An application of a dual-process approach to decision making in social dilemmas

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 124, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 203-212

  Liu, Chang Jiang ^a   Hao, Fang ^b  

^a SHENYANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHENYANG INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855374433     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.2.0203     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allison, S.T., &Messick, D.M.(1990).Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 23-42.
2. Brewer, M.B., &Kramer, R.M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Efects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
3. Camerer, C., &Thaler, R.H. (1995). Anomalies, ultimatums, dictatorsandmanners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209-219.
4. Carmon, Z., &Ariely,D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
5. Chaiken, S.L., &Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. NewYork, NY: Guilford.
6. Diekmann, K.A., Samuels, S.M., Ross, L., &Bazerman, M.H. (1997). Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1061-1074.
7. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
8. Evans, J. St.B.T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
9. Fehr, E., &Rockenbach, B. (2004). Human altruism: Economic, neural, and evolutionary perspectives. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 784-790.
10. Godek, J., &Murray, K.B. (2008). Willingnes stopay for advice: The role of rational and experiential processing. 10: 42 AM Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 77-87.
11. Hauert, C. (2006). Spatial efectsinsocialdilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 240, 627-636.
12. Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1979). Prospecttheory: Ananalysis of decisionunderrisk. Econometrica, 47,263-291.
13. Kollock, P. (1998). Socialdilemmas: Theanatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183-214.
14. Komorita, S.S., &Parks, C.D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46,183-207.
15. Kopelman, S., Weber, J.M., &Messick, D.M. (2002). Factorsinluencing cooperationincommonsdilemmas: Areview of experimental psychologicalresearch. InE. Ostrom, T.Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, &E.U. Weber (Eds.), Thedrama of thecommons (pp.113-156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Liu, C.-J., &Li,S. (2009). Contextualizedself: Whentheselfrunsintosocialdilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 44, 451-458.
17. Mc Elroy, T., &Seta, J.J. (2003). Framing effects: Ananalytic-holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 610-617.
18. Messick, D.M., &Brewer, M.B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In L.Wheeler &P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol.IV,pp.11-44). Thous and Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Pillutla, M., Farh, J.-L., Lee, C., &Lin, Z. (2007). An investigation of traditionality as a moderator of reward allocation. Group & Organization Management, 32, 233-253.
20. Roch, S.G., Lane, J.A.S., Samuelson, C.D., Allison, S.T., & Dent, J.L. (2000). Cognitive load and the equality heuristic: A two-stage model of resource overconsumption in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 185-212.
21. Schul, Y., & Mayo,R. (2003). Searching for certainty in an uncertain world: The difficulty of giving up the experiential for the rationalmode of thinking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16,93-106.
22. Sell, J., Chen. Z.-Y., Hunter-Holmes, P., &Johansson, A.C. (2002). Across-cultural comparison of public good and resource good settings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 285-297.
23. Sell, J., &Son, Y. (1997). Comparing public goods with common pool resources: Three experiments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 118-137.
24. Simon, L., Green berg, J.,Harmon-Jones, E., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., & Abend, T. (1997). Terror management and cognitive-experiential self-theory: Evidence that terror management occurs in the experiential system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1132-1146.
25. Smith, E.R., & De Coster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4,108-131.
26. Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., &Van Dijk, E. (2006). Violating equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive reactions as a function of trust, attribution, and honesty. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 32, 894-906.
27. Tazelaar, M.J.A., Van Lange, P.A.M., & Ouwerkerk,J.W. (2004). How to cope with "noise" social dilemmas: Thebeneits of communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87,845-859.
28. Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1995). Coordinate rules in a symmetric social dilemmas: A comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 1-27.
29. Van Lange, P.A.M., & Kuhlman, D.M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
30. Weber, J.M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D.M. (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281-307
31. Yuki, M. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 166-183