Electrophysiological correlates of associative learning in smokers: A higher-order conditioning experiment

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Littel, Marianne ^a   Franken, Ingmar H A ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; LEARNING; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SELF REPORT; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SMOKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855593224     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-8     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Davis JA, Gould TJ. Associative learning, the hippocampus, and nicotine addiction. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2008, 1(1):9-19.
2. Hyman SE. Addiction: A Disease of Learning and Memory. Am J Psychiatry 2005, 162(8):1414-1422. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1414, 16055762.
3. Poulos CX, Hinson RE, Siegel S. The role of Pavlovian processes in drug tolerance and dependence: Implications for treatment. Addict Behav 1981, 6(3):205-211. 10.1016/0306-4603(81)90018-6, 7293843.
4. O'Brien CP, O'Brien TJ, Mintz J, Brady JP. Conditioning of narcotic abstinence symptoms in human subjects. Drug Alcohol Depend 1975, 1(2):115-123. 10.1016/0376-8716(75)90013-7, 1235105.
5. Torregrossa MM, Corlett PR, Taylor JR. Aberrant learning and memory in addiction. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2011,
6. Drummond DC. What does cue-reactivity have to offer clinical research?. Addiction 2000, 95(8s2):129-144.
7. Drummond DC, Raye ZL, Cherry L, Walter AH. Craving research: future directions. Addiction 2000, 95(8s2):247-255.
8. Thewissen R, van den Hout M, Havermans RC, Jansen A. Context-dependency of cue-elicited urge to smoke. Addiction 2005, 100(3):387-396. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00996.x, 15733252.
9. Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 1999, 94(3):327-340. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9433273.x, 10605857.
10. Everitt BJ, Dickinson A, Robbins TW. The neuropsychological basis of addictive behaviour. Brain Res Rev 2001, 36(2-3):129-138. 10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00088-1, 11690609.
11. Gewirtz JC, Davis M. Using Pavlovian Higher-Order Conditioning Paradigms to Investigate the Neural Substrates of Emotional Learning and Memory. Learn Memory 2000, 7(5):257-266.
12. Schindler C, Panlilio L, Goldberg S. Second-order schedules of drug self-administration in animals. Psychopharmacology 2002, 163(3):327-344. 10.1007/s00213-002-1157-4, 12373434.
13. White NM. Addictive drugs as reinforcers: multiple partial actions on memory systems. Addiction 1996, 91(7):921-950. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb03586.x, 8688822.
14. Robbins T, Ersche K, Everitt B. Drug Addiction and the Memory Systems of the Brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1141(1):1-21. 10.1196/annals.1441.020, 18991949.
15. Grabus SD, Martin BR, Batman AM, Tyndale RF, Sellers E, Damaj MI. Nicotine physical dependence and tolerance in the mouse following chronic oral administration. Psychopharmacology 2005, 178(2):183-192. 10.1007/s00213-004-2007-3, 15365686.
16. Le Foll B, Goldberg S. Nicotine as a typical drug of abuse in experimental animals and humans. Psychopharmacology 2006, 184(3):367-381. 10.1007/s00213-005-0155-8, 16205918.
17. Caggiula AR, Donny EC, White AR, Chaudhri N, Booth S, Gharib MA, Hoffman A, Perkins KA, Sved AF. Cue dependency of nicotine self-administration and smoking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2001, 70(4):515-530. 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00676-1, 11796151.
18. Goldberg SR, Spealman RD, Goldberg DM. Persistent behavior at high rates maintained by intravenous self-administration of nicotine. Science 1981, 214(4520):573-575. 10.1126/science.7291998, 7291998.
19. Spealman RD, Goldberg SR. Maintenance of schedule-controlled behavior by intravenous injections of nicotine in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1982, 223(2):402-408.
20. Bevins RA, Palmatier MI. Extending the role of associative learning processes in nicotine addiction. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2004, 3:143-158. 10.1177/1534582304272005, 15653812.
21. Chiamulara C. Cue reactivity in nicotine and tobacco dependence: a "multiple-action" model of nicotine as a primary reinforcement and as an enhancer ofthe effects of smoking-associated stimuli. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005, 48:74-97.
22. Lazev AB, Herzog TA, Brandon TH. Classical Conditioning of Environmental Cues to Cigarette Smoking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1999, 7(1):56-63.
23. Dols M, Willems B, van den Hout M, Bittoun R. Smokers can learn to influence their urge to smoke. Addict Behav 2000, 25(1):103-108. 10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00115-4, 10708324.
24. Dols M, Hout M, Kindt M, Willems B. The urge to smoke depends on the expectation of smoking. Addiction 2002, 97(1):87-93. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00010.x, 11895274.
25. Thewissen R, Havermans RC, Geschwind N, van den Hout M, Jansen A. Pavlovian conditioning of an approach bias in low-dependent smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007, 194(1):33-39.
