People post-stroke perceive movement fluency in virtual reality

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 218, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-8

  Van Dokkum, Liesjet ^a   Mottet, Denis ^a   Bonnin Koang, Huei Yune ^b   Metrot, Julien ^a   Roby Brami, Agnès ^c   Hauret, Isabelle ^d   Laffont, Isabelle ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b NÎMES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF CLERMONT FERRAND   (France)

^e MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Kinematic cues; Perception of action; Stroke rehabilitation; Upper extremity; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION; STROKE; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; APRAXIAS; ARM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFARCTION, MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PARESIS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84855487977     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2995-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Auvray M, Hoellinger T, Hanneton S, Roby-Brami A (2011) Perceptual weight judgements when viewing one's own and others' movements under minimalist conditions of visual presentation. Perception 40:1081-1103
2. Azouvi P, Olivier S, de Montety G, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Tesio L (2003) Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Caterine Bergego scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:51-57 (Pubitemid 36084022)
3. Battelli L, Cavanagh P, Thornton IM (2003) Perception of biological motion in parietal patients. Neuropsychologia 41:1808-1816 (Pubitemid 37188423)
4. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe B, Krebs HI (2009) Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24(1):62-69
5. Brochard S, Robertson J, Medee B, Remy-Neris O (2010) What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation? Curr Opin Neurol 23(6):683-687
6. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grezes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P (2005) Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex 15(8):1243
7. Calvo-Merino B, Grèzes J, Glaser DE, Passingham RE, Haggard P (2006) Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr Biol 16(19):1905-1910 (Pubitemid 44486753)
8. Fiorio M, Cesari P, Bresciani MC, Tinazzi M (2010) Expertise with pathological actions modulates a viewers motor system. Neuroscience 167:691-699
9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189-198
10. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B (2001) The assessment of aphasia and related disorders, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
11. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD (2004) Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav 36(2):212-224
12. Hallett M (2001) Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res Rev 36(2-3):169-174
13. Hayes SJ, Hodges NJ, Huys R, Williams AM (2007) End-point focus manipulations to determine what information is used during observational learning. Acta Psychol (Amst) 126(2):120-137
14. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M (2007) Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 14(2):52-61 (Pubitemid 46651524)
15. Holden MK (2005) Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 8(3):187-211
16. Huang VS, Krakauer JW (2009) Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J NeuroEng Rehabil 6:5
17. Jacob P (2009) The tuning-fork model of human social cognition: a critique. Conscious Cogn 18(1):229-243
18. Latash ML, Anson JG (1996) What are "normal movements" in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci 19(01):55-68
19. McCrea PH, Eng JJ (2004) Consequences of increased neuromotor noise for reaching movements in persons with stroke. Exp Brain Res 162(1):70-77 (Pubitemid 40487120)
20. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, Eckhardt M, Yavuzer G, Stam HJ, Smits M, Ribbers GM, Bussman JB (2011) Motor recovery and reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25(3):223-233
21. Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, de Kort PLM, Jansen BPW, de Haan EHF (2007) Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis 23:408-416 (Pubitemid 46742330)
22. Platz T, Pinkowski C, Van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G (2005) Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 19(4):404
23. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27(1):169-192
24. Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M, Cattaneo L (2009) Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 5(1):24-34
25. Robertson JVG, Hoellinger T, Lindberg P, Bensmail D, Hanneton S, Roby-Bramy A (2009) Effect of auditory feedback differs according to side of hemiparesis: a comparative pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6(1):45
26. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22(18):8297-8304 (Pubitemid 35379135)
27. Saygin AP (2007) Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain 130(9):2452
28. Serino A, De Filippo L, Casavecchia C, Coccia M, Shiffrar M, Làvadas E (2010) Lesions to the motor system affect action perception. J Cogn Neurosci 22(3):413-426
29. Shadmehr R, Wise SP (2005) Computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing. A foundation for motor learning. MIT Press, Cambridge
30. Stefan K, Cohen LG, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Celnik P, Sawaki L, Ungerleider L, Classen J (2005) Formation of a motor memory by action observation. J Neurosci 25(41):9339-9346 (Pubitemid 41464746)
31. van der Lee JH, de Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM (2001) The intra and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper-extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:14-19 (Pubitemid 32057613)
32. Viviani P, Stucchi N (1992) Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(3):603-623