Growth rate-dependent control in Enterococcus faecalis: Effects on the transcriptome and proteome, and strong regulation of lactate dehydrogenase

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 170-176

  Mehmeti, Ibrahim ^a   Faergestad, Ellen M ^b   Bekker, Martijn ^c   Snipen, Lars ^a   Nes, Ingolf F ^a   Holo, Helge ^a,d  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d TINE SA   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; GENE PRODUCTS; GENE TRANSCRIPTS; HIGH GROWTH RATE; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; LOW GROWTH RATE; METABOLIC PROFILES; POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATIONS; PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE PCR; RATE DEPENDENCE; STRONG GROWTH; THREE ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; TRANSCRIPTOMES;

AMINO ACIDS; BACILLI; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GLUCOSE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION;

GROWTH RATE;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BACTERIAL RNA; ISOENZYME; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE 1; PROTEOME; TRANSCRIPTOME;

AMINO ACID; BACTERIUM; CHEMOSTAT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERMENTATION; GROWTH RATE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEOMICS;

ARTICLE; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DNA MICROARRAY; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METABOLOME; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEOMICS;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; ISOENZYMES; L-LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; METABOLOME; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; RNA, BACTERIAL; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS;

EID: 84855650408     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06604-11     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alexeeva S, de Kort B, Sawers G, Hellingwerf KJ, de Mattos MJ. 2000. Effects of limited aeration and of the ArcAB system on intermediary pyruvate catabolism in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 182:4934-4940.
2. Barcelona-Andrés B, Marina A, Rubio V. 2002. Gene structure, organization, expression, and potential regulatory mechanisms of arginine catabolism in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 184:6289-6300.
3. Boer VM, de Winde JH, Pronk JT, Piper MDW. 2003. The genome-wide transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on glucose in aerobic chemostat cultures limited for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or sulfur. J. Biol. Chem. 278:3265-3274.
4. Deutscher J. 2008. The mechanisms of carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11:87-93.
5. Dressaire C, et al. 2009. Transcriptome and proteome exploration to model translation efficiency and protein stability in Lactococcus lactis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000606.
6. Dressaire C, et al. 2008. Growth rate regulated genes and their wide involvement in the Lactococcus lactis stress responses. BMC Genomics 9:343.
7. Even S, Garrigues C, Loubiere P, Lindley ND, Cocaign-Bousquet M. 1999. Pyruvate metabolism in Lactococcus lactis is dependent upon glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. Metab. Eng. 1:198-205.
8. Even S, Lindley ND, Cocaign-Bousquet M. 2003. Transcriptional, translational and metabolic regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG 1363 grown in continuous acidic cultures. Microbiology 149:1935-1944.
9. Fiedler T, et al. 2011. Characterization of three lactic acid bacteria and their isogenic ldh deletion mutants shows optimization for YATP (cell mass produced per mole of ATP) at their physiological pHs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:612-617.
10. Garrigues C, Loubiere P, Lindley ND, Cocaign-Bousquet M. 1997. Control of the shift from homolactic acid to mixed-acid fermentation in Lactococcus lactis: predominant role of the NADH/NAD+ ratio. J. Bacteriol. 179:5282-5287.
11. Gourse RL, Gaal T, Bartlett MS, Appleman JA, Ross W. 1996. rRNA transcription and growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in Escherichia coli. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50:645-677.
12. Jensen NB, Melchiorsen CR, Jokumsen KV, Villadsen J. 2001. Metabolic behavior of Lactococcus lactis MG1363 in microaerobic continuous cultivation at a low dilution rate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2677-2682.
13. Jönsson M, Saleihan Z, Nes IF, Holo H. 2009. Construction and characterization of three lactate dehydrogenase-negative Enterococcus faecalis V583 mutants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:4901-4903.
14. Kramer G, et al. 2010. Proteome-wide alterations in Escherichia coli translation rates upon anaerobiosis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9:2508-2516.
15. Leboeuf C, Leblanc L, Auffray Y, Hartke A. 2000. Characterization of the ccpA gene of Enterococcus faecalis: identification of starvation-inducible proteins regulated by CcpA. J. Bacteriol. 182:5799-5806.
16. Lemke JJ, et al. 2011. Direct regulation of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein promoters by the transcription factors ppGpp and DksA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:5712-5717.
17. Levy S, Barkai N. 2009. Coordination of gene expression with growth rate: a feedback or a feed-forward strategy? FEBS Lett. 583:3974-3978.
18. Mehmeti I., et al. 2011. Transcriptome, proteome, and metabolite analyses of a lactate dehydrogenase-negative mutant of Enterococcus faecalis V583. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:2406-2413.
19. Melchiorsen RC, Jokumsen KV, Villadsen J, Israelsen H, Arnau J. 2002. The level of pyruvate-formate lyase controls the shift from homolactic to mixed-acid product formation in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58:338-344.
20. Molenaar D, van Berlo R, de Ridder D, Teusink B. 2009. Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5:323.
21. 14C-labeled substrates between catabolic and anabolic pathways. J. Bacteriol. 182:1136-1143.
22. Opsata M, Nes IF, Holo H. 2010. Class IIa bacteriocin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis V583: the mannose PTS operon mediates global transcriptional responses. BMC Microbiol. 10:224.
23. Papagianni M, Avramidis N, Filiousis G. 2007. Glycolysis and the regulation of glucose transport in Lactococcus lactis spp. lactis in batch and fed-batch culture. Microb. Cell Fact. 6:16.
24. Picard F, Dressaire C, Girbal L, Cocaign-Bousquet M. 2009. Examination of post-transcriptional regulations in prokaryotes by integrative biology. C. R. Biol. 332:958-973.
25. Regenberg B, et al. 2006. Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 7:R107.
26. Sahm DF, et al. 1989. In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycinresistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33: 1588-1591.
27. Sivakanesan R, Dawes EA. 1980. Anaerobic glucose and serine metabolism in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 118:143-157.
28. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS. 2005. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 21:2067-2075.
29. Solheim M, Aakra A, Vebo H, Snipen L, Nes IF. 2007. Transcriptional responses of Enterococcus faecalis V583 to bovine bile and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5767-5774.
30. Stuart MR, Chou LS, Weimer BC. 1999. Influence of carbohydrate starvation and arginine on culturability and amino acid utilization of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:665-673.
31. Thomas TD, Ellwood DC, Longyear VMC. 1979. Change from homo- to heterolactic fermentation by Streptococcus lactis resulting from glucose limitation in anaerobic chemostat cultures. J. Bacteriol. 138:109-117.
32. Ward DE, et al. 2000. Branched-chain alpha-keto acid catabolism via the gene products of the bkd operon in Enterococcus faecalis: a new, secreted metabolite serving as a temporary redox sink. J. Bacteriol. 182:3239-3246.