Three component stakeholder analysis

International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 318-333

  Kivits, Robbert Anton ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Methodology; Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholder engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855543000     PISSN: 18340806     EISSN: 18340814     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/mra.2011.5.3.318     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Achterkamp, M., & Vos, J. (2007). Critically Identifying Stakeholders. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24(1), 3-14.
2. Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153-190.
3. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.
4. Amaeshi, K. M., & Crane, A. (2006). Stakeholder Engagement: A Mechanism for Sustainable Aviation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(5), 245-260.
5. Ansell, C. (2003). Community Embeddedness and Collaborative Governance in the San
6. Francisco Bay Area Environmental Movement. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action (pp. 123-146). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Ashworth, R., & Skelcher, C. (2005). Meta-evaluation of the Local Government Modernisation Agenda: Progress Report on Stakeholder Engagement with Local Government. Retrieved from http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/142922.pdf.
8. Barry, J., & Proops, J. (1999). Seeking Sustainability Discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics, 28(3), 337-345.
9. Beach, S. (2009). Who or What Decides how Stakeholders are Optimally Engaged by Governance Networks Delivering Public Outcomes? Paper presented at the IRSPM XIII.
10. Biggs, S., & Matsaert, H. (1999). An Actor-oriented Approach for Strengthening Research and Development Capabilities in Natural Resource Systems. Public Administration and Development, 19(3), 231-262.
11. Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221-236.
12. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 version 6.232: Software for Social Network Analysis. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
13. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. Yale: Yale University Press.
14. Brown, S. R. (1993). A Primer on Q Methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91-138.
15. Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do When Stakeholders Matter. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53.
16. Bunn, M. D., Savage, G. T., & Holloway, B. B. (2002). Stakeholder Analysis for Multi-Sector Innovations. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 17(2/3), 181 - 203.
17. Butts, C. T. (2008). A Relational Event Framework for Social Action Sociological Methodology, 38(1), 155-200.
18. Cameron, B. G., Crawley, E. F., Loureiro, G., & Rebentisch, E. S. (2008). Value Flow Mapping: Using Networks to Inform Stakeholder Analysis. Acta Astronautica, 62(4-5), 324-333.
19. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92 - 117.
20. Combes, H., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2004). Using Q-Methodology to Involve People with Intellectual Disability in Evaluating Person-Centred Planning. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(3), 149-159.
21. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147-168.
22. Crocker, J. T. (2007). Organizational Arrangements for the Provision of Cross-Boundary Transport Infrastructure and Services. Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia.
23. Dale, A. P., & Lane, M. B. (1994). Strategic Perspectives Analysis: A Procedure for Participatory and Political Social Impact Assessment. Society and Natural Resources, 7, 253-267.
24. de Bruijn, H., & ten Heuvelhof, E. (2000). Networks and Decision Making (1st ed.). Utrecht: Lemma.
25. de Bruijn, H., & ten Heuvelhof, E. (2004). Process Arrangements for Variety, Retention, and Selection. [10.1007/s12130-004-1017-0]. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 16(4), 91-108.
26. de Haan, A. R. C. (2007). Aircraft Technology's Contribution to Sustainable Development. Delft University of Technology, Delft.
27. De Lopez, T. T. (2001). Stakeholder Management for Conservation Projects: A Case Study of Ream National Park, Cambodia. Environmental Management, 28, 47-60.
28. Deelstra, Y., Nooteboom, S. G., Kohlmann, H. R., van den Berg, J., & Innanen, S. (2003). Using Knowledge for Decision-making Purposes in the Context of Large Projects in The Netherlands. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(5), 517-541.
29. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management, 20(1), 65-92.
30. Dryzek, J. S., & Berejikian, J. (1993). Reconstructive Democratic Theory. The American Political Science Review, 87(1), 48-60.
31. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy: The journey of strategic management. London: Sage Publications.
32. Freeman, A. M. (1994). Depletable Externalities and Pigovian Taxation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 11, 173-179.
33. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
34. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing Stakeholder Theory. [Article]. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1-21.
35. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and Communication Practice. Journal of Communication Management, 9(1), 95-97.
36. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 191 - 205.
38. Gasper, D., & Apthorpe, R. (1996). Introduction: Discourse Analysis and Policy Discourse. The European Journal of Development Research, 8(1), 1 - 15.
39. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.
40. Hare, M., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Stakeholder Categorization in Participatory Integrated Assessment Processes. Integrated Assessment, 3(1), 50-62.
41. Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach us in the Post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 247-265.
42. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage: Toward a Theory of Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 9-26.
43. Jeffares, S., & Skelcher, C. (2008). Democratic Subjectivities in Network Governance: Using web-enabled Q-methodology with European public managers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference Group for Public Administration.
44. Jones, T. M. (1993). Ethical Decision-making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.
45. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404 - 437.
46. Jonker, J., & Foster, D. (2002). Stakeholder Excellence? Framing the Evolution and Complexity of a Stakeholder Perspective of the Firm. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 187 - 195.
