Sensitivities of simulated convective storms to environmental CAPE

Monthly Weather Review

Volumn 139, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3514-3532

  Kirkpatrick, Cody ^a,c   Mccaul Jr , Eugene W ^b   Cohen, Charles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY CORPORATION FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Convective storms

Indexed keywords

CLOUD-RESOLVING SIMULATION; CONVECTIVE STORMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETER; GROUND AREA; LAPSE RATE; NUMBER AND SIZE; PRECIPITABLE WATER; RAINFALL RATES; REDUCED HEIGHT; RELATIVE STRENGTH; SIMULATION DOMAIN; STORM PRECIPITATION; SUPER CELL; TIME-AVERAGED; VERTICAL VORTICITY;

NATURAL CONVECTION; RAIN; VORTICITY;

STORMS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONVECTIVE SYSTEM; CORRELATION; KINETIC ENERGY; PRECIPITABLE WATER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STORM; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; VORTICITY;

EID: 84855780792     PISSN: 00270644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/2011MWR3631.1     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adlerman, E. J., and K. K. Droegemeier, 2005: The dependence of numerically simulated cyclic mesocyclogenesis upon environmental vertical wind shear. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 3595-3623.
2. Auer, A. H., Jr., and J. D. Marwitz, 1968: Estimates of air and moisture flux into hailstorms on the High Plains. J. Appl. Meteor., 7, 196-198.
3. Brooks, H. E., 2009: Proximity soundings for severe convection for Europe and the United States from reanalysis data. Atmos. Res., 93, 546-553.
4. Brooks, H. E., A. R. Anderson, K. Riemann, I. Ebbers, and H. Flachs, 2007: Climatological aspects of convective parameters from the NCAR/NCEP reanalysis. Atmos. Res., 83, 294-305.
5. Browning, K. A., 1962: Cellular structure of convective storms. Meteor. Mag., 91, 341-350.
6. Browning, K. A., 1964: Airflow and precipitation trajectories within severe local storms which travel to the right of the winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 634-639.
7. Bryan, G. H., J. C. Wyngaard, and J. M. Fritsch, 2003: Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2394-2416.
8. Bunkers, M. J., B. A. Klimowski, J. W. Zeitler, R. L. Thompson, and M. L. Weisman, 2000: Predicting supercell motion using a new hodograph technique. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 61-79.
9. Bunkers, M. J., J. S. Johnson, L. J.Czepyha, J.M. Grzywacz, B.A.Klimowski, and M. R. Hjelmfelt, 2006: An observational examination of long-lived supercells. Part II: Environmental conditions and forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 689-714.
10. Chin, H.-N. S., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1998: Evolution and structure of tropical squall-line environments within a moderate CAPE and strong low-level jet environment. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3089-3113.
11. Cohen, C., and E. W. McCaul Jr., 2006: The sensitivity of simulated convective storms to variations in prescribed single-moment microphysics parameters that describe particle distributions, sizes, and numbers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2547-2565.
12. Cohen, C., and E. W. McCaul Jr., 2007: Further results on the sensitivity of simulated storm precipitation efficiency to environmental temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 1671-1684.
13. Colman, B. R., 1990: Thunderstorms above frontal surfaces without positive CAPE. Part I: A climatology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1103-1122.
14. Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, 1989: Storm and Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 881 pp.
15. Craven, J. P., and H. E. Brooks, 2004: Baseline climatology of sounding derived parameters associated with deep, moist convection. Natl. Wea. Dig., 28, 13-24.
16. Davies, J. M., 2004: Estimations of CIN and LFC associated with tornadic and nontornadic supercells. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 714-726.
17. Davies, J. M., 2006a: Hurricane and tropical cyclone tornado environments from RUC proximity soundings. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 12.6A. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/23SLS/ techprogram/paper_115483.htm.].
18. Davies, J. M., 2006b:RUCsoundings with cool season tornadoes in "small" CAPE settings and the 6 November 2005 Evansville, Indiana tornado. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 4.3. [Available online at http:// ams.confex.com/ams/23SLS/techprogram/paper_115477.htm.].
