Urban biodiversity: A review of current concepts and contributions to multidisciplinary approaches

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 247-271

  Farinha Marques, P ^a   Lameiras, J M ^a   Fernandes, C ^a   Silva, S ^a   Guilherme, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Biodiversity assessment; Urban biodiversity; Urban ecology

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; KNOWLEDGE; URBAN AREA; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBANIZATION;

EID: 84855668759     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2011.592062     Document Type: Review

References (142)

1. Acar, C., Acar, H., and Eroglu, E., 2007. Evaluation of ornamental plant resources to urban biodiversity and cultural changing: a case study of residential landscapes in Trabzon city (Turkey). Building and environment, 42, 218-229.
2. Alaruikka, D., et al., 2002. Carabid beetle and spider assemblages along a forested urban-rural gradient in southern Finland. Journal of insect conservation, 6, 195-206.
3. Alberti, M., Botsford, E., and Cohen, A., 2001. Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology. In: J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly, eds. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 68-85.
4. Aldridge, J., and Sempik, J., 2002. Social and therapeutic horticulture: evidence and messages from research. Centre for Child and Family Research. Evidence issue 6.
5. Allgöwer, R., 2000. Vom Wildstrom zur Trockenaue: Natur und Geschichte der Flusslandschaft am sö dlichen Oberrhein. Ubstadt-Weiher: Verlag Regionalkultur.
6. Alther, G., 2007. From genes to habitats - effects of urbanisation and urban areas on biodiversity. Basel: University of Basel.
7. Aminzadeh, B. and Khansefid, M., 2009. A case study of urban ecological networks and a sustainable city: Tehran's metropolitan area. Urban ecosystems, 13, 23-36.
8. Andersson, E. 2006. Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecology and society, 11, 34. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art34.
9. Angold, P., et al., 2006. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Science of the total environment, 360, 196-204.
10. Araújo, M.B., 2003. The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Global ecology and biogeography, 12, 5-12.
11. Babey, S.H., Brown, E.R., and Hastert, T.A., 2005. Access to safe parks helps increase physical activity among teenagers. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.
12. Baker, P.J., et al., 2003. Factors affecting the distribution of small mammals in an urban area. Mammal review, 33, 95-100.
13. Barbosa, O., et al., 2007. Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape and urban planning, 83, 187-195.
14. Bekele, H., 2005. Urbanization and urban sprawl. Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.
15. Bierwagen, B., 2007. Connectivity in urbanizing landscapes: the importance of habitat configuration, urban area size, and dispersal. Urban ecosystems, 10, 29-42.
16. Blair, R.B. and Launer, A.E., 1997. Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological conservation, 80, 113-125.
17. Bolger, D.T., et al., 2000. Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in Southern California: area, age, and edge effects. Ecological applications, 10, 1230-1248.
18. Bolund, P. and Hunhammar, S., 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological economics, 29, 293-301.
19. Briffett, C., 2010. Is managed recreational use compatible with effective habitat and wildlife occurrence in urban open space corridors systems? Landscape research, 26 (2), 137-163.
20. Brown, K.S. and Freitas, A.V.L., 2002. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. Journal of insect conservation, 6, 217-231.
21. Bryant, M.M., 2006. Urban landscape conservation and the role of ecological greenways at local and metropolitan scales. Landscape and urban planning, 76, 23-44.
22. Clergeau, P., 1996. Urban biodiversity: is there such a thing? Le courrier du CNRS, 82, 102-104.
23. Clergeau, P., Mennechez, G., Sauvage, A., and Lemoine, A., 2001. Human perception and appreciation of birds: a motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In: R.B.R.D.J.M. Marzluff, ed. Avian ecology in an urbanizing world. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 69-88.
24. Cornelis, J. and Hermy, M., 2004. Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and urban planning, 69, 385-401.
25. Crooks, K.R., 2002. Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conservation biology, 16, 488-502.
26. Crooks, K.R., et al., 2001. Extinction and colonization of birds on habitat islands. Conservation biology, 15, 159-172.
