Perpetual momentum: directed and unconstrained?

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 127-139

  Scharpf, Fritz W ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Citizenship; ECJ; economic liberties; European law; individual rights

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855459807     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2012.632152     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alter, K. J. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Alter, K. J. 2009. "Jurist advocacy movements in Europe: the role of euro-law associations in European integration (1953-1975)". In The European Court's Political Power, Edited by: Alter, K. J. 63-91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bickel, A. M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch. The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
4. Blauberger, M. 2012. With Luxembourg in mind... the remaking of national policies in the face of ECJ jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1): 109-26.
5. Caporaso, J. A. and Tarrow, S. 2009. Polanyi in Brussels: supranational institutions and the transnational embedding of markets. International Organization, 63(4): 593-620.
6. Chalmers, D. 1997. Judicial preferences and the Community legal order. The Modern Law Review, 60(2): 164-99.
7. Chalmers, D. and Chaves, M. 2012. The reference points of EU judicial politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1): 25-42.
8. Cichowski, R. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Davies, G. 2012. Activism relocated: the self-restraint of the European Court of Justice in its national context. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1): 76-91.
10. Ehmke, H. 1961. Wirtschaft und Verfassung. Die Verfassungsrechtsprechung des Supreme Court zur Wirtschaftsregulierung, Karlsruhe: C.F. Müller.
11. Esser, J. 1964. Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
12. Gerken, L., Rieble, V., Roth, G. H., Stein, T. and Streinz, R. 2009., Mangold" als ausbrechender Rechtsakt, Munich: Sellier.
13. Herzog, R. and Gerken, L. 2008. Stoppt den Europäischen Gerichtshof. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8 September
14. Höpner, M. 2010. "Warum betreibt der Europäische Gerichtshof Rechtsfortbildung? Die Politisierungshypothese". In Working Paper 10/2, Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. available at http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp10-2.pdf (accessed 7 September 2011)
15. Höpner, M. and Schäfer, A. 2010. A new phase of European integration: organized capitalisms in post-Ricardian Europe. West European Politics, 33(2): 344-68.
16. Kelemen, R. D. 2011. Eurolegalism. The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Kelemen, R. D. 2012. The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1): 43-58.
18. Maduro, M.P. (1998) We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution, Oxford: Hart Publishers.
19. Malecki, M. 2012. Do ECJ judges all speak with the same voice? Evidence of divergent preferences from the judgments of chambers. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1): 59-75.
20. McCloskey, R. G. 1962. Economic due process and the Supreme Court: an exhumation and a reburial. The Supreme Court Review, 1962: 34-62.
21. Menéndez, A. J. 2009. European citizenship after Martinez Sala and Baumbast: has European law become more human and less social?. RECON Online Working Paper 2009/05,
22. Scharpf, F. W. 1966. Judicial review and the political question - a functional analysis. Yale Law Journal, 75(4): 517-98.
23. Scharpf, F. W. 2009. Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity. European Political Science Review, 1(2): 173-204.
24. Scharpf, F. W. 2010. The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a "Social Market Economy". Socio-Economic Review, 8(2): 211-50.
25. Scharpf, F. W. 2011. "The JDT model: context and extensions". In The EU's Decision Traps. Comparing Policies, Edited by: Falkner, G. 217-36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Schmidt, S. K. 2011. "Overcoming the joint-decision trap in single-market legislation: the interplay between judicial and legislative politics". In The EU's Decision Traps. Comparing Policies, Edited by: Falkner, G. 38-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Schmidt, S. K. 2012. Who cares about nationality? The path-dependent case law of the ECJ from goods to citizens. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1): 8-24.
28. Sindbjerg Martinsen, D. and Vrangbaek, K. 2008. The Europeanization of health care governance - implementing the market imperatives of Europe. Public Administration, 86(1): 169-84.
29. Somek, A. 2008a. Das europäische Sozialmodell: Diskriminierungsschutz und Wettbewerb. Juridikum, 2008(3): 118-25.
30. Somek, A. 2008b. Individualism: An Essay on the Authority of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Stone Sweet, A. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Stone Sweet, A. and Stranz, K. 2012. Rights adjudication and constitutional pluralism in Germany and Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1): 92-108.
33. Vauchez, A. 2007. "Embedded law. Political sociology of the European Community of law: elements of a renewed research agenda". In EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2007/23, Florence: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
34. Weiler, J. H.H. and Lockhart, N. J.S. 1995. "Taking rights seriously" seriously: the European Court of Justice and its fundamental rights jurisprudence. Common Market Law Review, 32(1): 51-94.
35. Wind, M., Sindbjerg Martinsen, D. and Pons Rotger, G. 2009. The uneven legal push for Europe: questioning variation when national courts go to Europe. European Union Politics, 10(1): 63-88.
36. Wollenschläger, F. 2011. A new fundamental freedom beyond market integration: Union citizenship and its dynamics for shifting the economic paradigm of European integration. European Law Journal, 17(1): 1-34.