Impression formation or prediction? category fit and task influence forensic person memory

Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 391-405

  Glock, Sabine ^a   Kneer, Julia ^b   Krolak Schwerdt, Sabine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dual process models; Forensic psychologists; Person memory; Prediction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DRUG DOSE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEMORY; OFFENDER; PREDICTION; RECALL; REPRODUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84855687617     PISSN: 15228932     EISSN: 15229092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2011.588529     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
3. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 1, pp. 7-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cohen, C. E. (1981). Goals and schemata in person perception: Making sense from the stream of behavior. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 45-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Dahle, K. P. (1997). Kriminalprognosen im Strafrecht-Psychologische Aspekte individueller Verhaltensvorhersagen. [Criminal prognosis in criminal law-Psychological aspects of individual behavior predictions]. In M. Steller & R. Volbert (Hrsg.), Psychologie im Strafverfahren (pp. 118-139). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
6. Dahle, K. P. (2000). Psychologische Begutachtung zur Kriminalprognose [Psychological expertise in criminal prognosis.]. In H. L. Kröber & M. Steller (Hrsg.), Psychologische Diagnostik im Strafverfahren: Indikation, Methodik und Qualitätsstandards (pp. 77-111). Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopff.
7. Dawson, V. L., Zeitz, C. M., & Wright, J. C. (1989). Expert-novice differences in person perception: Evidence of experts' sensitivities to the organization of behavior. Social Cognition, 7, 1-30.
8. Dematteo, D., Batasini, A., Foster, E., & Hunt, E. (2010). Individualizing risk assessment: Balancing ideographic and nomothetic data. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10, 360-371.
9. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155-194.
10. Fiske, S. T., Kinder, D. R., & Larter, W. M. (1983). The novice and the expert: Knowledge based strategies in political cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 381-400.
11. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model. Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York, NY: Academic Press.
13. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
14. Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
15. Glock, S., Kneer, J., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2010). Strafvollzug-Gefangene in der Vollzugspsychologie-Strategien zur Verarbeitung von Informationen im Strafvollzug und ihre Folgen [Penal system-Prisoners in forensic psychologyinformation processing strategies in penal systems and their consequences]. Kriminalistik, 64, 43-46.
16. Janus, E. S., & Prentky, R. A. (2004). Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment: How a developing science can enhance accuracy and accountability. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16, 176-181.
17. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2010). Verarbeitung von schülerbezogener Information als zielgeleiteter Prozess: Der Lehrer als "flexibler denker" [Goal-directed processing of students' attributes: The teacher as "flexible thinker"]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 175-186.
18. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & le Coutre, C. (2002). Ist das Gedächtnis für klinischdiagnostische Personmerkmale abhängig vom Verarbeitungsziel? [The processing of case reports in clinical psychology: Impact of different processing goals on person memory]. Psychologische Beiträge, 44, 428-446
19. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Rummer, R. (2005). Der Einfluss von Expertise auf den Prozess der schulischen Leistungsbeurteilung [The influence of expertise on the process of judging academic achievement]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 37, 205-213.
20. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Bridging individual, interpersonal, and institutional approaches to judgment and decision making: The impact of accountability on cognitive bias. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 431-457). Cambridge, England: University Press.
21. Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energysaving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37-47.
22. Rasch, W. (1985, 1994). Die Prognose im Strafvollzug als Kalkuliertes Risiko [Prediction in prison systems as calculated risk]. In W. Frisch & T. Vogt (Eds.), Prognoseentscheidungen in der strafrechtlichen Praxis (pp. 235-251). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
23. Ryba, N. L. (2008). The other side of equation: Considering risk state and protective factors in violence risk assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8, 413-423.
24. Stangor, C., & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
25. Van Ophuysen, S. (2006). Vergleich diagnostischer Entscheidungen von Novizen und Experten am Beispiel der Schullaufbahnempfehlung. [The comparison of novices' and experts' decisions on school placement decisions.] Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38, 154-161.