The impact of cellular debris on pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence to silicone hydrogel contact lenses and contact lens storage cases

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-15

  Burnham, Geoffrey W ^a   Cavanagh, H Dwight ^a   Robertson, Danielle M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact lens; Contact lens storage cases; Infection; Inflammation; Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BIOFILM; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA; CULTURE MEDIUM; HYDROGEL; INFLAMMATION; KERATITIS; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SILICONE HYDROGEL CONTACT LENS; STORAGE;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; CELL SURVIVAL; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EPITHELIAL CELLS; EQUIPMENT CONTAMINATION; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; NEUTROPHILS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SILICONES;

EID: 84855341007     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: 1542233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31823bad0e     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, et al. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. A case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1989; 321:773-778. (Pubitemid 19237423)
2. Pachigolla G, Blomquist P, Cavanagh HD. Microbial keratitis pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities: A 5-year review of cases at an urban county hospital in North Texas. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:45-49. (Pubitemid 46114828)
3. Ormerod LD, Smith RE. Contact lens-associated microbial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:79-83. (Pubitemid 16172233)
4. Mondino BJ, Weissman BA, Farb MD, et al. Corneal ulcers associated with daily-wear and extended-wear contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;102:58-65. (Pubitemid 16066064)
5. Willcox MD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and inflammation during contact lens wear: A review. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:273-278. (Pubitemid 46624851)
6. Imayasu M, Petroll WM, Jester JV, et al. The relation between contact lens oxygen transmissibility and binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cornea after overnight wear. Ophthalmology 1994;101:371-388. (Pubitemid 24077040)
7. Cavanagh HD, Ladage PM, Li SL, et al. Effects of daily and overnight wear of a novel hyper oxygen-transmissible soft contact lens on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1957-1969. (Pubitemid 35222545)
8. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Ren DH, et al. Effects of rigid and soft contact lens daily wear on corneal epithelium, tear lactate dehydrogenase, and bacterial binding to exfoliated epithelial cells. Ophthalmology 2001;108: 1279-1288 (Pubitemid 32568140)
9. Ren DH, PetrollWM, Jester JV, et al. Adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to shed rabbit corneal epithelial cells after overnight wear of contact lenses. CLAO J 1997;23:63-68. (Pubitemid 27043770)
10. Ren DH, Petroll WM, Jester JV, et al. The Relationship between contact lens oxygen permeability and binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human corneal epithelial cells after overnight and extended Wear. CLAO J 1999;25: 80-100. (Pubitemid 29200889)
11. Ren DH, Yamamoto K, Ladage PM, et al. Adaptive effects of 30-night wear of hyper-O2 transmissible contact lenses on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium. Ophthalmology 2002;109:27-39. (Pubitemid 34027419)
12. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Li L, et al. Corneal epithelial homeostasis following daily and overnight lens wear. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2002;25: 11-21. (Pubitemid 34414013)
13. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, et al. The incidence of contact lens related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1655-1662.
14. Szczotka-Flynn L, Diaz M. Risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: A meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:247-256. (Pubitemid 46624849)
15. Szczotka-Flynn L, Lass JH, Sethi A, et al. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events during continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:5421-5430.
16. Zegans ME, Becker HI, Budzik J, et al. The role of bacterial biofilms in ocular infections. DNA Cell Biol 2002;21:415-420. (Pubitemid 35034584)
17. Szliter EA, Barrett RP, Gabriel MM, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced inflammation in the rat extended-wear contact lens model. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:12-18. (Pubitemid 43189088)
18. Tam C, Mun JJ, Evans DJ, et al. The impact of inoculation parameters on the pathogenesis of contact lens-related infectious keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:3100-3106.
19. McLaughlin-Borlace L, Stapleton F, Matheson M, et al. Bacterial biofilm on contact lenses and lens storage cases in wearers with microbial keratitis. J Appl Microbiol 1998;84:827-838. (Pubitemid 28294476)
