratory analysis. Economic Journal 99: 108-115.
11. Eckel CC, Grossman PJ. 2000. Volunteers and pseudo-volunteers: the effect of recruitment method in dictator experiments. Experimental Economics 3: 107-120.
12. Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A. 1998. Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets. European Economic Review 42: 1-34.
13. Gneezy U. 2009. Name-your-own-price: on social preferences in markets. Mimeo, University of California, San Diego.
14. Gneezy U, List JA. 2006. Putting behavioral economics to work: testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74: 1365-1384.
15. Harrison G, List JA. 2004. Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature 42: 1009-1055.
16. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-291.
17. Köszegi B, Rabin M. 2006. A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 1133-1165.
18. Krupka E, Croson R. 2008. Somebody's watching: the impact of being observed on cooperation in a field setting. Mimeo, University of Texas, Dallas.
19. Lazear E, Malmendier U, Weber R. 2005. Sorting in experiments. Mimeo, Stanford Business School.
20. Levitt SD, List JA. 2007. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 155-174.
21. Milinsky M, Semmann D, Krambeck HJ. 2002. Reputation helps solve the tragedy of the commons. Nature 393: 573-577.
22. Parrett M. 2006. An analysis of the determinants of tipping behavior: a laboratory experiment and evidence from restaurant tipping. Southern Economic Journal 73: 489-514.
23. Ruffle BJ. 1996. More is better, but fair is fair: tipping in dictator and ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior 23: 247-265.
24. Soetevent AR. 2005. Anonymity in giving in a natural context: a field experiment in 30 churches. Journal of Public Economics 89: 2301-2323.
25. Thaler RH. 1980. Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39-60.
26. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-1130.