Normal mode-based approaches in receptor ensemble docking

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 819, Issue , 2012, Pages 157-168

  Cavasotto, Claudio N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Coarse grained representation; Computer aided drug discovery; Docking; Elastic network model; High throughput docking; Multiple receptor conformations; Normal mode analysis; Receptor ensemble docking

Indexed keywords

CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE;

EID: 84855925856     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_11     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Shoichet, B. K. (2004) Virtual screening of chemical libraries, Nature 432, 862-865. (Pubitemid 40037142)
2. Cavasotto, C. N., and Orry, A. J. (2007) Ligand Docking and Structure-based Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 7, 1006-1014. (Pubitemid 47040528)
3. Jorgensen, W. L. (2004) The many roles of computation in drug discovery, Science 303, 1813-1818. (Pubitemid 38374866)
4. Cavasotto, C. N., and Singh, N. (2008) Docking and High Throughput Docking: Successes and the Challenge of Protein Flexibility Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Design 4, 221-234.
5. Teague, S. J. (2003) Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery, Nat Rev Drug Discov 2, 527-541. (Pubitemid 37361745)
6. Cavasotto, C. N., and Abagyan, R. A. (2004) Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases, J. Mol. Biol. 337, 209-225. (Pubitemid 38270258)
7. Cavasotto, C. N., Kovacs, J. A., and Abagyan, R. A. (2005) Representing Receptor Flexibility in Ligand Docking through Relevant Normal Modes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9632-9640. (Pubitemid 40934775)
8. Erickson, J. A., Jalaie, M., Robertson, D. H., Lewis, R. A., and Vieth, M. (2004) Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy, J. Med. Chem. 47, 45-55. (Pubitemid 38040489)
9. Ferrari, A. M., Wei, B. Q., Costantino, L., and Shoichet, B. K. (2004) Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening, J. Med. Chem. 47, 5076-5084. (Pubitemid 39314905)
10. Barril, X., and Fradera, X. (2006) Incorporating protein flexibility into docking and structure-based drug design, Exp. Opin. Drug Discov. 1, 335-349.
11. Cozzini, P., Kellogg, G. E., Spyrakis, F., Abraham, D. J., Costantino, G., Emerson, A., Fanelli, F., Gohlke, H., Kuhn, L. A., Morris, G. M., Orozco, M., Pertinhez, T. A., Rizzi, M., and Sotriffer, C. A. (2008) Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design, J Med Chem 51, 6237-6255.
12. Spyrakis, F., Bidon-Chanal, A., Barril, X., and Luque, F. J. (2011) Protein Flexibility and Ligand Recognition: Challenges for Molecular Modeling, Curr Top Med Chem 11, 192-210.
13. Jiang, F., and Kim, S. H. (1991) "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes, J. Mol. Biol. 219, 79-102. (Pubitemid 121003975)
14. Jones, G., Willett, P., and Glen, R. C. (1995) Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation, J. Mol. Biol. 245, 43-53.
15. Leach, A. R. (1994) Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility, J. Mol. Biol. 235, 345-356. (Pubitemid 24049519)
16. Amaro, R. E., and Li, W. W. (2010) Emerging methods for ensemble-based virtual screening, Curr Top Med Chem 10, 3-13.
17. Bahar, I., Lezon, T. R., Bakan, A., and Shrivastava, I. H. (2010) Normal mode analysis of biomolecular structures: functional mechanisms of membrane proteins, Chem Rev 110, 1463-1497.
18. Krebs, W. G., Alexandrov, V., Wilson, C. A., Echols, N., Yu, H., and Gerstein, M. (2002) Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic, Proteins 48, 682-695. (Pubitemid 34925457)
19. Tirion, M. M. (1996) Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1905-1908. (Pubitemid 126625816)
20. Bahar, I., Atilgan, A. R., and Erman, B. (1997) Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential, Fold Des 2, 173-181. (Pubitemid 127740467)