20. Stapleton F, Dart J. Pseudomonas keratitis associated with biofilm formation on a disposable soft contact lens. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:864-865.
21. Robertson DM, Parks QM, Young RL, et al. Disruption of contact lensassociated Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms formed in the presence of neutrophils. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:2844-2850.
22. Walker TS, Tomlin KL, Worthen GS, et al. Enhanced Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development mediated by human neutrophils. Infect Immun 2005;73:3693-3701. (Pubitemid 40745914)
23. Parks QM, Young RL, Poch KR, et al. Neutrophil enhancement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development: Human F-actin and DNA as targets for therapy. J Med Microbiol 2009;58:492-502.
24. Willcox M, Power KN, Stapleton F, et al. Potential sources of bacteria that are isolated from contact lenses during wear. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:1030-1038. (Pubitemid 28051489)
25. Hall BJ, Jones L. Contact lens cases: the missing link in contact lens safety? Eye Contact Lens 2010;36:101-105.
26. Vermeltfoort PB, Hooymans JM, Busscher HJ, et al. Bacterial transmission from lens storage cases to contact lenses-effects of lens care solutions and silver impregnation of cases. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87: 237-243.
27. Szczotka-Flynn LB, Pearlman E, Ghannoum M. Microbial contamination of contact lenses, lens care solutions, and their accessories: A literature review. Eye Contact Lens 2010;36:116-129.
28. Devonshire P, Munro FA, Abernety C, et al. Microbial contamination of contact lens cases in the west of Scotland. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77: 41-45. (Pubitemid 23031814)
29. Larkin DF, Kilvington S, Easty DL. Contamination of contact lens storage cases by Acanthamoeba and bacteria. Br J Ophthalmol 1990;74: 133-135. (Pubitemid 20106082)
30. Willcox MDP, Carnt NA, Diec J, et al. Contact lens case contamination during daily wear of silicone hydrogels. Optom Vis Sci 2010;87:456-464.
31. Wu YT, Zhu H, Harmis NY, et al. Profile and frequency of microbial contamination of contact lens cases. Optom Vis Sci [published online ahead of print January 22, 2010] doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181cf86ee
32. Gray TB, Cursons RT, Sherwan JF, et al. Acanthamoeba, bacterial, and fungal contamination of contact lens storage cases. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:601-605.
33. Wu YT, Zhu H, Willcox M, et al. Removal of biofilm from contact lens storage cases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6329-6333.
34. Wu YT, Zhu H, Willcox M, et al. The effectiveness of various cleaning regimens and current guidelines in contact lens case biofilm removal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:5287-5292.
35. Haslett C, Guthrie LA, Kopaniak MM, et al. Modulation of neutrophil function by preparative methods or trace concentrations of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Am J Pathol 1985;119:101-110. (Pubitemid 15088729)
36. Robertson DM, Li L, Fisher S, et al. Characterization of growth and differentiation in a telomerase-immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:470-478. (Pubitemid 40270324)
37. Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, et al. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 2002;295:1487. (Pubitemid 34173996)
38. Allesen-Holm M, Barken KB, Yang L, et al. A characterization of DNArelease in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol Microbiol 2006;59:1114-1128.
39. Fuxman Bass JI, Russo DM, Gabelloni ML, et al. Extracellular DNA: A major proinflammatory component of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J Immunol 2010;184:6386-6395.
40. Lee S, Bowrin K, Hamad AR, et al. Extracellular matrix lumican deposited on the surface of neutrophils promotes migration by binding b2 integrin. J Biol Chem 2009;284:23662-23669.
41. Hofman P. Molecular regulation of neutrophil apoptosis and potential targets for therapeutic strategy against the inflammatory process. Inflamm Allergy 2004;3:1-9. (Pubitemid 38854885)
42. Geering B, Simon H-U. Peculiarities of cell death mechanisms in neutrophils. Cell Death Differ 2011;18:1457-1469.
43. Feldman MA, Meloan CE, Lamber JL. A new method for recovering latent fingerprints from skin. J Forensic Sci 1982;27:806-811. (Pubitemid 12003762)
44. Zamir A, Springer E, Glattstein B. Fingerprints and Dna: STR typing of DNAextracted from adhesive tape after processing for fingerprints. J Forensic Sci 2000;45:687-688. (Pubitemid 30308053)
45. Szczotka-Flynn LB, Imamura Y, Chandra J, et al. Increased resistance ofcontact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions. Cornea 2009;28:918-926.
46. Wilson LA, Sawant AD, Ahearn DG. Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in lens cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1155-1157.