Representing and comparing protein folds and fold families using three-dimensional shape-density representations

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 530-545

  Mavridis, Lazaros ^a   Ghoorah, Anisah W ^a   Venkatraman, Vishwesh ^a   Ritchie, David W ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Protein alignment; Protein classification; Protein clustering; Protein comparison; Protein indexing; Three dimensional protein shapes; Three dimensional superpositions

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GOLD STANDARD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 84855671357     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23218     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kresge N, Simoni RD, Hill RL. The thermodynamic hypothesis of protein folding: the work of Christian Anfinsen. J Biol Chem 1980; 281: e11-e13.
2. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6: 197-208.
3. Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, Bluhm WF, Bourne PE, Burkhardt K, Feng Z, Gilliland GL, Iype L, Jain S, Fagan P, Marvin J, Padilla D, Ravichandran V, Schneider B, Thanki N, Weissig H, Westbrook JD, Zardecki C. The protein data bank. Acta Cryst 2002; D58: 899-907.
4. Chothia C, Lesk AM. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J 1986; 5: 823-826.
5. Redfern OC, Dessailly B, Orengo CA. Exploring the structure and function paradigm. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18: 394-402.
6. Cuff AL, Sillitoe I, Lewis T, Redfern OC, Garratt R, Thornton J, Orengo CA. The CATH classification revisited - architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acid Res 2009; 37: D310-D314.
7. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995; 247: 536-540.
8. Dessailly BH, Redfern OC, Cuff A, Orengo CA. Exploiting structural classifications for function prediction: towards a domain grammar for protein function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 349-356.
9. Russell RB. Classification of protein folds. Mol Biotechnol 2007; 36: 238-247.
10. Hasegawa H, Holm L. Advances and pitfalls of protein structure alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 341-348.
11. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970; 48: 443-453.
12. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981; 147: 195-197.
13. Sippl M, Wiederstein M. A note on difficult structure alignment problems. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 426-427.
14. Kolodny R, Koehl P, Levitt M. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. J Mol Biol 2005; 346: 1173-1188.
15. Ritchie D, Kemp G. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Protein Struct Funct Genet 2000; 39: 178-194.
16. Mavridis L, Ritchie DW. 3D-Blast: 3D protein structure alignment, comparison, and classification using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Biocomputing 2010; 10: 281-292.
17. Krissinel E, Henrick K. Secondary structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr 2004; D60: 2256-2268.
18. Holm L, Sander C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem Sci 1995; 20: 478-480.
19. Shindyalov I, Bourne P. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatiorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998; 11: 739-747.
20. Sael L, Li B, La D, Ramani K, Rustamov R, Kihara D. Fast protein tertiary structure retrieval based on global surface shape similarity. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 2009; 72: 1259-1273.
21. Mak L, Grandison S, Morris R. An extension of spherical harmonics to region-based rotationally invariant descriptors for molecular shape description and comparison. J Mol Graph Model 2008; 26: 1035-1045.
22. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pat Recog Lett 2006; 7: 861-874.
23. Ritchie DW. High-order analytic translation matrix elements for real-space six-dimensional polar Fourier correlations. J Appl Crystallogr 2005; 38: 808-818.
24. Carbo R, Leyda L, Arnau M. An electron density measure of the similarity between two compounds. Int J Quantum Chem 1980; 17: 1185-1189.
25. Ritchie DW, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Accelerating protein-protein docking correlations using a six-dimensional analytic FFT generating function. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 810-823.
26. Ritchie DW, Venkatraman V. Ultra-fast FFT protein docking on graphics processors. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: 2398-2405.
27. Novotni M, Klein R. Shape retrieval using 3D Zernike descriptors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2004; 36: 1047-1062.
28. Gerstein M, Levitt M. Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classification of proteins. Protein Sci 1998; 7: 445-456.
29. Sippl M. Fold space unlimited. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 312-320.
30. Ward J. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 1963; 58: 236-244.
31. Reeves GA, Dallman TJ, Redfern OC, Akpor A, Orengo CA. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database. J Mol Biol 2006; 360: 725-741.
32. Petrey D, Honig B. Is protein classification necesary? Toward alternative approaches to function annotation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 363-268.
33. Alva V, Remmert M, Biegert A, Lupas AN, Söding J. A galaxy of folds. Protein Sci 2010; 19: 124-130.