19. Dean, A. R., R. S. Schneider, R. L. Thompson, J. Hart, and P. D. Bothwell, 2009: The conditional risk of severe convection estimated from archived NWS/Storm Prediction Center mesoscale objective analyses: Potential uses in support of forecast operations and verification. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/19th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 6A.5. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/23WAF19NWP/techprogram/ paper_154304.htm.].
20. Doswell, C. A., III, and D. M. Schultz, 2006: On the use of indices and parameters in forecasting severe storms. Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteor., 1 (3), 1-22.
21. Doswell, C. A., III, H. E. Brooks, and R. A. Maddox, 1996: Flash flood forecasting: An ingredients-based methodology. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 560-581.
22. Droegemeier, K. K., S. M. Lazarus, and R. P. Davies-Jones, 1993: The influence of helicity on numerically simulated convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2005-2029.
23. Elmore, K. L., D. J. Stensrud, and K. C. Crawford, 2002a: Ensemble cloud model applications to forecasting thunderstorms. J. Appl. Meteor., 41, 363-383.
24. Elmore, K. L., D. J. Stensrud, and K. C. Crawford, 2002b: Explicit cloud-scale models for operational forecasts: A note of caution. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 873-884.
25. Esterheld, J. M., and D. J. Giuliano, 2008: Discriminating between tornadic and non-tornadic supercells: A new hodograph technique. Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteor., 3 (2), 1-50.
26. Evans, J. S., and C. A., Doswell III, 2001: Examination of derecho environments using proximity soundings. Wea. Forecasting, 16, 329-342.
27. Fankhauser, J. C., 1988: Estimates of thunderstorm precipitation efficiency from field measurements in CCOPE. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 663-684.
28. Ferrier, B. S., J. Simpson, and W.-K. Tao, 1996: Factors responsible for precipitation efficiencies in midlatitude and tropical squallline simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2100-2125.
29. Geerts, B., T. Andretta, S. J. Luberda, J. Vogt, Y. Wang, L. D. Oolman, J. Finch, and D. Bikos, 2009: A case study of a longlived tornadic mesocyclone in a low-CAPE complex-terrain environment. Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteor., 4 (3), 1-29.
30. Heymsfield, G. M., and S. Schotz, 1985: Structure and evolution of a severe squall line over Oklahoma. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113, 1563-1589.
31. Horgan, K. L., D. M. Schultz, R. H. Johns, J. E. Hales, and S. F. Corfidi, 2007: A five-year climatology of elevated severe convective storms in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 1031-1044.
32. James, R. P., and P. M. Markowski, 2010: A numerical investigation of the effects of dry air aloft on deep convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 140-161.
33. Johns, R. H., J. M. Davies, and P. W. Leftwich, 1993: Some wind and instability parameters associated with strong and violent tornadoes. 2. Variations in the combinations of wind and instability parameters. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Hazards, and Prediction, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 583-590.
34. Kennedy, P. C., N. E. Westcott, and R. W. Scott, 1993: Single-Doppler radar observations of a mini-supercell tornadic thunderstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1860-1870.
35. Kerr, B. W., and G. L. Darkow, 1996: Storm-relative winds and helicity in the tornadic thunderstorm environment. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 489-505.
36. Kirkpatrick, C., E. W. McCaul Jr., and C. Cohen, 2007: The motion of simulated convective storms as a function of basic environmental parameters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3033-3051.
37. Kirkpatrick, C., E. W. McCaul Jr., and C. Cohen, 2009: Variability of updraft and downdraft characteristics in a large parameter space study of convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1550-1561.
38. Klemp, J. B., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1978: The simulation of threedimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1070-1096.
39. Knupp, K. R., J. R. Stalker, and E. W. McCaul, 1998: An observational and numerical study of a mini-supercell storm. Atmos. Res., 49, 35-63.
40. Lanicci, J. M., and T. T. Warner, 1991: A synoptic climatology of the elevated-mixed layer inversion over the southern Great Plains in spring. Part I: Structure, dynamics, and seasonal evolution. Wea. Forecasting, 6, 181-197.
41. Maddox, R. A., 1976: An evaluation of tornado proximity wind and stability data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 104, 133-142.