27. Czech, B., Krausman, P.R., and Devers, P.K., 2000. Economic associations among causes of species endangerement in the United States. BioScience, 50, 593-601.
28. Daniels, G. and Kirkpatrick, J., 2006. Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biological conservation, 133, 326-335.
29. Dearborn, D.C. and Kark, S., 2010. Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conservation biology, 24, 432-440.
30. Deichsel, R., 2006. Species change in an urban setting - ground and rove beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae) in Berlin. Urban ecosystems, 9, 161-178.
31. del Saz Salazar, S. and García Menéndez, L., 2007. Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: does proximity matter? Land use policy, 24, 296-305.
32. Desender, K., et al., 2005. Rural-urban gradients and the population genetic structure of woodland ground beetles. Conservation genetics, 6, 51-62.
33. Di Giulio, M., Holderegger, R., and Tobias, S., 2009. Effects of habitat and landscape fragmentation on humans and biodiversity in densely populated landscapes. Journal of environmental management, 90, 2959-2968.
34. Di Mauro, D., Dietz, T., and Rockwood, L., 2007. Determining the effect of urbanization on generalist butterfly species diversity in butterfly gardens. Urban ecosystems, 10, 427-439.
35. Djoghlaf, A., Jessel, B., and Sukopp, H., 2010. Foreword. In: N. Müller, P. Werner, and J.G. Kelcey, eds. Urban biodiversity and design. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
36. Donnelly, R. and Marzluff, J.M., 2004. Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conservation biology, 18, 733-745.
37. EEA. 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge. 10/2006. European Environmental Agency.
38. ESPOO. 2006. Recommendations of the meeting of the European Platform for Biodiversity Research Strategy held under the Finnish Presidency of the EU. Helsinki: ESPOO.
39. Fahrig, L., 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 34, 487-515.
40. Fernández-Juricic, E., 2000. Bird community composition patterns in urban parks of Madrid: the role of age, size and isolation. Ecological research, 15, 373-383.
41. Gairola, S. and Noresah, M.S., 2010. Emerging trend of urban green space research and the implications for safeguarding biodiversity: a viewpoint. Nature and science, 8, 43-49.
42. Gaisler, J., et al., 1998. Habitat preference and flight activity of bats in a city. Journal of zoology, 244, 439-445.
43. Garden, J., et al., 2006. Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: a focus on spatially explicit processes. Austral ecology, 31, 126-148.
44. Garden, J.G., et al., 2007. Habitat structure is more important than vegetation composition for local-level management of native terrestrial reptile and small mammal species living in urban remnants: a case study from Brisbane, Australia. Austral ecology, 32, 669-685.
45. Garden, J., McAlpine, C., and Possingham, H., 2010. Multi-scaled habitat considerations for conserving urban biodiversity: native reptiles and small mammals in Brisbane, Australia. Landscape ecology, 25, 1013-1028.
46. Geneletti, D., 2003. Biodiversity impact assessment of roads: an approach based on ecosystem rarity. Environmental impact assessment review, 23, 343-365.
47. Gibb, H. and Hochuli, D.F., 2002. Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biological conservation, 106, 91-100.
48. Gilbert, O.L., 1991. The ecology of urban habitats. London: Chapman and Hall.
49. Girling, C.L. and Kellett, R., 2005. Skinny streets and green neighborhoods: design for environment and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
50. Given, D. and Meurk, C., 2000. Biodiversity of the urban environment: the importance of indigenous species and the role urban environments can play in their preservation. In: G.H. Stewart and M.E. Ignatieva, eds. Urban biodiversity and ecology as a basis for holistic planning and design: proceedings of a workshop held at Lincoln University. Christchurch, New Zealand: Wickliffe Press, 22-33.
51. Godefroid, S. and Koedam, N., 2003. How important are large vs. small forest remnants for the conservation of the woodland flora in an urban context? Global ecology and biogeography, 12, 287-298.
52. Godefroid, S. and Koedam, N., 2007. Urban plant species patterns are highly driven by density and function of built-up areas. Landscape ecology, 22, 1227-1239.
