Urban planners, wired for change? Understanding elite support for E-participation

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 63-77

  Åström, Joachim ^a   Granberg, Mikael ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Democracy; E Participation; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950778069     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331680802076116     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Albrechts, L., & Denayer, W. (2001). Communicative planning, emancipatory politics and postmodernism. In R. Paddison (Ed.), Handbook of urban studies. London: SAGE Publications.
2. Alfredsson, B., & Wiman, J. (2001). Planning in Sweden- fundamentals outlined. In I. Christoferson (Ed.), Swedish planning-in times of diversity. Gävle, Sweden: The Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning.
3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
4. Åström, J. (2004). Mot en digital demokrati? Teknik, politik och institutionell förändring. Örebro Studies in Political Science 9. Örebro, Sweden: Örebro University.
5. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory democracy for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Birch, A. H. (2001). The concepts and theories of modern democracy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
7. Blaug, R. (2002). Engineering democracy. Political Studies, 50, 102-116.
8. Bohm, K. (1985). Med- och motborgare i stadsplanering: En historia om medborgardeltagandets förutsättningar. Stockholm: Liber.
9. Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10. Christoferson, J., & Öhman, I. (1998). Kommunal planering under 1990-talet: En studie av Sveriges kommuner. Uppsala, Sweden: Ascender.
11. Coglianese, C. (2004). Information technology and regulatory policy: New directions for digital government research. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 85-91.
12. Coleman, S. (1999). Can the new media invigorate democracy? Political Quarterly, 70(1), 16-22.
13. Damanpour, F. (1996). Bureaucracy and innovation revisited. Effects of contingency factors, industrial sectors, and innovation characteristics. Journal of High Technology and Management Research, 7(2), 149-173.
14. Danziger, J. N., & Kling, R. (1982). Computers in the policy process. In J. N. Danziger, W. H. Dutton, R. Kling, & K. L. Kraemer (Eds.), Computers and politics: High technology in American local governments. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. deLeon, P. (1992). The democratization of the policy sciences. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 125-129.
16. Denters, B., & Rose, L. (Eds.). (2005). Comparing local governance: Trends and developments. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Fog, H., Bröchner, J. Törnqvist, A., & Åström, K. (1989). Det kontrollerade byggandet. Stockholm: Carlssons.
19. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
20. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66-75.
22. Granath, K. (2006). Respektfull förnyelse: Om kunskap och öppenhet i stadsplaneringsprocessen. Göteborg, Sweden: Chalmers Tekniska Högskola.
23. Granberg, M. (2004). Från lokal välfärdsstat till stadspolitik: Politiska processer mellan demokrati och effektivitet. Örebro Studies in Political Science 11. Örebro, Sweden: Örebro University.
24. Grönlund, Å. (2001). Democracy in an IT-framed society. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 23-26.
25. Gustafsson, G. (1981). KPP-projektet om kommunal demokrati och planering. Stockholm: Statens råd för byggnadsforskning.
26. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
27. Healey, P., & Khakee, A. (1997). Making strategic spatial plans: Innovation in Europe. London: UCL Press.
28. Held, D. (1987). Models of democracy. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
29. Henecke, B., & Khan, J. (2002). Medborgardeltagande i den fysiska planeringen-En demokratiteoretisk analys av lagstiftning, retorik och praktik. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
30. Hoff, J. (2004). Members of parliaments' use of ICT in a comparative European perspective. Information Polity, 9, 5-16.
31. John, P. (2001). Local governance in Western Europe. London: SAGE Publications.
32. Kersting, N., & Vetter, A. (Eds.). (2003). Reforming local government in Europe: Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
33. Khakee, A. (1989). Kommunal planering i omvandling 1947-1987. Gerum No. 13. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University.
34. Khakee, A. (1999). Demokratin i samhällsplaneringen. In E. Amnå (Ed.), Medborgarnas erfarenheter. SOU 1999: 113. Stockholm: Fakta info direkt.
35. Khakee, A. (2000) Samhällsplanering. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
36. Klijn, E-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Politicians and interactive decision making: Institutional spoilsports or playmakers. Public Administration, 78(2), 365-387.
37. Kraemer, K. L., & Dutton, W. H. (1982). The Automation of Bias. In J. N. Danziger, W. H Dutton, R. Kling, & K. L. Kraemer (Eds.), Computers and politics: High technology in American local governments. New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Lenihan, D. G. (2002). E-government, federalism and democracy: The new governance. Ottawa, Canada: Centre for Collaborative Government.
39. Macintosh, A. (2003). Using information and communication technologies to enhance citizen engagement in the policy process. In Promises and problems of e-democracy: Challenge of online citizen engagement. Paris: OECD.
40. Mahrer, H., & Krimmer, R. (2005). Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of 'the middleman paradox.' Information Systems Journal, 15, 27-42.
41. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
42. McNeal, R. S., Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & Dotterweich, L. J. (2003). Innovating in digital government in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 52-70.
43. Nilsson, K. (2003). Planning in a sustainable direction- The art of conscious choices. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology.
44. Nordicom. (2006). Sveriges Internetbarometer 2005. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University.
45. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide? Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Norris, P. (2005). Developments in party communications. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
47. Norris, D. F., Fletcher, P. D., & Holden, S. H. (2001). Is your local government plugged in? Highlights of the 2000 electronic government survey. Baltimore County: University of Maryland.
48. Nyström, J. (2003). Planeringens grunder: En översikt Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
49. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
50. Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
51. Pratchett, L. (1998). Technological bias in the information age. ICT policy making in local government. In I. Snellen & W. Donk (Eds.), Public information in an information age. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
52. Pratchett, L., Wingfield, M., & Karakaya Polat, R. (2005, May 27). Barriers to e-democracy: Local government experiences and responses. Local e-Democracy National Project, England.
53. Sandercock, L. (1998a). The death of modernist planning: Radical praxis for a postmodern age. In M. Douglass, & J. Friedmann (Eds.), Cities for citizens. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
54. Sandercock, L. (1998b). Towards cosmopolis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
55. Schmidt, S. (1986). Pionjärer, efterföljare och avvaktare. Lund, Sweden: Kommunfakta Förlag.
56. Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.
57. Sehested, K. (2001). Investigating urban governance- From the perspective of policy networks, democracy and planning. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.
58. Shulman, S., Schlosberg, D., Zavestovski, S., & Courard-Hauri, D. (2003). Electronic rulemaking: A public participation research agenda for the social sciences. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 162-178.
59. Snellen, I. (2001). ICTs, bureaucracies, and the future of democracy. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 45-48.
60. SOU 2000: 1 (State Commission Report). En uthållig demokrati. Politik för folkstyrelse på 2000-talet Demokratiutredningens betänkande. Stockholm: Fritzes.
61. SOU 2001: 48 (State Commission Report). Att vara med på riktigt-Demokratiutveckling i kommuner och landsting. Bilagor till betänkande av kommundemokratikommittén. Stockholm: Fritzes.
62. Strömgren, A. (2007) Samordning, hyfs och reda. Stabilitet och förändring i svensk planpolitik 1945-2005. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
63. The Swedish National Post and Telecom Agency. (2002). IT-infrastrukturen i Sverige, 2002: Tillgänglighet i olika delar av landet. PTS-ER-2002: 20. Stockholm: Author.
64. Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2004). Collaborative public administration: Some lessons from the Israeli experience. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(6), 700-711.
65. Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Yang, K. (2005). Public administrators' trust in citizens: A missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 273-285.