Three-dimensional analysis of image-free navigation system for total knee arthroplasty

Musculoskeletal Surgery

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 81-87

  Tigani, D ^a   Rimondi, E ^b   Trentani, P ^a   Ansaloni, M ^b   Amendola, L ^a   Testi, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alignment; Computer navigation system; CT; Three dimensional analysis; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84855166958     PISSN: 20355106     EISSN: 20355114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-010-0090-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM et al (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153-156 (Pubitemid 24051713)
2. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr (1995) Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:106-110
3. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navi-gation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A(2):90-98 (Pubitemid 35168340)
4. Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(1):67-72
5. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):709-714
6. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26-34 (Pubitemid 39506147)
7. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W et al (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based tech-nique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):372-377 (Pubitemid 38559489)
8. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75(1):74-77 (Pubitemid 38264929)
9. Jenny JY, Mielke RK, Kohler S et al (2003) Total knee prosthesis implantation with a non image-based navigation system: a mul-ticentric analysis. Proceedings of 70th annual meeting AAOS, p96
10. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M et al (2003) Useability of an image based navigation system in reconstruction of leg alignment in total knee arthroplasty-results of a prospective study. Biomed Tech Berl 48(12):339-343 (Pubitemid 38036535)
11. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M et al (2004) Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28(2):87-90 (Pubitemid 38543980)
12. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R et al (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22(8):1097-1106 (Pubitemid 350216994)
13. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthropla-sties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102-106 (Pubitemid 26357693)
14. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S et al (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a mu1ti-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):818-823 (Pubitemid 39173467)
15. Viceconti M, Taddei F, Montanari L et al (2007) Multimod Data Manager: a tool for data fusion. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 87(2):148-159 (Pubitemid 47023101)
16. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ et al (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40-47 (Pubitemid 23059466)
17. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B et al (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:49-56 (Pubitemid 28424045)
18. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):830-835 (Pubitemid 36986842)
19. Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S et al (2005) Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 20(7):832-839 (Pubitemid 41463681)
20. Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus con-ventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years foUow-up. Knee 15(2):75-79
21. Prakash U, Wigderowitz CA, McGurty DW et al (2001) Com-puterised measurement of tibiofemoral alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(6):819-824
22. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H et al (2009) Three-dimensional analysis of computed tomography-based navigation system for total knee arthroplasty the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation system. J Arthroplasty 24(7):1103-lHO
23. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U et al (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):236-243 (Pubitemid 46214339)
24. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R et al (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:180-186 (Pubitemid 39167127)
25. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, WoIf C et al (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evalua-tion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(8):1039-1044