Methodological quality and scientific impact of quantitative nursing education research over 18 months

Nursing Education Perspectives

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 362-368

  Yucha, Carolyn B ^a   Schneider, Barbara St Pierre ^a   Smyer, Tish ^a   Kowalski, Susan ^a   Stowers, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation rate; Impact factor; Methodological quality; Nursing education research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855267978     PISSN: 15365026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5480/1536-5026-32.6.362     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard.V., & Day, L (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Broome, M. E. (2009). Building the science for nursing education:Vision or improbable dream [Editorial]. Nursing Outlook, 57, 177-179. doi: 10.l0l6/j.outlook.2009.05.005
3. Cook, D. A., Beckman,T. J., & Bordage, G. (2007). A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: Many informative elements missing. Medical Education, 41, 1074-1081. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02861.x
4. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572. doi: I0.l073/pnas.0507655l02
5. Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Retrieved from http://iom.edu/Reports/201O/The-Future- ofNursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health.aspx.
6. Reed, D., Price, E. G.,Windish, D. M., Wright, S. M., Gozu.A., Hsu, E. B.,... Bass, E. B. (2005). Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142(12 II), 1080-1089.
7. Reed, D.A., Beckman.T.J., "Wright, S. M. (2009).An assessment of die méthodologie quality of medical education research studies published in American Journal of Surgery. American Journal of Surgery, 198, 442-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.0l.024
8. Reed, D.A., Beckman.T J., Wright, S. M., Levine, R. B., Kern, D. E., & Cook, D. A. (2008). Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: Quality of submissions to JGIM's medical education special issue. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 903-907. doi: 10.1007/s 11606-008-0664-3
9. Reed, D.A., Cook, D.A., Beckman.T. J., Levine, R. B., Kern, D. E., & Wright, S. M. (2007). Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 1002-1009. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1002 (Pubitemid 47360811)
10. Reed, D. A., Kern, D. E., Levine, R. B., & Wright, S. M. (2005). Costs and funding for published medical education research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2 94, 1052-1057. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.9.1052 (Pubitemid 41248446)
11. Stevens, K.A., & Cassidy.V. R. (1999). Evidence-based teaching: Current research In nursing education. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
12. Tanner, C. A., & Lindeman, C.A.-(1987). Research in nursing education: Assumptions and priorities. Journal of Nursing Education, 26, 50-59.
13. Yonge, O.J.,Anderson, M., Profetto-McGrath.J., Olson, J. K., Skillen, D. L, Boman, J.,...Day, R. ). An inventory of nursing education research. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 2, 1-11.doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1095