Sexual size and shape dimorphism in the Moorish gecko (Tarentola mauritanica, Gekkota, Phyllodactylidae)

North-Western Journal of Zoology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 189-197

  Zuffi, Marco A L ^a   Sacchi, Roberto ^b   Pupin, Fabio ^c   Cencetti, Tommaso ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^c MUSEO TRIDENTINO DI SCIENZE NATURALI   (Italy)

^d CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Biometry; Moorish gecko; Morphometrics; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

GEKKONIDAE; GEKKOTA; SERPENTES; SQUAMATA; TARENTOLA MAURITANICA;

EID: 84855849684     PISSN: 15849074     EISSN: 18435629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson, R.A., Vitt, L.J. (1990): Sexual selection versus alternative causes of sexual dimorphism in teiid lizards. Oecologia 84: 145-157.
2. Andersson, M. (1993): Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. Atzori, A., Berti, F., Cencetti, T., Fornasiero, S., Tamburini, M., Zuffi, M.A.L. (2007): Advances in methodologies of sexing and marking less dimorphic gekkonid lizards: the study case of the Moorish gecko, Tarentola mauritanica. Amphibia-Reptilia 28: 449-454.
4. Bauer, A.M. (1994): Liste der rezenten Amphibien und Reptilien: Gekkonidae I (Australia)- Das Tierreich 108. W. de Gruyter & Co., Berlin.
5. Berry, J.F., Shine, R. (1980): Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (Order Testudines). Oecologia 44: 185-191.
6. Bookstein, F.L. (1991): Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, New York.
7. Braña, F. (1996): Sexual dimorphism in lacertid lizards: male head increase vs female abdomen increase? Oikos 75: 511-523.
8. Bruner, E., Constantini, D., Fanfani, A., Dell'Omo, G. (2005): Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism of the cephalic scales in Lacerta bilineata. Acta Zoologica 86: 245-254.
9. Bull, C.M., Pamula, Y. (1996): Sexually dimorphic head sizes and reproductive success in the sleepy lizard Tiliqua rugosa. Journal of Zoology, London 240: 511-521.
10. Butler, M. (2007): Vive le difference! Sexual dimorphism and adaptive patterns in lizards of the genus Anolis. Integrative and Comparative Biology 47: 272-284.
11. Butler, M.A., Losos, J.B. (2002): Multivariate sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Ecological Monographs 72: 541-59.
12. Butler, M.A, Schoener, T.W., Losos, J.B. (2000): The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54: 259-272.
13. Capula, M., Luiselli, L. (1994): Trophic niche overlap in sympatric Tarentola mauritanica and Hemidactylus turcicus: a preliminary study. The Herpetological Journal 4: 24-25.
14. Carothers, J.H. (1984): Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in some herbivorous lizards. American Naturalist 124: 244-254.
15. Carpenter, G.C. (1995): Modeling dominance: the influence of size, coloration and experience on dominance relations in tree lizards (Urosaurus ornatus). Herpetological Monographs 9: 88-101.
16. Carpenter, C., Ferguson, G.W. (1977): Variation and evolution of stereotyped behaviour in Reptiles. pp. 335-354. In: Gans, C., Tinkle, D.W. (eds), Biology of the Reptilia Vol.7. Ecology & Behavior. Academic Press, New York.
17. Collyer, M.L., Adams, D.C. (2007): Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic chane in ecological studies. Ecology 88: 683-692.
18. Cox, R.M., Skelly, S.L., John-Alder, H.B. (2003): A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57: 1653-1669.
19. Cox, R.M., Zilberman, V., John-Alder, H.B. (2006): Environmental sensitivity of sexual size dimorphism: laboratory common garden removes effects of sex and castration on lizard growth. Functional Ecology 20: 880-888.
20. Crews, D., Diamond, M., Whittier, M.J., Mason, R. (1985): Small male body size in garter snakes depends on testes. American Journal of Physiology 249: R62-66.
21. Darwin, C. (1871): The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
22. Fairbairn, D.J. (1997): Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 659-687.
23. Fontaneto, D., Melone, G., Cardini, A. (2004): Shape diversity in the trophi of different species of Rotaria (Rotifera, Bdelloidea): a geometric morphometric study. Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 63-72.
