Emerging search regimes: Measuring co-evolutions among research, science, and society

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 51-67

  Heimeriks, Gaston ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

biotechnology; dynamics of knowledge; genomics; nanotechnology; search regime

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; GENOMICS; KNOWLEDGE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SELF ORGANIZATION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84855982131     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2012.643562     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Asheim, B., R.A. Boschma, P. Cooke, A. Dahlstrand-Lindholm, P. Laredo, and A. Piccauga. 2006. Constructing regional advantage. Principles, perspectives, policies. May, DG Research, European Commission, Brussels, p. 1-90.
2. Bonaccorsi, A. 2008. Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Minerva, 46: 285-315.
3. Bonaccorsi, A. and Thoma, G. 2007. Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology. Research Policy, 36: 813-31.
4. Boschma, R. A. and Frenken, K. 2010. "The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective". In Handbook of evolutionary economic geography, Edited by: Boschma, R. A. and Martin, R. 120-35. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. chap. 5
5. Cowan, R., and G. Van de Paal. 2000. Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy. DG Enterprise, European Commission, Luxembourg.
6. De Solla Price Derek. 1986. Little science, big science and beyond, New York: Columbia University Press.
7. Dolfsma, W. and Leydesdorff, L. 2009. Lock-in & break-out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76: 932-41.
8. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Introduction to the special 'triple helix' issue. Research Policy, 29: 109-123.
9. Foray, D. 2006. Globalization of R&D. Expert Group Knowledge for Growth, European Commission, Brussels.
10. Frenken, K., Hardeman, S. and Hoekman, J. 2009. Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3: 222-32.
11. Fujigaki, Y. 1998. Filling the gap between the discussion on science and scientist's everyday's activity: Applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge. Social Science Information, 37: 5-22.
12. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartz, S. and Trow, M. 1994. The new production of knowledge, London: Sage.
13. Grupp, H. 1990. The concept of entropy in scientometrics and innovation research. Scientometrics, 18: 219-39.
14. Heimeriks, G. 2009. Governing science as a complex adaptive system. Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series. Utrecht University, Utrecht.
15. Heimeriks, G. and Vasileiadou, E. 2008. Changes or transition? Analysing the use of ICTs in sciences. Social Science Information, 47: 5-29.
16. Hicks, D. M. and Katz, J. S. 1996. Where is science going?. Science Technology and Human Values, 21: 379-406.
17. Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19. Leydesdorff, L. 1989. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research Policy, 18: 209-23.
20. Leydesdorff, L. 2006. The knowledge-based economy. Modeled, measured, simulated, Boca Raton, Fl: Universal Publishers.
21. Leydesdorff, L. 2010. The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens' 'Structuration Theory' and Luhmann's 'Self-Organization'. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 10: 2138-50.
22. Leydesdorff, L. and Cozzens, S. E. 1993. "The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the Science Citation Index". In Scientometrics Vol. 26, 133-54.
23. Leydesdorff, L. and Heimeriks, G. 2001. The self-organization of the European information society: The case of "Biotechnology". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 5214: 1262-74.
24. Leydesdorff, L. and Persson, O. 2010. Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 618: 1622-1634.
25. Leydesdorff, L. and Schank, T. 2008. Dynamic animations of journal maps: Indicators of structural change and interdisciplinary developments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59: 1810-18.
26. Lucio-Arias, D. and Leydesdorff, L. 2009. The dynamics of exchanges and references among scientific texts, and the autopoiesis of discursive knowledge. Journal of Informetrics, 3: 261-71.
27. Nelson, R. 1994. The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 47-63.
28. Nowotny, S., Scott, J. and Gibbons, M. 2001. Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
29. OECD. 1996. Economic outlook, Paris: OECD.
30. OECD. 2005. Internationalisation of R&D: Trends, issues and implications for S&T policies. Background Report for the Forum on the Internationalization of R&D OECD-Belgian Science Policy. Brussels: OECD.
31. OECD. 2009. Science, technology and industry scoreboard, Paris: OECD.
32. Persson, O., Glänzel, W. and Danell, R. 2004. Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60: 421-32.
33. Propp, T. and Moors, E. H.M. 2009. Will genomics erode public health and prevention? A scenario of unintended consequences in the Netherlands. Science and Public Policy, 36: 199-213.
34. Rip, A. 1990. "An exercise in foresight: The research system in transition". In The research system in transition, Edited by: Cozzens, S. E. 387-401. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Rip, A. 2002. "Science for the 21st century". In The future of the sciences and humanities, Edited by: Tindemans, P., Verrijn-Stuart, A. and Visser, R. 99-148. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
36. Simon, H. 1973. "The organization of complex systems". In Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems, Edited by: Pattee, H. H. 3-27. New York: George Braziller.
37. Saviotti, P. P. 1996. Technological evolution, variety and the economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
38. Theil, H. 1972. Statistical decomposition analysis, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
39. Van den Besselaar, P. and Heimeriks, G. 2006. Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 68: 377-93.
40. Wagner, C. S. 2008. The new invisible college, Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
41. Webster, F. 2006. "The information society revisited". In The handbook of new media. social shaping and social consequences of ICTs, Edited by: Lievrouw, L. A. and Livingston, S. 443-57. London: Sage. Updated stud.
42. Whitley, R. 2000. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.