53. Green, D. and Baker, M., 2003. Urbanization impacts on habitat and bird communities in a Sonoran desert ecosystem. Landscape and urban planning, 63, 225-239.
54. Grove, J.M., et al., 2006. Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neuighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland. Society and natural resources, 19, 117-136.
55. Haines-Young, R., 2009. Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land use policy, 26, S178-S186.
56. Hamer, A. and McDonnell, M., 2008. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanizing world: a review. Biological conservation, 141, 2432-2449.
57. Hansmann, R., Hug, S., and Seeland, K., 2007. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban forestry and urban greening, 6, 213-225.
58. Hartig, T., 2003. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of environmental psychology, 23, 109-123.
59. Hermy, M. and Cornelis, J., 2000. Towards a monitoring method and a number of multifaceted and hierarchical biodiversity indicators for urban and suburban parks. Landscape and urban planning, 49, 149-162.
60. Honnay, O., et al., 1999a. The role of patch area and habitat diversity in explaining native plant species richness in disturbed suburban forest patches in northern Belgium. Diversity and distributions, 5, 129-141.
61. Honnay, O., Hermy, M., and Coppin, P., 1999b. Effects of area, age and diversity of forest patches in Belgium on plant species richness, and implications for conservation and reforestation. Biological conservation, 87, 73-84.
62. Hostetler, M. and Knowles-Yanez, K., 2003. Land use, scale, and bird distributions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Landscape and urban planning, 62, 55-68.
63. Jansson, Å. and Nohrstedt, P., 2001. Carbon sinks and human freshwater dependence in Stockholm County. Ecological economics, 39, 361-370.
64. Jarvis, P.J. and Young, C.H., 2005. The mapping of urban habitat and its evaluation. Wolverhampton: University of Wolverhampton.
65. Jim, C. and Chen, W., 2007. Consumption preferences and environmental externalities: a hedonic analysis of the housing market in Guangzhou. Geoforum, 38, 414-431.
66. Jokimäki, J. and Suhonen, J., 1998. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landscape and urban planning, 39, 253-263.
67. Kinzig, A.P., et al., 2005. The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecology and society, 10 (1), 23.
68. Kong, F., Yin, H., and Nakagoshi, N., 2007. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: a case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and urban planning, 79, 240-252.
69. Korpela, K., Kytta, M., and Hartig, T., 2002. Restorative experience, self-regulation and children's place preferences. Journal of environmental psychology, 22, 287-398.
70. Kühn, I., Brandl, R., and Klotz, S., 2004. The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evolutionary ecology research, 6, 749-764.
71. Livingston, M., Shaw, W.W., and Harris, L.K., 2003. A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of eastern Pima County, Arizona (USA). Landscape and urban planning, 64, 131-144.
72. Loram, A., et al., 2008. Urban domestic gardens (XII): the richness and composition of the flora in five UK cities. Journal of vegetation science, 19, 321-330.
73. Luck, M. and Wu, J., 2002. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape ecology, 17, 327-339.
74. Lugo, A.E., 2010. Let's not forget the biodiversity of the cities. Biotropica, 42, 576-577.
75. Marzluff, J.M., 2008. Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer: New York.
76. McIntyre, N.E., Knowles-Yánez, K., and Hope, D., 2000. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of "urban" between the social and natural sciences. Urban ecosystems, 4, 5-24.
77. McIntyre, N.E., et al., 2001. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landscape and urban planning, 52, 257-274.
78. McKinney, M., 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological conservation, 127, 247-260.
79. McKinney, M., 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban ecosystems, 11, 161-176.
80. MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
81. Melles, S., 2005. Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban habitats, 3, 25-48.
82. Menke, S. et al., 2010. Urban areas may serve as habitat and corridors for dry-adapted, heat tolerant species; an example from ants. Urban ecosystems, 14 (2), 135-163.
83. Meurk, C.D., 2003. Cities are cultural and ecological keys to biodiverse futures. In: Greening in the city: bringing biodiversity back into the urban environment. Christchurch, New Zealand: Royal New Zealand Institute of Horticulture.
