Feasibility of a mental practice intervention in stroke patients in nursing homes; a process evaluation

BMC Neurology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Braun, Susy M ^a,b   van Haastregt, Jolanda C ^b,c,d   Beurskens, Anna J ^a   Gielen, Alexandra I ^a   Wade, Derick T ^c,e   Schols, Jos M ^b,c,d  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d Klevarie Nursing Home   (Netherlands)

^e OXFORD CENTRE FOR ENABLEMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGERY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MENTAL TASK; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSING HOME; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST ATTITUDE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPIST ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEACHING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PSYCHOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

AGED; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGERY (PSYCHOTHERAPY); MALE; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; NURSING HOMES; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; STROKE;

EID: 77955822400     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-74     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Commissie CVA-revalidatie Revalidatie na een beroerte, richtlijnen en aanbevelingen voor zorgverleners. 2001, Den Haag: Nederlandse Hartstichting, Commissie CVA-revalidatie.
2. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8:741-54. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4, 19608100.
3. Bernhardt J, Chan J, Nicola I, Collier JM. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med 2007, 39:43-8. 10.2340/16501977-0013, 17225037.
4. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: A critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy 1999, 85:377-91.
5. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004, 35:2529-39. 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d, 15472114.
6. Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T, Wade DT. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87:842-52. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.034, 16731221.
7. Dickstein R, Deutsch JE. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther 2007, 87:942-53.
8. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke?. Stroke 2006, 37:1941-52. 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc, 16741183.
9. van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Hermeling-van der Wel BC, et al. KNGF-richtlijn beroerte. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie 2004, 114(Suppl):1-77.
10. Schols JM, Crebolder HF, van Weel C. Nursing home and nursing home physician: the Dutch experience. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004, 5:207-12. 10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70116-4, 15115583.
11. Braun SM, Kleynen M, Schols JM, Schack T, Beurskens AJ, Wade DT. Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation; a framework. Clin Rehabil 2008, 22:579-591. 10.1177/0269215508090066, 18586809.
12. Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, van Kroonenburgh SM, Demarteau J, Schols JM, Wade DT. Effects of mental practice embedded in daily therapy compared to therapy as usual in adult stroke patients in Dutch nursing homes: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2007, 15:34.
13. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 82:1133-41. 10.1053/apmr.2001.24286, 11494195.
14. Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J, Desrosiers J, Belleville S. Training mobility tasks after stroke with combined mental and physical practice: a feasibility study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004, 18:66-75. 10.1177/0888439004266304, 15228801.
15. Milton J, Small SL, Solodkin A. Imaging motor imagery: methodological issues related to expertise. Methods 2008, 45:336-41. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.05.002, 18762138.
16. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 2006, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 3.
17. Simmons L, Sharma N, Baron JC, Pomeroy VM. Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:458-67. 10.1177/1545968308315597, 18780881.
18. Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, Hui-Chan CW. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 85:1403-8. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.035, 15375808.
19. Dijkerman HC, Letswaart M, Johnston M, MacWalter RS. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2004, 18:538-49. 10.1191/0269215504cr769oa, 15293488.
20. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Johnston MV. A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil 2001, 15:233-40. 10.1191/026921501672063235, 11386392.
21. Moseley GL, Zalucki N, Birklein F, Marinus J, van Hilten JJ, Luomajoki H. Thinking about movement hurts: the effect of motor imagery on pain and swelling in people with chronic arm pain. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 59:623-31. 10.1002/art.23580, 18438892.
22. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Bmj 2008, 337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655, 2769032, 18824488.