Transformation-tolerant object recognition in rats revealed by visual priming

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 21-34

  Tafazoli, Sina ^a   di Filippo, Alessandro ^a   Zoccolan, Davide ^a  

^a SISSA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; LONG EVANS RAT; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; RECOGNITION;

ANIMALS; FORM PERCEPTION; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, ANIMAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84855925875     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3932-11.2012     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Afraz A, Cavanagh P (2009) The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. J Vis 9:10, 1-17.
2. Afraz SR, Cavanagh P (2008) Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vision Res 48:42-54.
3. Ashbridge E, Perrett DI (1998) Generalizing across object orientation and size In: Perceptual constancy. (Walsh V, Kulikowski J, eds), pp 192-209. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
4. Bar M, Biederman I (1998) Subliminal visual priming. Psychol Sci 9:464-468.
5. Bar M, Biederman I (1999) Localizing the cortical region mediating visual awareness of object identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:1790-1793.
6. Biederman I, Cooper EE (1991) Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 20:585-593.
7. Biederman I, Cooper EE (1992) Size invariance in visual object priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:121-133.
8. Bülthoff HH, Edelman SY, Tarr MJ (1995) How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cereb Cortex 5:247-260.
9. Clifford CWG, Rhodes G (2005) Fitting the mind to the world: adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision. New York: Oxford UP.
10. Coogan TA, Burkhalter A (1993) Hierarchical organization of areas in rat visual cortex. J Neurosci 13:3749-3772.
11. DiCarlo JJ, Cox DD (2007) Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci 11:333-341.
12. Edelman S (1999) Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
13. Espinoza SG, Thomas HC (1983) Retinotopic organization of striate and extrastriate visual cortex in the hooded rat. Brain Res 272:137-144.
14. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC (1991) Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1:1-47.
15. Gao E, DeAngelis GC, Burkhalter A (2010) Parallel input channels to mouse primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 30:5912-5926.
16. Girman SV, Sauve Y, Lund RD (1999) Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 82:301-311.
17. Kaliukhovich DA, Vogels R (2011) Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 21:1547-1558.
18. Kohn A, Movshon JA (2004) Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nat Neurosci 7:764-772.
19. Kravitz DJ, Vinson LD, Baker CI (2008) How position dependent is visual object recognition? Trends Cogn Sci 12:114-122.
20. Kravitz DJ, Kriegeskorte N, Baker CI (2010) High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. Cereb Cortex 20:2916-2925.
21. Lawson R (1999) Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychol (Amst) 102:221-245.
22. Lee AK, Manns ID, Sakmann B, Brecht M (2006) Whole-cell recordings in freely moving rats. Neuron 51:399-407.
23. Leopold DA, O'Toole AJ, Vetter T, Blanz V (2001) Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat Neurosci 4:89-94.
24. Leopold DA, Bondar IV, Giese MA (2006) Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 442:572-575.
25. Li L, Miller EK, Desimone R (1993) The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 69:1918-1929.
26. Liu Y, Murray SO, Jagadeesh B (2009) Time course and stimulus Dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 101:418-436.
27. Logothetis NK, Sheinberg DL (1996) Visual object recognition. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:577-621.
28. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Bulthoff HH, Poggio T (1994) View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Curr Biol 4:401-414.
29. McMahon DBT, Olson CR (2007) Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: relation to behavioral priming. J Neurophysiol 97:3532-3543.
30. Meier P, Flister E, Reinagel P (2011) Collinear features impair visual detection by rats. J Vis 11:22, 1-16.
31. Minini L, Jeffery KJ (2006) Do rats use shape to solve "shape discriminations"? Learn Mem 13:287-297.
32. Miyashita Y (1993) Inferior temporal cortex: where visual perception meets memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 16:245-263.
33. Müller K-M, Wilke M, Leopold DA (2009) Visual adaptation to convexity in macaque area V4. Neuroscience 161:655-662.
34. Niell CM, Stryker MP (2008) Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci 28:7520-7536.
35. Niell CM, Stryker MP (2010) Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex. Neuron 65:472-479.
36. Orban GA (2008) Higher order visual processing in macaque extrastriate cortex. Physiol Rev 88:59-89.
37. Pinto N, Cox DD, DiCarlo JJ (2008) Why is real-world visual object recognition hard? PLoS Comput Biol 4:e27.
38. Poggio T, Edelman S (1990) A network that learns to recognize threedimensional objects. Nature 343:263-266.
39. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (1999) Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat Neurosci 2:1019-1025.
40. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (2000) Models of object recognition. Nat Neurosci 3 [Suppl]:1199-1204.
41. Rolls ET (2000) Functions of the primate temporal lobe cortical visual areas in invariant visual object and face recognition. Neuron 27:205-218.
42. Sawamura H, Orban GA, Vogels R (2006) Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: A single-cell study of the fMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 49:307-318.
43. Sawinski J, Wallace DJ, Greenberg DS, Grossmann S, Denk W, Kerr JND (2009) Visually evoked activity in cortical cells imaged in freely moving animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19557-19562.
44. Schmidt T (2002) The finger in flight: real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychol Sci 13:112-118.
45. Smith SL, Hausser M (2010) Parallel processing of visual space by neighboring neurons in mouse visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 13:1144-1149.
46. Suzuki S, Cavanagh P (1998) A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1315-1341.
47. Tanaka K (1996) Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:109-139.
48. Tarr MJ, Bülthoff HH (1998) Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. Cognition 67:1-20.
49. Ullman S (2000) High-level vision: object recognition and visual cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
50. Ullman S (2007) Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends Cogn Sci 11:58-64.
51. Ullman S, Soloviev S (1999) Computation of pattern invariance in brainlike structures. Neural Netw 12:1021-1036.
52. Verhoef BE, Kayaert G, Franko E, Vangeneugden J, Vogels R (2008) Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent. J Neurosci 28:10631-10640.
53. Vorberg D, Mattler U, Heinecke A, Schmidt T, Schwarzbach J (2003) Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:6275-6280.
54. Wang G, Obama S, Yamashita W, Sugihara T, Tanaka K (2005) Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles. Nat Neurosci 8:1768-1775.
55. Wiggs CL, Martin A (1998) Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:227-233.
56. Yamashita W, Wang G, Tanaka K (2010) View-invariant object recognition ability develops after discrimination, not mere exposure, at several viewing angles. European J Neurosci 31:327-335.
57. Zoccolan D, Oertelt N, DiCarlo JJ, Cox DD (2009) A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:8748-8753.