The role of urban structures in the distribution of wasteland flora in the Greater Paris area, France

Ecosystems

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 661-671

  Muratet, Audrey ^a   Machon, Nathalie ^a   Jiguet, Frédéric ^a   Moret, Jacques ^a   Porcher, Emmanuelle ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Hauts de Seine; Indigeneity; Isolation by distance; Land use pattern; Plant diversity; Rarity; Urbanization

Indexed keywords

FLORISTICS; LAND USE CHANGE; RARITY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION; WASTELAND;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; HAUTS-DE-SEINE; ILE-DE-FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34648822103     PISSN: 14329840     EISSN: 14350629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9047-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Conseil Scientifique Régional du Patrimoine Naturel (CSRPN IdF), Direction Régionale de l'Environnement d'Ile-de-France (DIREN IdF). 2002. Guide méthodologique pour la création de Zone Naturelle d'Intérêt Ecologique, Faunistique et Floristique (ZNIEFF) en Ile-de-France. Direction Régionale de l'Environnement d'Ile-de-France, Cachan
2. Davis AM, Glick TF. 1978. Urban ecosystems and island biogeography. Environ Conserv 5:299-304
3. Ellenberg H. 1979. Indicator values of vascular plants in Central Europe. Scr Geobot 9:7-122
4. Gödde M, Richarz N, Walter B. 1995. Habitat conservation and the development in the city of Düsseldorf, Germany. In: Sukopp H, Numata M, Huber A, Eds. Urban Ecology as the Basis of Urban Planning. The Hague, SPB Academic Publishers p 163-71
5. Godefroid S, Monbaliu D, Koedam N. 2007. The role of soil and microclimatic variables in the distribution patterns of urban wasteland flora in Brussels. Belgium, Landscape Urban Plan 80:45-55
6. Grumbine RE. 1990. Viable populations, reserve size, and federal lands management: a critique. Conserv Biol 4: 127-34
7. Harrison C, Davies G. 2002. Conserving biodiversity that matters: practitioners' perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. J Environ Manage 65:95-108
8. Herbst H, Herbst V. 2006. The development of an evaluation method using a geographic information system to determine the importance of wasteland sites as urban wildlife areas. Landsc Urban Plan 77:178-195
9. Horn HS. 1974. The ecology of secondary succession. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:25-37
10. Hurtt GC, Pacala SW. 1995. The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants. J Theor Biol 176:1-12
11. INSEE. 1999. National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies. http://www.insee.fr
12. IAURIF. 2003. Institute for Planning and Development of the Paris Ile-de-France Region. http://www.iaurif.org
13. Kowarik I.1995. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: Pysek P, Prach K, Rejmànek M, Wade M, Eds. Plant Invasions: General aspects and special problems. SPB Academic publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 15-38
14. MapInfo, MapInfo corporation 2004. MapInfo professional version 7.8
15. Maurer U, Peschel T, Schmitz S. 2000. The flora of selected urban land-use types in Berlin and Potsdam with regard to nature conservation in cities. Landsc Urban Plan 46:209-215
16. McDonnell M., Pickett S., 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232-1237
17. McNally R. 2002. Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodivers Conserv 11:1397-1401
18. Muratet A. 2006. Diversité végétale en milieu urbain. L'exemple des Hauts-de-Seine. PhD-Thesis. University of Paris VI. 121 p
19. Oksanen J, Kindt R, O'Hara RB. 2005. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.6-9
20. Peet RK, Glenn-Lewin DC, Wolf JW. 1983. Prediction of man's impact on plant species diversity. In: Holzner W, Werger MJA, Ikusima I, Eds. Man's impact on vegetation. The Hague: Dr W. Junk Publishers, pp. 1-54
21. Pysek P. 1998. Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. J Biogeogr 25:155-63
22. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
23. Rebele F. 1994. Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecol Biogeogr 4:173-187
24. Rexstad E, Burnham KP. 1991. User's guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Abundance estimation of closed animal populations. Fort Collins: Colorado State University
25. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity Distribut 6:93
26. Sukopp H, Werner P. 1987. Développement de la faune et de la flore en territoire urbain. Strasbourg: Conseil de l'Europe. 61p
27. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Doledec S, Olivier J-M. 1997. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 7:75-83
28. Walsh C, MacNally R. 2004. hier.part: Hierarchical Partitioning. Version 1.0.: R package
29. Whitfield J. 2002. Neutrality versus the niche. Nature 417:480-481
30. Zerbe S, Maurer U, Schmitz S, Sukopp H. 2003. Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 62:139-148