Strategic sampling for large choice sets in estimation and application

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 602-613

  Lemp, Jason D ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b  

^a Cambridge Systematics Inc ^*  (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Multinomial logit model; Strategic sampling scheme

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

EFFICIENCY BENEFITS; INDEPENDENCE OF IRRELEVANT ALTERNATIVES; INITIALIZATION STEP; MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; PROBABILITY ESTIMATE; SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING; STRATEGIC SAMPLING SCHEMES;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; MODEL TEST; PARAMETERIZATION; SAMPLING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRANSPORTATION; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

EID: 84855185985     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ben-Akiva M., Bowman J.L. Integration of an activity-based model system and a residential location model. Urban Studies 1998, 35(7):1131-1153.
2. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Ben-Akiva M., Watanatada T. Application of a continuous spatial choice logit model. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data and Econometric Applications 1981, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C.F. Manski, D. McFadden (Eds.).
4. Bhat C., Govindarajan A., Pulugurtha V. Disaggregate attraction end choice modeling: formulation and empirical analysis. Transportation Research Record 1998, 1645:60-68.
5. Bierlaire M., Bolduc D., McFadden D. The estimation of generalized extreme value models from choice-based samples. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(4):381-394.
6. Frejinger E., Bierlaire M., Ben-Akiva M. Sampling of alternatives for route choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43:984-994.
7. Lemp J.D., McWethy L.B., Kockelman K.M. From aggregate methods to microsimulation: assessing benefits of microscopic activity-based models of travel demand. Transportation Research Record 2007, 1994:80-88.
8. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location 1978, 75-96. North-Holland, Amsterdam. A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickbars, J. Weibull (Eds.).
9. McFadden D., Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2000, 15(5):447-470.
10. Nerella S., Bhat C.R. Numerical analysis of effect of sampling of alternatives in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1894:11-19.
11. Pozsgay M.A., Bhat C.R. Destination choice modeling for home-based recreational trips: analysis and implications for land use, transportation, and air quality planning. Transportation Research Record 2001, 1777:47-54.
12. Sermons M.W., Koppelman F.S. Representing differences between female and male commute behavior in residential location choice models. Journal of Transport Geography 2001, 9(2):101-110.
13. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. second ed.
14. Vovsha P. Application of cross-nested logit model to mode choice in tel aviv, Israel, metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record 1997, 1607:6-15.
15. Wen C.H., Koppelman F.S. The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35:627-641.
16. Williams H.C.W.L. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A 1977, 9:285-344.