The role of service users in problem formulation and technical aspects of social research

Social Work Education

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 305-312

  Fisher, Mike ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144438657     PISSN: 02615479     EISSN: 14701227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02615470220136885     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ABBERLEY, P., 1992. Counting us out: a discussion of the OPCS disability surveys, Disability. Handicap and Society, 7(2): 139–155.
2. BARNES, C., 1992. Qualitative research: valuable or irrelevant?. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2): 115–123.
3. BARNES, C., 1996. Disability and the myth of the independent researcher. Disability and Society, 11(1): 107–110.
4. BERESFORD, P., and WALLCROFT, J., 1997. “ Psychiatric system survivors and emancipatory research: issues, overlaps and differences ”. In Doing Disability Research, Edited by: BARNES, C., and MERCER, G., 67–87. Leeds: The Disability Press.
5. BOOTH, T., and BOOTH, W., 1996. Sounds of silence: narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability and Society, 11(1): 55–69.
6. DONABEDIAN, A., 1992. Quality assurance in health care: the consumers' role. Quality in Health Care, 1: 247–251.
7. EVANS, C., and FISHER, M., User controlled research and Empowerment. Paper presented at the Empowerment Practice in Social Work: Developing Richer Conceptual Foundations. Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto.
8. EVANS, C., and FISHER, M., 1999. “ Collaborative evaluation with service users: moving towards user-controlled research ”. In Evaluation and Social Work Practice, Edited by: SHAW, I., and LISHMAN, J., London: Sage.
9. FISHER, M., MARSH, P., and PHILLIPS, D., 1986. In and Out of Care, London: Batsford.
10. GLASER, B., 1987. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
11. JONES, L., and PULLEN, G., 1992. Cultural differences: deaf and hearing researchers working together, Disability. Handicap and Society, 7(2): 189–196.
12. KRITH, L., 1992. Who care wins? Women, caring and disability, Disability. Handicap and Society, 7(2): 167–175.
13. LAYDER, D., 1998. Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research, London: Sage.
14. MARSH, P., and FISHER, M., 1992. Good Intentions: Developing Partnership in Social Services, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
15. MORRIS, J., 1992. Personal and political: a feminist perspective on researching physical disability, Disability. Handicap and Society, 7(2): 157–166.
16. MORRIS, J., 1995. “ Easy targets: a disability rights perspective on the 'young carers' debate ”. In Young Carers: Something to Think About: Papers Presented at Four SSI Workshops May-July 1995, Edited by: INSPECTORATE, S. S., 38–62. London: Department of Health.
17. MULLENDER, A., and WARD, D., 1991. Self-Directed Groupwork: Users Take Action for Empowerment, London: Whiting and Birch.
18. OLIVER, M., 1987. Redefining disability: some issues for research, Research. Policy and Planning, 5: 9–13.
19. OLIVER, M., 1992. Changing the social relations of research production, Disability. Handicap and Society, 7(2): 101–114.
20. OLIVER, M., and BARNES, C., 1997. AU we are saying is give disabled researchers a chance. Disability and Society, 12(5): 811–813.
21. RAPP, C., SHERA, W., and KISTHARDT, W., 1993. Research strategies for consumer empowerment. Social Work, 38(6): 727–735.
22. REASON, P., 1994. “ Human inquiry as discipline and practice ”. In Participation in Human Enquiry, Edited by: REASON, P., 40–56. London: Sage.
23. SHAKESPEARE, T., 1996. Rules of engagement: doing disability research. Disability and Society, 11(1): 115–119.
24. STRAUSS, A., 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. TURNER, M., 1998. “ The subjectivity of outcomes ”. In Outcomes of Social Care: a question of quality?, Edited by: BALLOCH, S., 5–7. London: NISW.
26. WARD, L., 1997. “ Funding for change: translating emancipatory disability research from theory to practice ”. In Doing Disability Research, Edited by: BARNES, C., and MERCER, G., 32–48. Leeds: The Disability Press.
27. WHITMORE, E., 1994. “ To tell the truth: working with oppressed groups in participatory approaches to inquiry ”. In Participation in Human Inquiry, Edited by: REASON, P., 82–98. London: Sage.
28. WILTSHIRE AND SWINDON USERS NETWORK. 1996. I Am in Control: Research into User's Views of the Wiltshire Independent Living Fund, Devizes: WCCUIN.
29. ZARB, G., 1992. On the road to Damascus: first steps towards changing the relations of disability research production, Disability. Handicap and Society, 7(2): 125–139.