24. Gil, M.J., Guerrero, F., Perez-Mellado, V. (1994): Seasonal-variation in diet composition and prey selection in the Mediterranean gecko Tarentola mauritanica. Israel Journal of Zoology 40: 61-74.
25. Gruber, B., Henle, K. (2004): Linking habitat structure and orientation in an arboreal species Gehyra variegata (Gekkonidae). Oikos 107: 406-414.
26. Gvoždík, L., Van Damme, R. (2003): Evolutionary maintainance of sexual dimorphism in head size in the lizard Zootoca vivipara: a test of two hypotheses. Journal of Zoology, London 259: 7-13.
27. Hedrick, A.V., Temeles, E.J. (1989): The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals. Hypotheses and tests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 136-138.
28. Herrel, A., Schaerlaeken, V., Moravec, J., Ross, C.F. (2009). Sexual Shape dimorphism in Tuatara. Copeia 4: 727-731.
29. Hibbits, T.J., Pianka, E.R., Huey, R.B., Whiting, M.J. (2005): Ecology of the Common Barking Gecko (Ptenopus garrulus) in southern Africa. Journal of Herpetology 39: 509-515.
30. Hódar, J.A., Pleguezuelos, J.M., Villafranca, C., Fernández-Cardenete, J.R. (2006): Foraging mode of the Moorish gecko Tarentola mauritanica in an arid environment: inferences from abiotic setting, prey availability and dietary composition. Journal of Arid Environments 65: 83-93.
31. Hsu, Y., Earley, R.L., Wolf, L.L. (2006): Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biological Reviews 81: 33-74.
32. Kaliontzopoulou, A., Carretero, M.A., Llorente, G.A. (2008): Head shape allometry and proximate causes of head sexual dimorphism in Podarcis lizards: joining linear and geometric morphometrics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 111-124.
33. Klingenberg, C.P. (1998): Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biological Reviews 73: 79-123.
34. Kratochvíl, L., Frynta, D. (2002): Body size, male combat and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in eublepharid geckos (Squamata: Eublepharidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76: 303-314.
35. Lopez, P., Martin, J. (2001): Fighting rules and rival recognition reduces cost of aggression in male lizard, Podarcis hispanica. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 49: 111-116.
36. Lerner, D.T., Mason, R.T. (2001): The influence of sex steroids in the sexual size dimorphism in the red-spotted garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis concinnus. General and Comparative Endocrinology 124: 218-225.
37. McMann, S. (1993): Contextual signalling and the structure of dyadic encounters in Anolis carolinensis. Animal Behaviour 46: 657-668.
38. Olsson, M., Shine, R., Wapstra, E., Ujvari, B., Madsen, T. (2002): Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution 56: 1538-1542.
39. O'Higgins, P., Jones, N. (1999): Morphologika. Tools for Shape Analysis. Univerisity College London, London.
40. Ota, H., Honda, M., Kobayashi, M., Sengoku, S., Hikida, T. (1999): Phylogenetic relationships of eublepharid geckos (Reptilia: Squamata): a molecular approach. Zoological Science 16: 659-666.
41. Parker, W.S., Pianka, E.R. (1974): Further ecological observations on the Western banded gecko, Coleonyx variegatus. Copeia 1974: 528-531.
42. Peters, J.A., Donoso-Barros, R., Orejas-Miranda, B. (1986): Catalogue of the Neotropical Squamata. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
43. Piantoni, C., Ibargüengoytía, N.R., Cussac, V.E. (2006): Growth and age of the southernmost distributed gecko of the world (Homonota darwini) studied by skeletochronology. Amphibia-Reptilia 27: 393-400.
44. Preest, M.R. (1994): Sexual size dimorphism and feeding energetics in Anolis carolinensis: why do females take smaller prey than males? Journal of Herpetology 28: 292-298.
45. Rieppel, O. (1981): Tarentola mauritanica (Linnaeus 1758) ?Mauergecko. pp. 119-133. In: Böhme, W. (ed), Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Band 1: Echsen (Sauria). I. (Gekkonidae, Agamidae, Chamaeleonidae, Anguidae, Amphisbaenidae, Scincidae, Lacertidae). Verlag, Wiesbaden.
