Three-dimensional Analysis of Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System for Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1103-1110

  Mizu uchi, Hideki ^a   Matsuda, Shuichi ^a   Miura, Hiromasa ^a   Higaki, Hidehiko ^b   Okazaki, Ken ^a   Iwamoto, Yukihide ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU SANGYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

3 dimensional analysis; alignment; CT; navigation system; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANKLE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70349243682     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., et al. Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125 (2005) 16
2. Dennis D.A., Channer M., Susman M.H., et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8 (1993) 43
3. Kinzel V., Ledger M., and Shakespeare D. Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty?. Knee 12 (2005) 293
4. Laskin R.S. Instrumentation pitfalls: you just can't go on autopilot!. J Arthroplasty 18 3 Suppl 1 (2003) 18
5. Mahaluxmivala J., Bankes M.J., Nicolai P., et al. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 635
6. Mihalko W.M., Boyle J., Clark L.D., et al. The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 25
7. Petersen T.L., and Engh G.A. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3 (1988) 67
8. Matsuda S., Mizu-uchi H., Miura H., et al. Tibial shaft axis does not always serve as a correct coronal landmark in total knee arthroplasty for varus knees. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 56
9. Mizu-uchi H., Matsuda S., Miura H., et al. The effect of ankle rotation on cutting error of the tibia in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 (2006) 2632
10. Amiot L.P., and Poulin F. Computed tomography-based navigation for hip, knee, and spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421 (2004) 77
11. Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 682
12. Bolognesi M., and Hofmann A. Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 (2005) 162
13. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 372
14. Jenny J.Y., Clemens U., Kohler S., et al. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 832
15. Kim S.J., MacDonald M., Hernandez J., et al. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 20 7 Suppl 3 (2005) 123
16. Matziolis G., Krocker D., Weiss U., et al. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 236
17. Nabeyama R., Matsuda S., Miura H., et al. The accuracy of image-guided knee replacement based on computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 366
18. Nizard R.S., Porcher R., Ravaud P., et al. Use of the Cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425 (2004) 180
19. Perlick L., Bathis H., Tingart M., et al. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75 (2004) 464
20. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 830
21. Stockl B., Nogler M., Rosiek R., et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 (2004) 180
22. Victor J., and Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 (2004) 131
23. Berger R.A., Rubash H.E., Seel M.J., et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286 (1993) 40
24. Jenny J.Y., and Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75 (2004) 74
25. Siston R.A., Patel J.J., Goodman S.B., et al. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 2276