Time-course of hemispheric preference for processing contralateral relevant shapes: P1pc, N1pc, N2pc, N3pc

Advances in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 19-28

  Verleger, Rolf ^a   Vel Grajewska, Blandyna Zurawska ^b   Jaskowski, Piotr ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT   (Poland)

Author keywords

Attention; Event related potentials; N1pc; N2pc; N3pc; P1pc; SPCN

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855911582     PISSN: 18951171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5709/acp-0098-9     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Dell'Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Jolicoeur, P., & Robitaille, N. (2006). Spatial attention freezes during the attentional blink. Psychophysiology, 43, 394-400.
2. Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225-234.
3. Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1423-1433.
4. Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347.
5. Gao, Z., Yin, J., Xu, H., Shui, R., & Shen, M. (2011). Tracking object number or information load in visual working memory: Revisiting the cognitive implication of contralateral delay activity. Biological Psychology, 87, 296-302.
6. Hickey, C., Di Lollo, V., & McDonald, J. J. (2009). Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 760-775.
7. Hopf, J.-M., Luck, S. J., Boelmans, M. A., Schoenfeld, M. A., Boehler, C. N., Rieger, J., & Heinze, H.-J. (2006). The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 3532-3540.
8. Jaśkowski, P., Skalska, B., & Verleger, R. (2003). How the self controls its "automatic pilot" when processing subliminal information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911-920.
9. Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by stimuli that are not consciously identified. Psychological Science,13, 48-54.
10. Jolicoeur, P., Sessa, P., Dell'Acqua, R., & Robitaille, N. (2006). On the control of visual spatial attention: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Research, 70, 414-424.
11. Kimura, M., Katayama, J., & Murohashi, H. (2006). Probability-independent and -dependent ERPs reflecting visual change detection. Psychophysiology, 43, 180-189.
12. Kimura, M., Katayama, J., & Murohashi, H. (2008). Involvement of memory-comparison-based change detection in visual distraction. Psychophysiology, 45, 445-457.
13. Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research, 58, 92-101.
14. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Goodin, Z., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: Converging evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 509-530.
15. Luck, S. J., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1993). Attention-related modulation of sensory-evoked brain activity in a visual search task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 188-195.
16. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291-308.
17. Mazza, V., & Caramazza, A. (2011). Temporal brain dynamics of multiple object processing: The flexibility of individuation. PLoS One, 6, e17453.
18. Mazza, V., Turatto, M., Umiltà, C., & Eimer, M. (2007). Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses. Experimental Brain Research, 181, 531-536.
19. Oostenveld, R., Stegeman, D. F., Praamstra, P., & van Oosterom, A. (2003). Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1194-1202.
20. Praamstra, P., & Plat, F. M. (2001). Failed suppression of direct visuomotor activation in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 31-43.
21. Praamstra, P., & Oostenveld, R. (2003). Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: A high-density EEGstudy of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 309-322.
22. Seiss, E., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2009). Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search? Psychophysiology, 46, 703-717.
23. Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147-162.
24. van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Jaśkowski, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple detection task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 241-255.
25. van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Keuss, P. J. G., & Stoffels, E.-J. (1996). Threefold effect of peripheral precues: Alertness, orienting, and response tendencies. Acta Psychologica, 94, 319-337.
26. van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Verleger, R. (2002). Aging and the Simon task. Psychophysiology, 39, 100-110.
27. Verleger, R., & Jaśkowski, P. (2007). Disentangling neural processing of masked and masking stimulus by means of event-related contralateral: Ipsilateral differences of EEGpotentials. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-210.
28. Verleger, R., Śmigasiewicz, K., & Möller, F. (2011). Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: Evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs. Psychophysiology, 48, 1096-1106.
29. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.
30. Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500-503.
31. Wascher, E., & Beste, C. (2010). Tuning perceptual competition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1057-1065.
32. Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731-751.
33. Wascher, E., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). The interaction of stimulus-And response-related processes measured by event-related lateralisations of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 149-162.
34. Wauschkuhn, B., Verleger, R., Wascher, E., Klostermann, W., Burk, M., Heide, W., & Kömpf, D. (1998). Lateralised human cortical activity for shifting visuospatial attention and initiating saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2900-2910.
35. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological mea-surement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400, 867-869.