21. Bakan, A., and Bahar, I. (2010) Computational generation inhibitor-bound conformers of p38 map kinase and comparison with experiments, Pac Symp Biocomput, 181-192.
22. Floquet, N., Marechal, J. D., Badet-Denisot, M. A., Robert, C. H., Dauchez, M., and Perahia, D. (2006) Normal mode analysis as a prerequisite for drug design: application to matrix metalloproteinases inhibitors, FEBS Lett 580, 5130-5136. (Pubitemid 44415782)
23. Floquet, N., M'Kadmi, C., Perahia, D., Gagne, D., Berge, G., Marie, J., Baneres, J. L., Galleyrand, J. C., Fehrentz, J. A., and Martinez, J. (2010) Activation of the ghrelin receptor is described by a privileged collective motion: a model for constitutive and agonist-induced activation of a sub-class A G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), J Mol Biol 395, 769-784.
24. Kovacs, J. A., Cavasotto, C. N., and Abagyan, R. A. (2005) Conformational Sampling of Protein Flexibility in Generalized Coordinates: Application to ligand docking, J. Comp. Theor. Nanosci. 2, 354-361. (Pubitemid 41556042)
25. Lindahl, E., and Delarue, M. (2005) Refinement of docked protein-ligand and protein-DNA structures using low frequency normal mode amplitude optimization, Nucleic Acids Res 33, 4496-4506. (Pubitemid 41222564)
26. May, A., and Zacharias, M. (2005) Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking, Biochim Biophys Acta 1754, 225-231. (Pubitemid 41797702)
27. May, A., and Zacharias, M. (2008) Proteinligand docking accounting for receptor side chain and global flexibility in normal modes: evaluation on kinase inhibitor cross docking, J Med Chem 51, 3499-3506. (Pubitemid 351875006)
28. Rai, B. K., Tawa, G. J., Katz, A. H., and Humblet, C. (2010) Modeling G proteincoupled receptors for structure-based drug discovery using low-frequency normal modes for refinement of homology models: application to H3 antagonists, Proteins 78, 457-473.
29. Rueda, M., Bottegoni, G., and Abagyan, R. (2009) Consistent improvement of crossdocking results using binding site ensembles generated with elastic network normal modes, J Chem Inf Model 49, 716-725.
30. Sperandio, O., Mouawad, L., Pinto, E., Villoutreix, B. O., Perahia, D., and Miteva, M. A. (2010) How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis, Eur Biophys J 39, 1365-1372.
31. Gerek, Z. N., and Ozkan, S. B. (2010) A flexible docking scheme to explore the binding selectivity of PDZ domains, Protein Sci 19, 914-928.
32. Cavasotto, C. N., and Phatak, S. S. (2009) Homology modeling in drug discovery: current trends and applications, Drug Discovery Today 14, 676-683.
33. Goldstein, H. (1985) Classical Mechanics, Second ed., Addison-Wesley, Inc., Reading, MA.
34. Fetter, A. L., and Walecka, J. D. (2003) Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua, First ed., Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY.
35. Levitt, M., Sander, C., and Stern, P. S. (1985) Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme, J. Mol. Biol. 181, 423-447.
36. Atilgan, A. R., Durell, S. R., Jernigan, R. L., Demirel, M. C., Keskin, O., and Bahar, I. (2001) Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model, Biophys J 80, 505-515.
37. Eyal, E., Yang, L. W., and Bahar, I. (2006) Anisotropic network model: systematic evaluation and a new web interface, Bioinformatics 22, 2619-2627. (Pubitemid 44642600)
38. Hinsen, K. (1998) Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations, Proteins 33, 417-429. (Pubitemid 28516346)
39. Mashiach, E., Nussinov, R., andWolfson, H. J. (2010) FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking, Proteins 78, 1503-1519.
40. Kondrashov, D. A., Cui, Q., and Phillips, G. N., Jr. (2006) Optimization and evaluation of a coarse-grained model of protein motion using x-ray crystal data, Biophys J 91, 2760-2767. (Pubitemid 44526467)
