What are data? The many kinds of data and their implications for data re-use

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 635-651

  Carlson, Samuelle ^a   Anderson, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PROGRAM; DATA PROVENANCE; DATA QUALITY; DATA REUSE; E-SCIENCES; HETEROGENEOUS DATA; KEY FEATURE; LIFE STAGES; PROCESSABLE; TACIT KNOWLEDGE;

E-SCIENCE;

EID: 33847329752     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00342.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Becher, T. (1987). The disciplinary shaping of the profession. In B. Clark (Ed.), The Academic Profession (pp. 271-301). Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Birnholtz, J., & Bietz, M. (2003, November). Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. Paper presented at the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida.
3. Borgman, C. (2005, July). Disciplinary differences in e-research: An information perspective. Paper presented at the First International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester, UK.
4. Bowers, J. (1994, October). The work to make a network work: Studying CSCW in action. Paper presented at the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
5. Brenneis, D., & Marcus, G. E. (2005). In between, and on the margins of, the shining centres on the hill. Anthropology News, 46(6), 8-12.
6. Campbell E. G., Clarridge B. R., Gokhale M., Birenbaum L., Hilgartner S., Holtzman, N. A., et al. 2002). Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(4), 473-480.
7. Chen, L. (2005, September). A proof of concept: Provenance in a service oriented architecture. Paper presented at the proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, UK.
8. Coopmans, C. (2006). Making mammograms mobile. Suggestions for a sociology of data mobility. Information, Communication & Society, 9(1), 1-19.
9. Corti, L. (2000). Progress and problems of preserving and providing access to qualitative data for social research-The international picture of an emerging culture. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3). Retrieved November 11, 2006 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-00/3-00corti-e.htm
10. Corti, L., & Thompson, P. (2004). Secondary analysis of archived data. In C. Scale (Ed.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 327-343). London: Sage Publications.
11. Corti, L., & Wright, M. (2003). MRC Population Data Archiving and Access Project Consultants' Report. Colchester: UK Data Archive, University of Essex.
12. Fielding, N. (2004). Qualitative Research and E-Social Science: Appraising the Potential. University of Surrey. Retrieved November 11, 2006 from http://www.ncess.ac.uk/docs/qualitative_research_and_e_soc_sci.pdf
13. Fraser, M., Shaukat, M., Timakov, S., Hindmarsh, J., Tutt, D., Heath, C, et al. (2006, July). Using real-time annotations as qualitative e-research metadata. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester, UK.
14. Fry, J. (2006). Coordination and control across scientific fields: Implications for a differentiated e-science. In C. Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science (167-188). Hershey, PA: IDEA Group.
15. Glaser, B. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues 6- Discussion. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
17. Groth, P. (2005, September). PReServ: Provenance recording for services. Paper presented at the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, UK.
18. Hagstrom, W. (1974). Competition in science. American Sociological Review, 39(1), 1-18.
19. Herle, A. (1994). Museums and shamans: A cross-cultural collaboration. Anthropology Today, 10(1), 2-5.
20. Hey, A., & Trefethen, A. (2003). The data deluge: An e-science perspective. In F. Berman, G. C. Fox, & A. Hey (Eds.), Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality (pp. 809-824). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
21. Hine, C. (2005, July). Material culture and the shaping of e-science. Paper presented at the First International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester, UK.
22. Jirotka, M., Proctor, R., Hartswood, M., Slack, R., Simpson, A., Coopmans, C., et al. 2005). Collaboration and trust in healthcare innovation: The eDiaMoND case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14(4), 368-398.
23. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences in the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1306-1320.
24. Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25. Missier, P., Embury, S., Greenwood, M., Preece, A., & Binling, J. (2005, September). An ontology-based approach to handling information quality in e-science. Paper presented at the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, UK.
26. Purdam, K., Elliot, M., Smith, D., & Pickles, S. (2005, September). Confidential data access, disclosure risk and Grid computing. Paper presented at the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, UK.
27. Stokes, S. (2003). Art & Copyright. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
28. Strathern, M. (2005a, February). Currencies of collaboration. Paper presented at the PLACEB-O Workshop, Girton College, Cambridge, UK.
29. Strathern, M. (2005b, March). Useful knowledge. Lecture presented at The Isaiah Berlin Lecture, Manchester, UK.
30. Thompson, P. (2003). Towards ethical practice in the use of archived transcripted interviews: A response. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(4), 357-360.
31. van den Berg, H. (2005). Reanalyzing qualitative interviews from different angles: The risk of decontextualization and other problems of sharing qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1). Retrieved November 11, 2006 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-00/3-00corti-e.htm
32. Whitely, R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.