47. Keast, R. L. (2003). Integrated Public Services: The Role of Networked Arrangements. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
48. Keast, R. L., & Hampson, K. (2007). Building Constructive Innovation Networks: Role of Relationship Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(5), 364-373.
49. Klijn, E.-H., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2007). Trust in Governance Networks: Its Impact and Manageability. Paper presented at the 9th Public Management Research Association Conference.
50. Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing Networks in the Public Sector: A Theoretical Study of Management Strategies in Policy Networks. Public Administration, 73(3), 437-454.
51. Kroesen, M., & Broer, C. (2009). Policy Discourse, People's Internal Frames, and Declared Aircraft Noise Annoyance: An Application of Q-Methodology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), 195-207.
52. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189.
53. Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models in Collaborative Policymaking. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 491-504.
54. Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network Data and Measurement. In W. R. Scott & J. Blake (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology (Vol. 16, pp. 435-463). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
55. Martinez-Moyano, I. J., Samsa, M. E., Baldwin, T. E., Willke, B. J., & Moore, A. P. (2008). Investigating the Dynamics of Trust in Government: Drivers and Effects of Policy Initiatives and Government Action.
56. Mattingly, J. E., & Greening, D. W. (2002). Public-interest Groups as Stakeholders: A 'Stakeholder Salience' Explanation of Activism. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted & S. S. Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement (pp. 266-279). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
57. McLaughlin, M. W. (2005). Listening and Learning from the Field: Tales of Policy Implementation and Situated Practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The Roots of Educational Change (pp. 58-72): Springer, Netherlands.
58. Mendelow, A. (1991). Proposed Model on Stakeholder Ranking. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA.
59. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 853-886.
60. Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder Engagement, Discourse Ethics and Strategic Management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39-49.
61. Olsson, A. R. (2009). Relational Rewards and Communicative Planning: Understanding Actor Motivation. Planning Theory, 8(3), 263-281.
62. Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological Transformation for Ecosystem Management: The Development of Adaptive Co-management of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecology and Society, 9(4), 1-26.
63. Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1-23.
64. Pejovich, S. (1990). The Economics of Property Rights; Toward a Theory of Comparative Systems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
65. Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2007). Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Sustainability Research Institute, 1-21.
66. Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources, 22(6), 501-518.
67. Ramirez, R. (1998). Stakeholder Analysis and Conflict Management. In? (Ed.).
68. Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., et al. (2009). Who's in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949.
69. Ring, P. S. (1994). Fragile and Resilient Trust and their Roles in Cooperative Inter-organizational Relationships. In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (pp. 107-113). San Diego.
70. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
71. Rowley, T. J. (2000). Does Relational Context Matter? An Empirical Test of a Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. In J. Logsdon, Wood, D., Benson, L. (Ed.), Research in Stakeholder Theory, 1997-1998: The Sloan Foundation Minigrant Project. Toronto: The Sloan Foundation Minigrant Project, Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics.
72. Ryan, N. F., Head, B., Keast, R. L., & Brown, K. A. (2006). Engaging Indigenous Communities: Towards a Policy Framework for Indigenous Community Justice Programs. Social Policy & Administration, 40(3), 304-321.
73. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. H., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 61-75.
74. Schlossberger, E. (1994). A New Model of Business: Dual-investor Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 459-474.
75. Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
76. Shandas, V., & Messer, W. B. (2008). Fostering Green Communities Through Civic Engagement: Community-Based Environmental Stewardship in the Portland Area. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), 408 - 418.
77. Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The Public Governance of Collaborative Spaces: Discourse, Design and Democracy. Public Administration, 83(3), 573-596.
78. Sobel, J. (2002). Can We Trust Social Capital? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 139-154.
79. Torfing, J., Sorensen, E., & Fotel, T. (2009). Democratic Anchorage of Infrastructural Governance Networks: the Case of the Femern Belt Forum. Planning Theory, 8(3), 282-308.
80. van de Riet, O. A. W. T. (2003). Policy Analysis in Multi-Actor Policy Settings: Navigating Between Negotiated Nonsense and Superfluous Knowledge (1st ed.). Delft: Eburon Publishers.
81. van Eeten, M. J. G. (2001). Recasting Intractable Policy Issues: The Wider Implications of the Netherlands Civil Aviation Controversy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(3), 391-414.
82. van Eeten, M. J. G., Loucks, D., & Roe, E. (2002). Bringing Actors Together Around Large-Scale Water Systems: Participatory Modeling and Other Innovations. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 14(4), 94-108.
83. van Huijstee, M., & Glasbergen, P. (2008). The Practice of Stakeholder Dialogue Between Multinationals and NGOs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(5), 298-310.
84. Verbong, G. P. J., Geels, F. W., & Raven, R. P. J. M. (2008). Multi-niche Analysis of Dynamics and Policies in Dutch Renewable Energy Innovation Journeys (1970 - 2006): Hype-cycles, Closed Networks and Technology-focused Learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 555-573.
85. Watts, D. J. (2003). Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
86. Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2007). Guidance on the Use of Q Method for Evaluation of Public Involvement Programs at Contaminated Sites. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.