41. Pearlman, D. A., Case, D. A., Caldwell, J. W., Ross, W. R., Cheatham, T. E., 3rd, DeBolt, S., Ferguson, D., Seibel, G., and Kollman, P. A. (1995) AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules, Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 1-41.
42. Brooks, B. R., Bruccoleri, R. E., Olafson, B. D., States, D. J., Swaminathan, S., and Karplus, M. (1983) Charmm -a Program For Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations, J. Comput. Chem. 4, 187-217.
43. Canutescu, A. A., and Dunbrack, R. L., Jr. (2003) Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure, Protein Sci 12, 963-972. (Pubitemid 36505431)
44. Petrone, P., and Pande, V. S. (2006) Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes?, Biophys. J. 90, 1583-1593.
45. Li, Z., and Scheraga, H. A. (1987) Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 84, 6611-6615.
46. Monti, M. C., Casapullo, A., Cavasotto, C. N., Napolitano, A., and Riccio, R. (2007) Scalaradial, a Dialdehyde-Containing Marine Metabolite That Causes an Unexpected Noncovalent PLA(2) Inactivation, ChemBioChem 8, 1585-1591. (Pubitemid 47436916)
47. Monti, M. C., Casapullo, A., Cavasotto, C. N., Tosco, A., Dal Piaz, F., Ziemys, A., Margarucci, L., and Riccio, R. (2009) The binding mode of petrosaspongiolide M to the human group IIA phospholipase A(2): exploring the role of covalent and noncovalent interactions in the inhibition process, Chem.-Eur. J. 15, 1155-1163.
48. Cavasotto, C. N., Orry, A. J., Murgolo, N. J., Czarniecki, M. F., Kocsi, S. A., Hawes, B. E., O'Neill, K. A., Hine, H., Burton, M. S., Voigt, J. H., Abagyan, R. A., Bayne, M. L., and Monsma, F. J., Jr. (2008) Discovery of novel chemotypes to a G-protein-coupled receptor through ligand-steered homology modeling and structure-based virtual screening, J. Med. Chem. 51, 581-588. (Pubitemid 351252286)
49. Phatak, S. S., Gatica, E. A., and Cavasotto, C. N. (2010) Ligand-steered modeling and docking: A benchmarking study in Class A G-Protein-Coupled Receptors, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 2119-2128.
50. Cheng, L. S., Amaro, R. E., Xu, D., Li, W. W., Arzberger, P. W., and McCammon, J. A. (2008) Ensemble-based virtual screening reveals potential novel antiviral compounds for avian influenza neuraminidase, J. Med. Chem. 51, 3878-3894. (Pubitemid 351956517)
51. Brady, G. P., Jr., and Stouten, P. F. (2000) Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS, J Comput Aided Mol Des 14, 383-401. (Pubitemid 30219399)
52. Ahmed, A., Villinger, S., and Gohlke, H. (2010) Large-scale comparison of protein essential dynamics from molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained normal mode analyses, Proteins 78, 3341-3352.
53. Barril, X., and Morley, S. D. (2005) Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures, J Med Chem 48, 4432-4443. (Pubitemid 40884945)
54. Bolstad, E. S., and Anderson, A. C. (2008) In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: the role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking, Proteins 73, 566-580. (Pubitemid 352788641)
55. Villoutreix, B. O., Eudes, R., and Miteva, M. A. (2009) Structure-based virtual ligand screening: recent success stories, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 12, 1000-1016.
56. McInnes, C. (2007) Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery, Curr Opin Chem Biol 11, 494-502. (Pubitemid 47589008)
57. Anderson, A. C. (2003) The process of structure-based drug design, Chem. Biol. 10, 787-797. (Pubitemid 37171897)
58. Bahar, I., and Rader, A. J. (2005) Coarsegrained normal mode analysis in structural biology, Curr Opin Struct Biol 15, 586-592. (Pubitemid 41393491)
59. Chennubhotla, C., Rader, A. J., Yang, L. W., and Bahar, I. (2005) Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies, Phys Biol 2, S173-180. (Pubitemid 41609444)