Disaggregate attraction-end choice modeling formulation and empirical analysis

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1645, 1998, Pages 60-68

  Bhat, Chandra ^a   Govindarajan, Ajay ^b   Pulugurta, Vamsi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c KPMG LLP   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0342329161     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1645-08     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Guensler, R. Critical Research Needs in Land Use, Transportation and Air Quality. Transportation Research Circular, Vol. 389, No. 1, 1993.
2. Domencich, T. A., and D. McFadden. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1975.
3. Models of Mode and Occupancy Choice in the Shirley Highway Corridor. COMSIS Corp., Silver Spring, Md., 1988.
4. Chang, Y. B., and M. Plager. Interim Regional Travel Demand Forecasting Model: Development of the 1993 Version. Memorandum, Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, 1994.
5. McClennen, J., K. Quackenbush, and J. Gallagher. Chronology of FYA Transfer Penalties Research, Memorandum, Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, 1994.
6. Jones, P. M. Destination Choice and Travel Attributes, Determinants of Travel Choice (D. A. Hensher and Q. Dalvi, eds.). Saxon House, England, 1978.
7. McFadden, D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location: Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (A. Karlquist, L. Lundquist, F. Snickbars, and J. W. Weibull, eds.). North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 75-96.
8. Ben-Akiva, M., G. H. Gunn, and L. Silman. Disaggregate Trip Distribution Models. Proc., Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 1984.
9. Daly, A. Estimating Choice Models Containing Attraction Variables. Transportation Research, Vol. 16B, 1982, pp. 5-15.
10. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
11. Govindarajan, A. H. Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling Home-Based Work and Home-Based Shopping Trips. September, 1998.
12. Fotheringham, A. S. (1986). Modeling Hierarchical Destination Choice. Environment and Planning, Vol. 18A, pp. 401-418.
13. Department of Employment and Training. Employment Review. State of Massachusetts, 1992.
14. Crime in Massachusetts. Massachusetts State Police Crime Reporting Unit, 1992.
15. Fotheringham, A. S. Some Theoretical Aspects of Destination Choice and their Relevance To Production-Constrained Gravity Models. Environment and Planning, Vol. 15A, 1983, pp. 1121-1132.
16. Lo, L. Substitutability, spatial structure, and spatial interaction. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 21, 1991, pp. 132-146.
17. Borgers, A., and H. Timmermans (1987). A Context-Sensitive Model of Spatial Choice Behavior. Behavioral Modeling in Geography and Planning (R. Golledge and H. Timmermans, eds.). Croom Helm, London, 1987.
18. Dubin, R. Commuting Patterns and Firm Decentralization. Land Economics, Vol. 67, 1991, pp. 15-29.
19. Hodge, D. C. Geography and the Political Economy of Urban Transportation. Urban Geography, Vol. 11, 1990, pp. 87-100.
20. Madden, F. J. Why women work closer to home. Urban Studies, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 181-194.
21. Blumen, O. Gender Differences in the Journey to Work. Urban Geography, Vol. 15, 1994, pp. 223-245.
22. Hansen, S., and G. Pratt. Geographic Perspective on the Occupational Segregation of Women. National Geographic Research, Vol. 6, 1990, pp. 376-378.
23. Bhat, C. Travel Demand Modeling Improvements: Disaggregate Destination Choice Modeling. Massachusetts Highway Department, 1995.
24. Windmeijer, F. A. G. Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Binary Choice Models. Econometric Reviews, Vol. 14, 1995, pp. 101-116.