Modifying the rebound: It depends! Explaining mobility behavior on the basis of the German socio-economic panel

Energy Policy

Volumn 41, Issue , 2012, Pages 29-35

  Matiaske, Wenzel ^a   Menges, Roland ^b   Spiess, Martin ^c  

^a HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CLAUSTHAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fuel consumption; Panel studies; Rebound effect

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; EMPIRICAL LITERATURE; FUEL EFFICIENCY; IN-LINE; MOBILITY BEHAVIOR; PANEL MODEL; PANEL STUDIES; RANDOM EFFECTS; REBOUND EFFECT; SOCIO-ECONOMICS; THEORETICAL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION SECTOR;

DIESEL ENGINES; FUEL CONSUMPTION;

FUELS;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; DIESEL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MARKET; FUEL CONSUMPTION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MOBILITY; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

GERMANY;

EID: 84855926882     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.044     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allan G., Gilmartin M., McGregor P.G., Swales J.K., Turner J. Modelling the economy-wide rebound effect. Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption 2009, 69-98. Palgrave and MacMillan, Basingstoke. H. Herring, S. Sorrell (Eds.).
2. Baltagi B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
3. Bühler R., Kunert U. Trends and Determinants of Travel Behavior in the USA and in Germany. DIW Berlin, Abteilung Energie 2008, Verkehr, Umwelt, Germany.
4. Brookes L.G. Communications. The greenhouse effect: fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy Policy. 1990, 18(2):199-201.
5. Cerri V., Hivert L. De nouveaux Nouveaux Diésélistes? 2003, Arcueil-INRETS, Paris.
6. Chen, B., Sperling, D., 2004. Analysis of auto industry and consumer response to regulations and technological change, and customization of consumer response models in support of AB 1493 rulemaking, Case study of light-duty vehicles in Europe. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
7. Dahl C.A. Gasoline demand survey. Energy Journal. 1986, 71(1):67-82.
8. Dargay, J., Hanly, M., Madre, J.-L., Hivert, L., Chlond, B., 2003. Demotorisation seen through panel surveys: a comparison of France, Britain and Germany. Conference Paper for the 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, 10-15 August 2003.
9. DIW Verkehr in Zahlen. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin 2002, Deutscher Verkehrs-Verlag, Hamburg.
10. Frondel, M., Peters, J., Vance, C., 2007. Identifying the rebound: theoretical issues and empirical evidence from a German household panel. RWI Discussion Paper, no. 57, Essen, Germany.
11. Goodwin P., Dargay J., Hanly M. Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: a review. Transport Reviews 2004, 24(3):275-292.
12. Greene, D.L., 1997. Theory and empirical estimates of the rebound effect for the U.S. Transportation Sector, Center for Transportation Analysis. Oak Ridge, TN.
13. Greene, D.L., Kahn, J., Gibson, R., 1998. Estimating the rebound effect for household vehicles in the U.S. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
14. Greening L.A., Greene D.L., Difiglio C. Energy efficiency and consumption - the rebound effect - a survey. Energy Policy 2000, 28:389-401.
15. Greening, L.A., Khrusch, M., 1996. Modeling the process of technological innovation and diffusion: an overview of issues. White Paper, Climate Policies and Programs Division in the Office of Economy and Environment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC.
16. Harrison, D.G., Leonard, B., Reddy, D., Radov, D., Klevnas, P., Patchett, P., Reschke, P., 2005. Review of studies evaluating the impacts of motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions regulations in California. National Economic Research Associates, Boston.
17. Hivert L. Les Nouveaux Dieselistes 1994, Arcueil-INRETS, Paris.
18. Hughes, J.E., Knittel, C.R., Sperling, D., 2006. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. Working Paper, Institute for Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
19. Hymel, K.M., Small, K.A., Van Dender, K., 2010. Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California.
20. Khazzoom J.D. Economic implications of mandated efficiency standards for households appliances. Energy Journal 1980, 10(1):21-40.
21. Litman, T., 2010. Changing vehicle travel price sensitivities: the rebounding rebound effect. Paper for Submission to the 90th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Paper 11-2474. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, Canada.
22. Schipper L., Fulton L. Disappointed by diesel? The impact of the shift to diesels in Europe through 2006. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2009, 2139:1-10.
23. 2 emission implications. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2002, 36(2):305-340.
24. Small, K.A., Van Dender, K., 2005. A study to evaluate the effect of reduced greenhouse gas emissions on vehicle miles travelled. Study prepared for the California Energy Commission, Final Report ARB 02-336, Department of Economics.
25. Small K.A., Van Dender K. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. Energy Journal. 2007, 28(1):25-51.
26. Sorrel S. The evidence for direct rebound effects. Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption 2009, 23-46. Palgrave and MacMillan, Basingstoke. H. Herring, S. Sorrell (Eds.).
27. Sorrel, S., Dimitripoulos, J., 2007. UK ERC review of evidence for the rebound effect: Technical Report 3: Econometric Studies. UK Energy Research Center, London.
28. Sorrel S., Herring H. Introduction to energy efficiency and sustainable consumption. Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption 2009, 1-19. Palgrave and MacMillan, Basingstoke. H. Herring, S. Sorrell (Eds.).
29. 2 emission benefit of diesel (versus gasoline) powered vehicles. Science & Technology. 2004, 38(12):3217-3223.
30. Verboven F. Quality-based price discrimination and tax incidence: evidence from gasoline and diesel cars. Rand Journal of Economics 2002, 33(2):275-297.
31. Wirl F. The Economics of Conservation Programs 1997, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.