Apple Pie-Spinach Metaphor: Shall e-Democracy make Participatory Planning More Wholesome?

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 571-586

  Åström, Joachim ^a   Granberg, Mikael ^a   Khakee, Abdul ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MEDIA ROLE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

SWEDEN;

MALUS X DOMESTICA; SPINACIA OLERACEA;

EID: 84855419807     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2011.626723     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Albrechts, L. 2008. Setting the scene. Planning Theory & Practice, 9(3): 379-414.
2. Albrechts, L. and Denayer, W. 2001. "Communicative planning, emancipatory politics and postmodernism". In Handbook of Urban Studies, Edited by: Paddison, R. 369-384. London: SAGE Publications.
3. Albrechts, L. and Mandelbaum, S. J. 2005. The Network Society: A New Context for Planning?, London: Routledge.
4. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216-224.
5. Arnstein, S. R. 2006. A ladder of citizen participation Available at http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-paarticipation.html (accessed 12 September 2009)
6. Åström, J. 2004. Mot en digital demokrati? Teknik, politik och institutionell förändring, Örebro: Örebro University. Örebro Studies in Political Science 9
7. Åström, J. and Granberg, M. 2007. Urban planners wired for change? Understanding elite support for eparticipation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 4(2): 63-77.
8. Åström, J. and Sedelius, T. 2010. Representativ demokrati 2.0. En utvärdering av Malmöinitiativet och Malmöpanelen, Malmö: Malmö stad.
9. Baum, H. S. 2001. "Citizen participation". In International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, 1840-1846. New York: Elsevier.
10. Blaug, R. 2002. Engineering democracy. Political Studies, 50: 102-116.
11. Bohm, K. 1985. Med- och motborgare i stadsplaneringen. En historia om medborgardeltagandets villkor, Stockholm: Liber.
12. Brox, O. 1969. Centralbyråkraterna och glesbygden, Halmstad: Verdandi.
13. Carpentier, N. 2009. Participation is not enough: The conditions of possibility of mediated participatory practices. European Journal of Communication, 24: 407-420.
14. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age, Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
15. Castells, M. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, 2nd ed, Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Chadwick, A. 2009. Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1): 9-41.
17. Coleman, S. 2004. The Network-Empowered Citizen. How People Share Civic Knowledge Online, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
18. Connor, D. M. 1988. A new ladder of citizen participation. National Civic Review, 77(3): 249-257.
19. Dahl, R. 1961. Who Governs?, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Dahlberg, L. 2007. The Internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 3(1): 47-64.
21. Dahlgren, L. and Mårtensson, B. 1983. Sårbarhet och självtillit. Tankar om krisen och lokalsamhället, Oslo: NordREFO.
22. Danziger, J. N. and Kling, R. 1982. "Computers in the policy process". In Computer and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments, Edited by: Danziger, J. N., Dutton, W. H., Kling, R. and Kraemer, K. L. 82-95. New York: Columbia University Press.
23. Davidoff, P. 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4): 331-338.
24. Davis, M. 2005. Planet of Slums, London: Verso.
25. Denvall, V. 1994. För samhällets bästa. Socialtjänstens medverkan i samhällsplaneringen, Floda: Zenon.
26. Department of the Environment. 1969. People and Planning: Report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington report), London: HMSO.
27. Eckerberg, K. 2001. "Sweden: Problems and prospects at the leading edge of LA21 implementation". In Sustainable Communities in Europe, Edited by: Lafferty, W. M. 15-39. London: Earthscan.
28. Farrell, H. and Drezner, D. 2008. The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 134: 15-30.
29. Firmino, R. 2005. Planning the unplannable: How local authorities integrate urban and ICTs policy-making. Journal of Urban Technology, 12(2): 49-69.
30. Forester, J. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
31. Friedmann, J. 1973. Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning, Garden City: Doubleday and Anchor Books.
32. Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Friedmann, J. 1992. Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
34. Fung, A. 2006. Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(1): 66-75.
35. Garrett, G. 2006. Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2): 202-224.
36. Granberg, M. 2008. Local governance 'in Swedish'? Globalisation, local welfare government and beyond. LocalGovernment Studies, 34(3): 363-377.
37. Granberg, M. and Åström, J. 2010. "From citizen participation to interactive decision-making? A case study of urban renewal". In Normative Implications of New Forms of Participation for Democratic Policy Processes, Edited by: Amnå, E. 53-66. Berlin: Nomos Verlag.
38. Granberg, M. and Elander, I. 2007. Local governance and climate change: Reflections on the Swedish experience. Local Environment, 12(5): 537-548.
39. Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston: Beacon Press.
40. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London: Macmillan.
41. Healey, P. 2008. The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28: 277-292.
42. Healey, P. and Gilroy, R. 1990. Towards a people-sensitive planning. Planning Practice and Research, 5(2): 21-29.
43. Hoff, J. 2004. Members of parliaments' use of ICT in a comparative European perspective. Information Polity, 9: 5-16.
44. Hunter, F. 1953. Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
45. Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. G. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy, New York: Routledge.
46. Khakee, A. 2002. Assessing institutional capital building in Agenda 21 process in Göteborg. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(1): 53-68.
47. Khakee, A. 2007. From Olympic village to middle-class waterfront housing project: Ethics in Stockholm's development planning. Planning Practice and Research, 22(2): 235-251.
48. Khakee, A. and Barbanente, A. 2003. Negotiative land-use and deliberative environmental planning in Italy and Sweden. International Planning Studies, 8(3): 181-200.
49. Khakee, A., Elander, I. and Sunesson, S. 1995. Remakng the Welfare State: Swedish Urban Planning and Policy-making in the 1990s, Aldershot: Avebury.
50. Kraemer, K. L. and Dutton, W. H. 1982. "The automation of bias". In Computer and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments, Edited by: Danziger, J. N., Dutton, W. H., Kling, R. and Kraemer, K. L. 170-193. New York: Columbia University Press.
51. Norris, D. F., Fletcher, P. D. and Holden, S. H. 2001. IsYour Local Government PluggedIn? Highlights of the 2000 Electronic Government Survey, Baltimore County: University of Maryland.
52. Norris, P. 2005. Developments in Party Communications, Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
53. Rocha, E. M. 1997. A ladder of empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1): 31-44.
54. Rothstein, B. 2006. The Social Democratic State, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
55. Sandercock, L. 1998a. "The death of modernist planning: Radical praxis for a postmodern age". In Cities for Citizens, Edited by: Douglass, M. and Friedmann, J. 91-108. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
56. Sandercock, L. 1998b. Towards Cosmopolis, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
57. Sehested, K. Investigating Urban Governance-From the Perspective of Policy Networks, Democracy and Planning. Research Paper no. 1/01. Roskilde: Department of Social Sciences, Roskilde University.
58. Shane, P. 2008. Democratic Information Communities, Unpublished manuscript. Michael E. Moritz College of Law, Columbus, OH
59. Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Stone, C. N. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
61. Taylor, N. 1998. Urban Planning Theory since 1945, London: Sage Publications.
62. Torfing, J. and Sørensen, E. 2008. Enhancing effective and democratic governance through empowered participation: Some critical reflections. Planning Theory and Practice, 9(3): 394-400.
63. van Rij, E. Collaborative planning in practice. Collaborative planning, public private partnerships and spatial development planning for the metropolitan landscape. Paper presented at the ENHR International Conference on Sustainable Urban Areas. June 25-28, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Available at www.enhr2007rotterdam.nl (accessed 11 April 2010)
64. Wiedemann, P. M. and Fermer, B. 1993. Public participation in waste management decision making: Analysis and management of conflicts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 33: 355-368.