84. Miller, J., 2005. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in ecology and evolution, 20, 430-434.
85. Miller, J.R. and Hobbs, R.J., 2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conservation biology, 16, 330-337.
86. Mörtberg, U.M., 2001. Resident bird species in urban forest remnants; landscape and habitat perspectives. Landscape ecology, 16, 193-203.
87. Müller, N., 2007. Distinctive characteristics of urban biodiversity. In:Cities and biodiversity: achieving the 2010 biodiversity target. Brazil: Curitiba.
88. Müller, N., 2010. Preface. In: N. Müller, P. Werner, and J.G. Kelcey, eds. Urban biodiversity and design. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
89. M̈ller, N. and Fujiwara, K., 1998. Biotope mapping and nature conservation in cities - part 2: results of the pilot study in the urban agglomeration of Tokyo (Yokohama City). Bulletin, Institute of Environmental and Technologies, Yokohama National University, 24, 97-119.
90. M̈ller, N. and Werner, P., 2010. Urban biodiversity and the case for implementing the convention on biological diversity in towns and cities. In: N. Müller, P. Werner, and J.G. Kelcey, eds. Urban biodiversity and design. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
91. Muratet, A., et al., 2007. The role of urban structures in the distribution of wasteland flora in the Greater Paris Area, France. Ecosystems, 10, 661-671.
92. Muratet, A., et al., 2008. Evaluation of floristic diversity in urban areas as a basis for habitat management. Applied vegetation science, 11, 451-460.
93. Murgui, E., 2009. Influence of urban landscape structure on bird fauna: a case study across seasons in the city of Valencia (Spain). Urban ecosystems, 12, 249-263.
94. Nielsen, T.S. and Hansen, K.B., 2007. Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health and place, 13, 839-850.
95. Niemelä, J., 1999. Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and conservation, 8, 119-131.
96. Niemelä, J., et al., 2002. Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landscape ecology, 17, 387-401.
97. Nilon, C.H., Warren, P.S., and Wolf, J., 2011. Baltimore birdscape study: identifying habitat and land-cover variables for an urban bird-monitoring project. Urban habitats, 6, in press.
98. Norberg, J., 2004. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a complex adaptive systems approach. Limnology and oceanography, 49, 1269-1277.
99. OPDM. 2004. Creating sustainable communities: greening the gateway. A green space strategy for Thames Gateway. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
100. Palomino, D. and Carrascal, L., 2007. Threshold distances to nearby cities and roads influence the bird community of a mosaic landscape. Biological conservation, 140, 100-109.
101. Pauleit, S. and Duhme, F., 2000a. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and urban planning, 52, 1-20.
102. Pauleit, S. and Duhme, F., 2000b. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and urban planning, 52, 1-20.
103. Pauleit, S., et al., 2010. Transformation of rural-urban cultural landscapes in Europe: integrating approaches from ecological, socio-economic and planning perspectives. Landscape online, 20, 1-10.
104. Petersen, L.K., et al., 2007. Urban lifestyle and urban biodiversity. A Long-Term Biodiversity, Ecosystem and Awareness Research Network, ALTERNet.
105. Pickett, S.T.A. and Cadenasso, M.L., 2008. Linking ecological and built components of urban mosaics: an open cycle of ecological design. Journal of ecology, 96, 8-12.
106. Posa, M. and Sodhi, N., 2006. Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biological conservation, 129, 256-270.
107. Ricketts, T.H., 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. The American naturalist, 158, 87-99.
108. Ricketts, T. and Imhoff, M., 2003. Biodiversity, urban areas and agriculture: locating priority ecoregions for conservation. Conservation ecology, 8 (2). Available from: http://www.consecol.org/vol8/iss2/art1.
109. Saccheri, I., et al., 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature, 392, 491-494.
110. Sadler, J.P., et al., 2006. Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban-rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. Journal of biogeography, 33, 1126-1138.
111. Sandström, U.G., Angelstam, P., and Khakee, A., 2006a. Urban comprehensive planning - identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landscape and urban planning, 75, 43-57.
