Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions

Cornea

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 918-926

  Szczotka Flynn, Loretta B ^a   Imamura, Yoshifumi ^a   Chandra, Jyotsna ^a   Yu, Changping ^a,b   Mukherjee, Pranab K ^a   Pearlman, Eric ^a   Ghannoum, Mahmoud A ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Shandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology   (China)

Author keywords

Bacterial biofilm; Contact lens care solutions; Silicone hydrogel contact lens

Indexed keywords

AQUIFY; BIGUANIDE; CLEAR CARE; COMPLETE MOISTUREPLUS; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; OPTI FREE REPLENISH; RENU MULTIPLUS; SILICONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM COLONY; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BIOFILM; CELL STRUCTURE; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DISINFECTION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HYDROGEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SERRATIA MARCESCENS; SOFT CONTACT LENS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BIOFILMS; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; HYDROGELS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PLANKTON; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SERRATIA MARCESCENS; SILICONES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 69749112208     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a81835     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Woods CA, Jones DA, Jones LW, et al. A seven year survey of the contact lens prescribing habits of Canadian optometrists. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:505-510.
2. Mack C. Contact lenses 2007. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2008;23:26-34.
3. Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, et al. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:779-783. (Pubitemid 19237424)
4. Schein OD, McNally JJ, Katz J, et al. The incidence of microbial keratitis among wearers of a 30-day silicone hydrogel extended-wear contact lens. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:2172-2179. (Pubitemid 41720997)
5. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, et al. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1655-1662.
6. Szczotka-Flynn L, Diaz-Insua M. Risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low Dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;125:1-5. (Pubitemid 46624849)
7. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:167-193.
8. Elder MJ, Stapleton F, Evans E, et al. Biofilm-related infections in ophthalmology. Eye. 1995;9:102-109.
9. Khardori N, Yassien M. Biofilms in device-related infections. J Ind Microbiol. 1995;15:141-147.
10. McLaughlin-Borlace L, Stapleton F, Matheson M, et al. Bacterial biofilm on contact lenses and lens storage cases in wearers with microbial keratitis. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84:827-838. (Pubitemid 28294476)
11. Stapleton F, Dart J. Pseudomonas keratitis associated with biofilm formation on a disposable soft contact lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:864-865.
12. Zegans ME, Shanks RM, O'Toole GA. Bacterial biofilms and ocular infections. Ocul Surf. 2005;3:73-80.
13. Zegans ME, Becker HI, Budzik J, et al. The role of bacterial biofilms in ocular infections. DNA Cell Biol. 2002;21:415-420. (Pubitemid 35034584)
14. Lattif AA, Chandra J, Chang J, et al. Proteomic and pathway analyses reveal phase-dependent over-expression of proteins associated with carbohydrate metabolic pathways in Candida albicans biofilms. Open Proteomics J. 2008;1:5-26.
15. O'Toole GA, Pratt LA, Watnick PI, et al. Genetic approaches to study of biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 1999;310:91-109.
16. Yeater KM, Chandra J, Cheng G, et al. Temporal analysis of Candida albicans gene expression during biofilm development. Microbiology. 2007;153:2373-2385. (Pubitemid 47262027)
17. Garcia-Sanchez S, Aubert S, Iraqui I, et al. Candida albicans biofilms: a developmental state associated with specific and stable gene expression patterns. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3:536-545. (Pubitemid 38497991)
18. Beenken KE, Dunman PM, McAleese F, et al. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4665-4684. (Pubitemid 38891030)
19. Schembri MA, Kjaergaard K, Klemm P. Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:253-267. (Pubitemid 36411481)
20. Vermeltfoort PB, Hooymans JM, Busscher HJ, et al. Bacterial transmission from lens storage cases to contact lenses-effects of lens care solutions and silver impregnation of cases. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;87:234-243.
21. Wilson LA, Sawant AD, Ahearn DG. Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in lens cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1155-1157.
22. Evans DJ, Allison DG, Brown MR, et al. Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli biofilms towards ciprofloxacin: effect of specific growth rate. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991;27:177-184.
23. Imamura Y, Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, et al. Fusarium and Candida albicans biofilms on soft contact lenses: model development, influence of lens type and susceptibility to lens care solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:171-182.
24. Alfonso E, Mandelbaum S, Fox MJ, et al. Ulcerative keratitis associated with contact lens wear. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:429-433. (Pubitemid 16111091)
25. Donnenfeld ED, Cohen EJ, Arentsen JJ, et al. Changing trends in contact lens associated corneal ulcers: an overview of 116 cases. CLAO J. 1986;12:145-149.
26. Hume EB, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. Evasion of cellular ocular defenses by contact lens isolates of Serratia marcescens. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:108-112. (Pubitemid 43189079)
