Semantic combinatorial processing of non-anomalous expressions

NeuroImage

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 3488-3501

  Molinaro, Nicola ^a   Carreiras, Manuel ^a,b,c   Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ^a  

^a BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^b BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

ERPs; Late positive component; N400; Naturality ratings; Semantic composition

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC COMBINATORIAL PROCESSING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855181995     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Badre D., Wagner A.D. Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the control of memory. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2883-2901.
2. Bemis D.K., Pylkkänen L. Simple composition: a magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:2801-2814.
3. Coulson S., Van Petten C. A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Res. 2007, 1146:128-145.
4. De Grauwe S., Swain A., Holcomb P.J., Ditman T., Kuperberg G.R. Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1965-1984.
5. Delong K.A., Urbach T.P., Groppe D.M., Kutas M. Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1203-1207.
6. Dikker S., Rabagliati H., Farmer T.A., Pylkkänen L. Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:629-634.
7. Federmeier K.D. Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:491-505.
8. Federmeier K.D., Kutas M. A rose by any other name: long-term memory structure and sentence processing. J. Mem. Lang. 1999, 41:469-495.
9. Federmeier K.D., Laszlo S. Time for meaning: electrophysiology provides insights into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. Adv. Res. Theory 2009, 51:1-44.
10. Federmeier K.D., Wlotko E.W., De Ochoa-Dewald E., Kutas M. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Res. 2007, 1146:75-84.
11. Frege, G., 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosopic und Philosophische Kritif 100. 25-50; trans. by M. Black as 'On sense and reference'. Translations from the Philosophic Writings of Gottlob Frege ed. by P. Geach and M. Black, 1960. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 56-78.
12. Grice P. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics 1975, 3. Academic Press, Speech Acts New York. P. Cole, J. Morgan (Eds.).
13. Hagoort P., Hald L., Bastiaansen M., Petersson K.M. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 2004, 304:438-441.
14. Hagoort P., Baggio G., Willems R.M. Semantic unification. The Cognitive Neurosciences 2009, 819-836. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
15. Halgren E., Dhond R.P., Christensen N., Van Petten C., Marinkovic K., Lewine J.D., et al. N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. NeuroImage 2002, 17:1101-1116.
16. Helenius P., Salmelin R., Service E., Connolly J.F. Distinct time courses of word and sentence comprehension in the left temporal cortex. Brain 1998, 121:1133-1142.
17. Kuperberg G.R. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. Brain Res. 2007, 1146:23-49.
18. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2011, 62:621-647.
19. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207:203-205.
20. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 1984, 307:161-163.
21. Kutas M., Delong K.A., Smith N.J. A look around at what lies ahead: prediction and predictability in language processing. Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future 2011, 190-207. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. Bar (Ed.).
22. Lau E., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:920-933.
23. Lucas M. Semantic priming without association: a meta-analytic review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2000, 7:618-630.
24. Lucas M. Essential and perceptual attributes of words in reflective and on-line processing. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2001, 30:605-625.
25. Molinaro N., Carreiras M. Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations. Biol. Psychol. 2010, 83:176-190.
26. Molinaro N., Conrad M., Barber H.A., Carreiras M. On the functional nature of the N400: contrasting effects related to visual word recognition and contextual semantic integration. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 1:1-7.
27. Pylkkänen L. Mismatching meanings in brain and behavior. Lang. Linguist. Compass 2008, 2:712-738.
28. Pylkkänen L., Marantz A. Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7:187-189.
29. Pylkkänen L., McElree B. An MEG study of silent meaning. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1905-1921.
30. Sebastian-Gallés N., Martí A., Carreiras M., Cuetos F. LEXESP: Una base de datos informatizada del español 2000, Ed. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
31. Smith E.E., Osherson D.N., Rips L.J., Keane M. Combining prototypes: a selective modification model. Cogn. Sci. 1988, 12:485-527.
32. Urbach T.P., Kutas M. Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation. J. Mem. Lang. 2010, 63:158-179.
33. Van Berkum J.J., Van den Brink D., Tesink C.M., Kos M., Hagoort P. The neural integration of speaker and message. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:580-591.
34. Van de Meerendonk N., Kolk H.H., Chwilla D.J., Vissers C.T. Monitoring in language perception. Lang. Linguist. Compass 2009, 3:1211-1224.
35. Van de Meerendonk N., Kolk H.H., Vissers C.T., Chwilla D.J. Monitoring in language perception: mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:67-82.