112. Sandström, U.G., Angelstam, P., and Mikusinski, G., 2006b. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape and urban planning, 77, 39-53.
113. Savard, J.-P.L., Clergeau, P., and Mennechez, G., 2000. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and urban planning, 48, 131-142.
114. Small, E., Sadler, J., and Telfer, M., 2006. Do landscape factors affect brownfield carabid assemblages? Science of the total environment, 360, 205-222.
115. Smith, R.M., et al., 2005. Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landscape ecology, 20, 235-253.
116. Smith, R., et al., 2006a. Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodiversity and conservation, 15, 2415-2438.
117. Smith, R.M., et al., 2006b. Urban domestic gardens (IX): Composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biological conservation, 129, 312-322.
118. Strauss, B. and Biedermann, R., 2006. Urban brownfields as temporary habitats: driving forces for the diversity of phytophagous insects. Ecography, 29, 928-940.
119. Strohbach, M.W., Haase, D., and Kabisch, N., 2009. Birds and the city: urban biodiversity, land use, and socioeconomics. Ecology and society, 14 (2), 31. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art31.
120. TCPA. 2004. Biodiversity by design: a guide for sustainable communities. Town and Country Planning Association.
121. Thompson, C.W., 2002. Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and urban planning, 60, 59-72.
122. Tratalos, J., et al., 2007. Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and urban planning, 83, 308-317.
123. Tredici, P.D. and Pickett, S.T.A., 2010. Wild urban plants of the Northeast: a field guide. New York: Cornell University Press.
124. Turner, W.R., Nakamura, T., and Dinetti, M., 2004. Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience, 54, 585-590.
125. Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K., and Schipperijn, J., 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and urban planning, 79, 5-19.
126. Tzoulas, K. and James, P., 2010. Making biodiversity measures accessible to non-specialists: an innovative method for rapid assessment of urban biodiversity. Urban ecosystems, 13, 113-127.
127. United Nations. 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations.
128. United Nations. 2001. World urbanization prospects. The Revision. Geneva: United Nations.
129. United Nations. 2010. World urbanization prospects. The 2009 revision. New York: EaSAP Division, United Nations.
130. van den Berg, A., Koole, S., and van der Wulp, N., 2003. Environmental preference and restoration: (how) are they related? Journal of environmental psychology, 23, 135-146.
131. Verbeylen, G., et al., 2003. Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape ecology, 18, 791-805.
132. Von Der Lippe, M. and Kowarik, I., 2007. Do cities export biodiversity? Traffic as dispersal vector across urban-rural gradients. Diversity and distributions, 14, 18-25.
133. Walters, M.J., 2004. No easy way out. Conservation in practice, 5, 20-25.
134. Werner, P. and Zahner, R., 2010. Urban patterns and biological diversity: a review. Urban biodiversity and design. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 145-173.
135. White, J., et al., 2005. Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landscape and urban planning, 71, 123-135.
136. Whitford, V., Ennos, A.R., and Handley, J.F., 2001. "City form and natural process" - indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and urban planning, 57, 91-103.
137. Wilson, E.O., 2008. Making space for biodiversity in urban areas. Green City Guidelines - advice for the protection and enhancement of biodiversity in medium to high-density urban developments. Dublin: UCD Urban Institute.
138. Wittig, R., 2004. The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Europe. Urban ecosystems, 7, 323-339.
139. Wittig, R., 2010. Biodiversity of urban-industrial areas and its evaluation - a critical review. In: N.Müller, P. Werner, and J.G. Kelcey, eds. Urban biodiversity and design. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
140. Yokohari, M. and Amati, M., 2005. Nature in the city, city in the nature: case studies of the restoration of urban nature in Tokyo, Japan and Toronto, Canada. Landscape and ecological engineering, 1, 53-59.
141. Young, C., et al., 2009. Urban landscape ecology and its evaluation: a review. In: A. Dupont and H. Jacobs, eds. Landscape ecology research trends. New York: Nova Science, 45-69.
142. Zerbe, S., et al., 2003. Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landscape and urban planning, 62, 139-148.