Substantial postoperative pain is common among children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 130-135

  Tomecka, Maggie J ^a   Bortsov, Andrey V ^a   Miller, Natalie R ^a   Solano, Natalie ^a   Narron, John ^b   McNaull, Peggy P ^a   Ricketts, Karene J ^a   Lupa, Concetta M ^a   McLean, Samuel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

acute pain; adolescent age; child age; pain complications; pain postanesthesia care unit

Indexed keywords

DESFLURANE; FENTANYL; ISOFLURANE; KETOROLAC; MORPHINE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; OPIATE; PARACETAMOL; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM; SEVOFLURANE; SUXAMETHONIUM;

ADOLESCENT; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDIX PERFORATION; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; CHILD; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84855385403     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03711.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Schmelzer TM, Rana AR, Walters KC, et al. Improved outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy in the pediatric population. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17: 693-697. (Pubitemid 47535361)
2. Blakely ML, Spurbeck WW, Lobe TE,. Current status of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 1998; 7: 225-227. (Pubitemid 28531514)
3. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 910-925. (Pubitemid 20363670)
4. McLean SA, Diatchenko L, Lee YM, et al. Catechol o-methyltransferase haplotype predicts immediate musculoskeletal neck pain and psychological symptoms after motor vehicle collision. J Pain 2011; 12: 101-107.
5. Coghill RC, Eisenach J,. Individual differences in pain sensitivity: implications for treatment decisions. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 1312-1314. (Pubitemid 36622461)
6. Nielsen CS, Stubhaug A, Price DD, et al. Individual differences in pain sensitivity: genetic and environmental contributions. Pain 2008; 136: 21-29. (Pubitemid 351491364)
7. Mogil JS, Sternberg WF, Marek P, et al. The genetics of pain and pain inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 3048-3055. (Pubitemid 26114361)
8. Mogil JS,. The genetic mediation of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and its inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 7744-7751. (Pubitemid 29328352)
9. Campbell CM, Edwards RR, Fillingim RB,. Ethnic differences in responses to multiple experimental pain stimuli. Pain 2005; 113: 20-26. (Pubitemid 40038442)
10. Campbell CM, France CR, Robinson ME, et al. Ethnic differences in diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. J Pain 2008; 9: 759-766.
11. George SZ, Bialosky JE, Donald DA,. The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain: a preliminary investigation involving patients classified for specific exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 580-588. (Pubitemid 41318554)
12. Picavet HS, Vlaeyen JW, Schouten JS,. Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia: predictors of chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156: 1028-1034. (Pubitemid 35396932)
13. von Baeyer CL, Spagrud LJ, McCormick JC, et al. Three new datasets supporting use of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) for children's self-reports of pain intensity. Pain 2009; 143: 223-227.
14. Miro J, Castarlenas E, Huguet A,. Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain. Eur J Pain 2009; 13: 1089-1095.
15. von Baeyer CL,. Numerical rating scale for self-report of pain intensity in children and adolescents: recent progress and further questions. Eur J Pain 2009; 13: 1005-1007.
16. Worster A, Haines T,. Advanced statistics: understanding medical record review (MRR) studies. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11: 187-192. (Pubitemid 38166973)
17. McConahay T, Bryson M, Bulloch B,. Defining mild, moderate, and severe pain by using the color analogue scale with children presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13: 341-344.
18. Hadden SM, Burke CN, Skotcher S, et al. Early postoperative outcomes in children after adenotonsillectomy. J Perianesth Nurs 2011; 26: 89-95.
19. Jensen MP, Smith DG, Ehde DM, et al. Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain 2001; 91: 317-322. (Pubitemid 32241153)
20. Hawthorn J, Redmond K,. Pain: Causes and Management. Osney Mead, Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 1998.
21. Woodcock J,. The prospects for "personalized medicine" in drug development and drug therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007; 81: 164-169. (Pubitemid 46174812)
22. Abrahams E, Ginsburg GS, Silver M,. The Personalized Medicine Coalition: goals and strategies. Am J Pharmacogenomics 2005; 5: 345-355. (Pubitemid 41783781)
23. Abrahams E, Silver M,. The case for personalized medicine. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009; 3: 680-684.
24. Schechter NL, Allen DA, Hanson K,. Status of pediatric pain control: a comparison of hospital analgesic usage in children and adults. Pediatrics 1986; 77: 11-15. (Pubitemid 16176891)
25. Acute pain management in infants, children, and adolescents: operative and medical procedures. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin 1992; 92: 1-22.