27. Hume EB, Willcox MD. Emergence of Serratia marcescens as an ocular surface pathogen. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2004;79:475-477.
28. Hume EB, Zhu H, Cole N, et al. Efficacy of contact lens multipurpose solutions against Serratia marcescens. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:316-320. (Pubitemid 46624857)
29. Jalbert I, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from a contact lens at the time of a contact lens-induced peripheral ulcer: case report. Cornea. 2000;19:116-120. (Pubitemid 30007757)
30. Willcox MD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and inflammation during contact lens wear: a review. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:273-278. (Pubitemid 46624851)
31. Wu PZ, Thakur A, Stapleton F, et al. Staphylococcus aureus causes acute inflammatory episodes in the cornea during contact lens wear. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000;28:194-196. (Pubitemid 30686066)
32. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Premarket Notification [510(k)] Guidance Document for Contact Lens Care Products. Washington, DC: Center for Devices and Radiological Health; 1997.
33. Chang DC, Grant GB, O'Donnell K, et al. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. JAMA. 2006;296:953-963. (Pubitemid 44285372)
34. Joslin CE, Tu EY, Shoff ME, et al. The association of contact lens solution use and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:169-180.
35. Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, et al. Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans - development, architecture and drug resistance. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:5385-5394. (Pubitemid 32802612)
36. Chandra J, McCormick TS, Imamura Y, et al. Interaction of Candida albicans with adherent human peripheral blood mononuclear cells increases C. albicans biofilm formation and results in differential expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Infect Immun. 2007;75:2612-2620. (Pubitemid 46744353)
37. Andrews CS, Denyer SP, Hall B, et al. A comparison of the use of an ATP-based bioluminescent assay and image analysis for the assessment of bacterial adhesion to standard HEMA and biomimetic soft contact lenses. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3225-3233. (Pubitemid 32923329)
38. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3217-3224.
39. Garcia-Saenz MC, Arias-Puente A, Fresnadillo-Martinez MJ, et al. Adherence of two strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to contact lenses. Cornea. 2002;21:511-515. (Pubitemid 34663500)
40. Henriques M, Sousa C, Lira M, et al. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:446-450. (Pubitemid 40911481)
41. Kodjikian L, Casoli-Bergeron E, Malet F, et al. Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;246:267-273.
42. Schultz CL, Pezzutti MR, Silor D, et al. Bacterial adhesion measurements on soft contact lenses using a modified vortex device and a modified Robbins device. J Ind Microbiol. 1995;15:243-247.
43. Stapleton F, Dart J, Matheson M, et al. Bacterial adherence and glycocalyx formation on unworn hydrogel lenses J Brit Contact Lens Assoc. 1993;16:113-117.
44. Willcox MD, Harmis N, Cowell, et al. Bacterial interactions with contact lenses: effects of lens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3235-3247.
45. Holden BA, La Hood D, Grant T, et al. Gram-negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses. CLAO J. 1996;22:47-52. (Pubitemid 26039087)
46. Sankaridurg PR, Willcox MD, Sharma S, et al. Haemophilus influenzae adherent to contact lenses associated with production of acute ocular inflammation. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2426-2431. (Pubitemid 26307785)
47. Sankaridurg PR, Vuppala N, Sreedharan A, et al. Gram negative bacteria and contact lens induced acute red eye. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1996;44:29-32. (Pubitemid 126516456)
48. Sankaridurg PR, Sharma S, Willcox M, et al. Colonization of hydrogel lenses with Streptococcus pneumoniae: risk of development of corneal infiltrates. Cornea. 1999;18:289-295. (Pubitemid 29205553)
49. Selan L, Palma S, Scoarughi GL, et al. Phosphorylcholine impairs susceptibility to biofilm formation of hydrogel contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;147:134-139.
50. Baillif S, Casoli E, Marion K, et al. A novel in vitro model to study staphylococcal biofilm formation on intraocular lenses under hydrodynamic conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3410-3416. (Pubitemid 351639705)
51. Baillif S, Ecochard R, Casoli E, et al. Adherence and kinetics of biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis to different types of intraocular lenses under dynamic flow conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:153-158.
52. Slusher MM, Myrvik QN, Lewis JC, et al. Extended-wear lenses, biofilm, and bacterial adhesion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:110-115.
53. Farber BF, Hsieh HC, Donnenfeld ED, et al. A novel antibiofilm technology for contact lens solutions. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:831-836.
54. Codling CE, Maillard JY, Russell AD. Aspects of the antimicrobial mechanisms of action of a polyquaternium and an amidoamine. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:1153-1158.
55. Codling CE, Hann AC, Maillard JY, et al. An investigation into the antimicrobial mechanisms of action of two contact lens biocides using electron microscopy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2005;28:163-168.
56. May LL, Gabriel MM, Simmons RB, et al. Resistance of adhered bacteria to rigid gas permeable contact lens solutions. CLAO J. 1995;21:242-246.