26. Field M, Duka T. Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues. Behav Pharmacol 2001, 12(3):183-194. 10.1097/00008877-200105000-00004, 11485055.
27. Mucha RF, Pauli P, Angrilli A. Conditioned responses elicited by experimentally produced cues for smoking. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1998, 76(3):259-268. 10.1139/y98-022, 9673789.
28. Winkler MH, Weyers P, Mucha RF, Stippekohl B, Stark R, Pauli P. Conditioned cues for smoking elicit preparatory responses in healthy smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2010,
29. Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Duka T. Discriminative stimuli that control instrumental tobacco-seeking by human smokers also command selective attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2003, 168(4):435-445.
30. Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Duka T. The associative basis of cue-elicited drug taking in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2010, 208(3):337-351.
31. Hogarth L, Duka T. Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?. Psychopharmacology 2006, 184(3):553-566. 10.1007/s00213-005-0150-0, 16175406.
32. Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Wright A, Kouvaraki M, Duka T. The role of drug expectancy in the control of human drug seeking. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2007, 33(4):484-496.
33. Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ. Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol 2000, 52(2):95-111. 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7, 10699350.
34. Hajcak G, MacNamara A, Olvet DM. Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Dev Neuropsychol 2010, 35(2):129-155. 10.1080/87565640903526504, 20390599.
35. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action 1997, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
36. Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Cacioppo JT, Ito T, Lang PJ. Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 2000, 37(2):257-261. 10.1111/1469-8986.3720257, 10731776.
37. Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J. Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol 2008, 77(3):247-265. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006, 2443061, 18164800.
38. Franken IH, Stam CJ, Hendriks VM, van den Brink W. Neurophysiological evidence for abnormal cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2003, 170(2):205-212.
39. Franken IH, Hulstijn KP, Stam CJ, Hendriks VM, van den Brink W. Two new neurophysiological indices of cocaine craving: evoked brain potentials and cue modulated startle reflex. J Psychopharmacol 2004, 18(4):544-552. 10.1177/0269881104047282, 15582921.
40. Herrmann MJ, Weijers H-G, Wiesbeck GA, Aranda D, Böning J, Fallgatter AJ. Event-Related Potentials and Cue-Reactivity in Alcoholism. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2000, 24(11):1724-1729.
41. Herrmann MJ, Weijers H-G, Wiesbeck GA, Böning J, Fallgatter AJ. Alcohol cue-reactivity in heavy and light social drinkers as revealed by event-related potentials. Alcohol Alcohol 2001, 36(6):588-593.
42. Wölfling K, Flor H, Grüsser SM. Psychophysiological responses to drug-associated stimuli in chronic heavy cannabis use. Eur J Neurosci 2008, 27(4):976-983. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06051.x, 18333968.
43. Littel M, Franken IH. The effects of prolonged abstinence on the processing of smoking cues: an ERP study among smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers. J Psychopharm 2007, 21(8):873-882.
44. Littel M, Franken IH. Implicit and explicit selective attention to smoking cues in smokers indexed by brain potentials. J Psychopharm 2010, 25(4):503-513.
45. McDonough BE, Warren CA. Effects of 12-h tobacco deprivation on event-related potentials elicited by visual smoking cues. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001, 154(3):282-291.
46. Warren CA, McDonough BE. Event-related brain potentials as indicators of smoking cue-reactivity. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110(9):1570-1584. 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00089-9, 10479024.
47. Field M, Munafo M, Franken IH. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. PsyB 2009, 135(4):589-607.
48. Franken IH, Van Strien JW, Bocanegra BR, Huijding J. The P3 event-related potential as an index of motivational relevance: a conditioning experiment. J Psychophysiol 2011, 25:32-39.
49. Potts GF. An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Brain Cogn 2004, 56(1):5-13. 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.03.006, 15380870.
50. Delplanque S, Lavoie ME, Hot P, Silvert L, Sequeira H. Modulation of cognitive processing by emotional valence studied through event-related potentials in humans. Neurosci Lett 2004, 356(1):1-4. 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.014, 14746887.
51. Carretie L, Hinojosa JA, Martin-Loeches M, Mercado F, Tapia M. Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates. Hum Brain Mapp 2004, 22(4):290-299. 10.1002/hbm.20037, 15202107.
52. Vink JM, Willemsen G, Beem AL, Boomsma DI. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence in a Dutch sample of daily smokers and ex-smokers. Addict Behav 2005, 30(3):575-579. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.05.023, 15718074.
53. Lang PJ. The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. Am Psychol 1995, 50(5):372-385.
54. ACNS American clinical neurophysiology society guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 23:, 107-110. ACNS.
55. Jurcak V, Tsuzuki D, Dan I. 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. NeuroImage 2007, 34(4):1600-1611. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.024, 17207640.
56. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983, 55(4):468-484. 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9, 6187540.