46. Rohlf, F.J. (1999): Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 16: 197-223.
47. Rohlf, F.J. (2003): tpsSMALL, Version 1.20. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York.
48. Rohlf, F.J. (2004): tpsRegr, Version 1.29. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York.
49. Rohlf, F.J. (2005): tpsRelw, relative warps analysis, Version 1.42.. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York.
50. Rohlf, F.J., Slice, D. (1990): Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
51. Sacchi, R., Pupin F., Gentilli, A., Rubolini, D., Scali, S., Fasola, M., Galeotti, P. (2009): Male-male combats in a polymorphic lizard: residency and size, but not color, affect fighting rules and contest outcome. Aggressive Behaviour 35(3): 274-283.
52. Salvidio, S., Delaugerre, M. (2003): Population dynamics of the European leaf-toed gecko (Euleptes europaea) in NW Italy: implications for conservation. The Herpetological Journal 13: 81-88.
53. Salvidio, S., Oneto, F.M. (2008): Density regulation in the Mediterranean leaf-toed gecko Euleptes europaea. Ecological Research 23: 1051-1055.
54. Schoener, T.W (1967): The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155: 474-477.
55. Shine, R. (1991): Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. American Naturalist 138: 103-122.
56. Shine, R. (1993): Sexual dimorphism in snakes. pp. 48-86. In: Seigel, R.A., Collins, J.T. (eds), Snakes: ecology and behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York.
57. Shine, R. (1994): Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 1994: 326-346.
58. Shine, R., Crews, D. (1988): Why male garter snakes have small heads: the evolution and endocrine control of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 42: 1105-1110.
59. Slatkin, M. (1984): Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 622-630.
60. Stamps, J. (1983): Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism and territoriality. pp.169-204. In: Huey, R.B., Pianka, E.R., Schoener, T.W. (eds), Lizard ecology: Studies of a Model Organism. Harvard University Press, Harvard.
61. Stamps, J.A., Krishnan, V.V. (1994): Territory acquisition in lizards: II Establishing social and spatial relationships. Animal Behaviour 47: 1387-1400.
62. Stamps, J.A., Krishnan, V.V. (1998): Territory acquisition in lizards: IV Obtaining high status and exclusive home ranges. Animal Behaviour 55: 461-472.
63. Summers, C.H., Greenberg, N. (1994): Somatic correlates of adrenergic activity during aggression in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. Hormones and Behaviour 28: 29-40.
64. Thompson, G.G., Withers, P.C. (2005): Size-free differences between male and female Western Australian dragon lizards (Agamidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 26: 55-63.
65. Todd, A.C. (2005): The social mating system of Hoplodactylus maculatus. New Zealand Journal Zoology 32: 251-262.
66. Tokarz, R.R. (1985): Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged encounters between male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Animal Behaviour 33: 746-753.
67. Uetz, P., Hošek, J. (2011): The reptile database. http://reptiledatabase. org (download on March 31st 2011)
68. Vincent, S.E., Herrel, A. (2007): Functional and ecological correlates of ecologically-based dimorphisms in squamate reptiles. Integrative and Comparative Biology 47: 172-188.
69. Vitt, L.J., Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1985): The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the skink Eumeces laticeps: an example of sexual selection. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 995-1002.
70. Walker, S.E., Rypstra, A.L. (2002): Sexual dimorphism in trophic morphology and feeding behavior of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) as a result of differences in reproductive roles. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 679-688.
71. Welch, K.R.G. (1994): Lizards of the World. A Checklist: Geckos. Somerset, KCM Books.
72. Zucker, N., Murray, L. (1996): Determinants of dominance in the tree lizard Urosaurus ornatus: the relative importance of mass, previous experience and coloration. Ethology 102: 812-825.