Regression and ANN models for estimating minimum value of machining performance

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1477-1492

  Zain, Azlan Mohd ^a   Haron, Habibollah ^a   Qasem, Sultan Noman ^a   Sharif, Safian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

ANN; End milling; Minimum surface roughness; Modeling; Regression

Indexed keywords

ANN; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DEVELOPED MODEL; EFFECTIVE PARAMETERS; END MILLING; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; MACHINING PERFORMANCE; MACHINING PROCESS; MINIMUM SURFACES; MINIMUM VALUE; MODELING APPROACH; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS; QUALITY OF MACHINED SURFACE; REGRESSION;

COMMINUTION; MACHINING CENTERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MILLING (MACHINING); MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 84855668142     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.035     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lin J.T., Bhattacharyya D., Kecman V. Multiple regression and neural networks analyses in composites machining. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63:539-548.
2. Tosun N., Ozler L. A study of tool life in hot machining using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2002, 124:99-104.
3. Kanlayasiri K., Boonmung S. Effects of wire-EDM machining variables on surface roughness of newly developed DC 53 die steel: design of experiments and regression model. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 192-193:459-464.
4. Caydas U., Hascalik A. A study on surface roughness in abrasive waterjet machining process using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 202:574-582.
5. Mukherjee I., Ray P.K. A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2006, 50:15-34.
6. Ozel T., Karpat Y. Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2005, 45:467-479.
7. Rao K.M., Rangajanardhaa G., Hanumantha R.D., Sreenivasa R.M. Development of hybrid model and optimization of surface roughness in electric discharge machining using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209:1512-1520.
8. Chen H.C., Lin J.C., Yang Y.K., Tsai C.H. Optimization of wire electrical discharge machining for pure tungsten using a neural network integrated simulated annealing approach. Expert Systems Appl. 2010, 37:7147-7153.
9. Nalbant M., Gökkaya H., Toktaş I., Sur G. The experimental investigation of the effects of uncoated, PVD- and CVD-coated cemented carbide inserts and cutting parameters on surface roughness in CNC turning and its prediction using artificial neural networks. Robot. Comput.-Int. Manuf. 2009, 25:211-223.
10. Karayel D. Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209:3125-3137.
11. Muthukrishnan N., Davim J.P. Optimization of machining parameters of Al/SiC-MMC with ANOVA and ANN analysis. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209:225-232.
12. Venkatesan D., Kannan K., Saravanan R. A genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network model for the optimization of machining processes. Neural Comput. Appl. 2009, 18:135-140.
13. Oktem H. An integrated study of surface roughness for modelling and optimization of cutting parameters during end milling operation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2009, 43:852-861.
14. Correa M., Bileza C., Pamies-Teixeira J. Comparison of Bayesian networks and artificial neural networks for quality detection in machining process. Expert Systems Appl. 2009, 36:7270-7279.
15. Topal E.S. The role of stepover ratio in prediction of surface roughness in flat end milling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2009, 51:782-789.
16. Aykut S., Demetgul M., Tansel I.N. Selection of optimum cutting condition of cobalt-based superalloy with GONNS. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 46:957-967.
17. Muñoz-Escalona P., Maropoulos P.G. Artificial neural network for surface roughness prediction when face milling Al 7075-T7351. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2010, 19:185-193.
18. Zain A.M., Haron H., Sharif S. Prediction of surface roughness in the end milling machining using artificial neural network. Expert Systems Appl. 2010, 37:1755-1768.
19. Tsai Y.H., Chen J.C., Luu S.J. An in-process surface recognition system based on neural networks in end milling cutting operations. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1999, 39:583-605.
20. A.S. Mohruni, Performance Evaluation of Uncoated and Coated Carbide Tools When End Milling of Titanium Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology, Thesis Doctor of Philosophy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia, 2008.
21. Yeo S.H., Rahman M., Wong Y.S. Towards enhancement of machinability data by multiple regression. J. Mech. Work. Technol. 1989, 19:85-99.
22. Sanjay C., Jyothi C. A study of surface roughness in drilling using mathematical analysis and neural networks. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 29:846-852.
23. Zain A.M., Haron H., Sharif S. Application of GA to optimize cutting conditions for minimizing surface roughness in end milling machining process. Expert Systems Appl. 2010, 37:4650-4659.
24. Zain A.M., Haron H., Sharif S. Simulated annealing to estimate the optimal cutting conditions for minimizing surface roughness in end milling Ti-6Al-4V. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2010, 14:43-62.