42. Market, P., S. Allen, R. Scofield, R. Kuligowski, and A. Gruber, 2003: Precipitation efficiency of warm-season Midwestern mesoscale convective systems. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1273-1285.
43. Markowski, P. M., and J. M. Straka, 2000: Some observations of rotating updrafts in a low-buoyancy, highly sheared environment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 449-461.
44. Markowski, P. M., C. Hannon, J. Frame, E. Lancaster, A. Pietrycha, R. Edwards, and R. L. Thompson, 2003: Characteristics of vertical wind profiles near supercells obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1262-1272.
45. Marwitz, J. D., 1972: Precipitation efficiency of thunderstorms on the High Plains. J. Res. Atmos., 6, 367-370.
46. McCaul, E. W., Jr., 1991: Buoyancy and shear characteristics of hurricane-tornado environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 1954-1978.
47. McCaul, E. W., Jr., and M. L. Weisman, 1996: Simulations of shallow supercell storms in landfalling hurricane environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 408-429.
48. McCaul, E. W., Jr., and M. L. Weisman, 2001: The sensitivity of simulated supercell structure and intensity to variations in the shapes of environmental buoyancy and shear profiles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 664-687.
49. McCaul, E. W., Jr., and C. Cohen, 2002: The impact on simulated storm structure and intensity of variations in the mixed layer and moist layer depths. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1722-1748.
50. McCaul, E. W., Jr., C. Cohen, and C. Kirkpatrick, 2005: The sensitivity of simulated storm structure, intensity, and precipitation efficiency to environmental temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 3015-3037.
51. Miglietta, M. M., and R. Rotunno, 2010: Numerical simulations of low-CAPE flows over a mountain ridge. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2391-2401.
52. Monteverdi, J. P., and J. Quadros, 1994: Convective and rotational parameters associated with three tornado episodes in Northern and Central California. Wea. Forecasting, 9, 285-300.
53. Montgomery, D. C., and G. C. Runger, 2003: Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. 3rd ed. Wiley and Sons, Inc., 706 pp.
54. Moore, J. T., A. C. Czarnetzki, and P. S. Market, 1998: Heavy precipitation associated with elevated thunderstorms formed in a convectively unstable layer aloft. Meteor. Appl., 5, 373-384.
55. Rasmussen, E. N., 2003: Refined supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 530-535.
56. Rasmussen, E. N., and D. O. Blanchard, 1998: A baseline climatology of sounding-derived supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 1148-1164.
57. Rasmussen, E. N., and J. M. Straka, 1998: Variations in supercell morphology. Part I: Observations of the role of upper-level storm-relative flow. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 2406-2421.
58. Rotunno, R., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The influence of the shearinduced pressure-gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 136-151.
59. Sui, C.-H., X. Li, and M.-J. Yang, 2007: On the definition of precipitation efficiency. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 4506-4513.
60. Takemi, T., 2007: Environmental stability control of the intensity of squall lines under low-level shear conditions. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24110, doi:10.1029/2007JD008793.
61. Thompson, R. L., and R. Edwards, 2000: An overview of environmental conditions and forecast implications of the 3 May 1999 tornado outbreak. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 682-699.
62. Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L. Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1243-1261.
63. Thompson, R. L., C. M. Mead, and R. Edwards, 2007: Effective storm-relative helicity and bulk shear in supercell thunderstorm environments. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 102-115.
64. Trapp, R. J., D. M. Schultz, A. V. Ryzhkov, and R. L. Holle, 2001: Multiscale structure and evolution of an Oklahoma winter precipitation event. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 486-501.
65. van den Broeke, M. S., D. M. Schultz, R. H. Johns, J. S. Evans, and J. E. Hales, 2005: Cloud-to-ground lightning producting in strongly forced, low-instability convective lines associated with damaging wind. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 517-530. van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596-1609.
66. van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596-1609.
67. Weisman, M. L., 1993: The genesis of severe, long-lived bow echoes. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 645-670.
68. Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 504-520.