Process quality and incidence of acute complications in a series of more than 230000 outpatient colonoscopies

Endoscopy

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1018-1025

  Crispin, A ^a   Birkner, B ^b   Munte, A ^b   Nusko, G ^c   Mansmann, U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Bavarian Association of Compulsory Health Insurance Physicians   (Germany)

^c Klinik Bad Windsheim   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY COMPLICATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENDER; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCIDENCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTESTINAL BLEEDING; INTESTINE BIOPSY; INTESTINE PERFORATION; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LUNG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT CARE; POLYPECTOMY; PREMEDICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING; SEDATION; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADENOMA; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HEART DISEASES; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL PERFORATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESPIRATION DISORDERS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 71549164655     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215214     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lieberman D. Colonoscopy as a mass screening tool. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998 10 225-228
2. Lin O S., Kozarek R A., Schembre D B., et al. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy. JAMA 2006 295 2357-2365
3. Menges M, Gartner B, Georg T, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006 21 596-601 (Pubitemid 44111290)
4. OLeary B A., Olynyk J K., Neville A M., Platell C F. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: comparison of community-based flexible sigmoidoscopy with fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004 19 38-47
5. Levin T R., Zhao W, Conell C, et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 2006 145 880-886
6. Nelson D B., McQuaid K R., Bond J H., et al. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 55 307-314
7. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006 355 1863-1872
8. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S., Sauar J, Vatn M H. Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 52 606-610
9. Bronwicki J P., Venard V, Botte C, et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 1997 337 237-240
10. Draenert R, Goebel F D. Risk of viral infections in colonoscopy and endoscopic procedures [article in German]. Internist 2001 42 1690-1691
11. Rex D K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 2866-2877
12. Becker F, Nusko G, Welke J, et al. Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy: a benefit-risk analysis of German surveillance recommendations. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007 22 929-939
13. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. Gebiet und Bevölkerung Fläche und Bevölkerung. http://www.statistik-portal. de/Statistik-Portal/de-jb01-jahrtab1.asp. Accessed: December 18, 2007.
14. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Mitgliederstatistik KM6. http://www.bmg.bund.de/cln-040/nn-601098/SharedDocs/Download/DE/ Datenbanken-Statistiken/Statistiken-Gesundheit/Gesetzliche-Krankenversicherung/ Mitglieder-und-Versicherte/2006-km6-lang-xls,templateId=raw,property= publicationFile.xls/2006-km6-lang-xls.xls. Accessed: April 28, 2008.
15. Geißendörfer J, Höhn A. Medizinische Psychologie und Soziologie. Munich Elsevier 2007
16. Sieg A, Theilmeier A. Results of coloscopy screening in 2005 an internet-based documentation. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2006 131 379-383
17. BundesausschussderÄrzteundKrankenkassen. Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die Früherkennung von Krebserkrankungen (Krebsfrüherkennungs-Richtlinien). http://www.g-ba.de/downloads/3623217/RL-KFU-20061219.pdf. Accessed: January 2, 2008.
18. Thomeer M, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D, et al. Virtual colonoscopy: a new screening tool for colorectal cancer? JBR-BTR 2001 84 155-163
19. Liang K Y., Zeger S L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986 73 13-22
20. Zeger S L., Liang K Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986 42 121-130
21. TumorregisterMünchen. Basis-Statistiken C18: Kolonkarzinom. http://www.tumorregister-muenchen.de/facts/base/base-C18--G.pdf. Accessed: January 3, 2008.
22. Rex D K., Bond J H., Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 1296-1308
23. Shah H A., Paszat L F., Saskin R, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007 132 2297-2303
24. Cirroco W C., Rusin L C. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995 38 964-968
25. Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Stele A, et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 873-885
26. Anderson J C., Gonzalez J D., Messina C R., Pollack B J. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not alway better. Am J Gastroenterol 2000 95 2784-2787
27. Harewood G C. Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopist features. Dig Dis Sci 2005 50 721-731
28. Ness R M., Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 1797-1802
29. Zubarik R, Fleischer D E., Mastropietro C, et al. Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 50 322-328 (Pubitemid 29418815)
30. Szklo M, Nieto F J. Epidemiology: beyond the basics. Gaithersburg, Maryland Aspen Publishers Inc 2000
31. Mysiliewiec P A., Brown M S., Klabunde C N., et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? Annals Int Med 2004 141 264
32. Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rösch T, et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk Factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy 2005 37 1116-1122
33. Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland. Projekt wissenschaftliche Begleitung von Früherkennungs- Koloskopien in Deutschland: Berichtszeitraum 2006 4. Jahresbericht. www.zi-berlin.de/koloskopie/downloads/Jahresbericht-2006-Berlin- Vers-1-1.pdf. Accessed: September 7, 2009.