Methanogen diversity in the rumen of Indian Surti buffalo (Bubalus bubalis), assessed by 16S rDNA analysis

Research in Veterinary Science

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 451-455

  Singh, K M ^a   Tripathi, A K ^a   Pandya, P R ^a   Parnerkar, S ^a   Rank, D N ^a   Kothari, R K ^b   Joshi, C G ^a  

^a ANAND AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Christ College   (India)

Author keywords

16S rDNA; Methanobacteriales; Methanomicrobiales; Phylotypes; Surti buffaloes

Indexed keywords

DNA 16S;

ARTICLE; BUFFALO; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA EXTRACTION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC SIMILARITY; HYDROGENOTROPHIC METHANOGEN; INDIAN; METHANOBACTERIALES; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; METHANOMICROBIALES; METHANOSARCINA BARKERI; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORGANISM COMMUNITY; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOTYPE; RUMINANT STOMACH; SURTI BUFFALO;

ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BUFFALOES; CLONING, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; METHANE; METHANOBACTERIALES; METHANOSARCINA; PHYLOGENY; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN;

BUBALUS; BUBALUS BUBALIS; METHANOBACTERIALES; METHANOMICROBIALES; METHANOSARCINA BARKERI; OTUS;

EID: 84655173899     PISSN: 00345288     EISSN: 15322661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Angenent L.T., Sung S.W., Raskin L. Methanogenic population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste. Water Research 2002, 36:4648-4654.
2. Banning N., Brock F., Fry J.C., Parkes R.J., Hornibrook E.R.C., Weightman A.J. Investigation of the methanogen population structure and activity in a brackish lake sediment. Environmental Microbiology 2005, 7:947-960.
3. Basiliko N., Yavitt J.B., Dees P.M., Merkel S.M. Methane biogeochemistry and methanogen communities in two northern peatland ecosystems, New York state. Geomicrobiology Journal 2003, 20:563-577.
4. Benson D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi I., Lipman D.J., Ostelland J. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 2007, 35:D1-D25.
5. Castro H., Ogram A., Reddy K.R. Phylogenetic characterization of methanogenic assemblages in eutrophic and oligotrophic areas of the Florida everglades. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004, 70:6559-6568.
6. Chhabra A., Manjunath K.R., Panigrahy S., Parihar J.S. Spatial pattern of methane emissions from Indian livestock. Current Science 2009, 96:5-10.
7. Chin K.J., Lueders T.M., Friedrich W., Klose M., Conrad R. Archaeal community structure and pathway of methane formation on rice roots. Microbial Ecology 2004, 47:59-67.
8. Denman S.E., Tomkins N.W., McSweeney C.S. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS (Federation of European Microbiological Societies) Microbiology - Ecology 2007, 62:313-322.
9. Earl J., Hall G., Pickup R.W., Ritchie D.A., Edwards C. Analysis of methanogen diversity in a hypereutrophic lake using PCR-RFLP analysis of mcr sequences. Microbial Ecology 2003, 46:270-278.
10. Embley T.M., Finlay B.J., Thomas R.H., Dyal P.L. The use of rRNA sequences and fluorescent probes to investigate the phylogenetic positions of the anaerobic ciliate Metopus palaeformis and its archaebacterial endosymbiont. Journal of General Microbiology 1992, 138:1479-1487.
11. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
12. Galand P.E., Saarnio S., Fritze H., Yrjal K. Depth related diversity of methanogen archaea in finnish oligotrophic fen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2002, 42:441-449.
13. ICAR., 1998. Nutrient requirements of livestock and poultry. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, (). http://www.icar.org.in.
14. Jarvis G.N., Strompl C., Burgess D.M., Skillman L.C., Moore E.R., Joblin K.N. Isolation and identification of ruminal methanogens from grazing cattle. Current Microbiology 2000, 40:327-332.
15. Khampa S., Wanapat M., Wachirapakorn C., Nontaso N. Effects of urea level and sodium di-malate in concentrate containing high cassava chip on ruminal fermentation efficiency, microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows raised under tropical condition. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2006, 19:837-844.
16. Liu W.T., Chan O.C., Fang H.H.P. Characterization of microbial community in granular sludge treating brewery wastewater. Water Research 2002, 36:1767-1775.
17. Luton P.E., Wayne J.M., Sharp R.J., Riley P.W. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16s rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology 2002, 148:3521-3530.
18. Madden T.L., Tatusov R.L., Zhan J. Application of network BLAST server. Methods in Enzymology 1996, 266:131-141.
19. Maidak B.L., Cole J.R., Lilburn T.G., Parker C.T. The RDP-II (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Research 2001, 29:173-174.
20. Purdy K.J., Nedwell D.B., Embley T.M. Analysis of the sulfate-reducing bacterial and methanogenic archaeal populations in contrasting Antarctic sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2003, 69:3181-3191.
21. Raskin L., Stromley J.M., Rittmann B.E., Stah D.A. Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1994, 60:1232-1240.
22. Rastogi G., Ranade D.R., Yeole T.Y., Gupta A.K., Patole M.S., Shouche Y.S. Molecular analyses of methanogen diversity associated with cattle dung. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2008, 24:2973-2979.
23. Rocheleau S., Greer C.W., Lawrence J.R., Cantin C., Laramee L., Guiot S.R. Differentiation of Methanosaeta concilii and Methanosarcina barkeri in anaerobic mesophilic granular sludge by fluorescent in situ hybridization and confocal scanning laser microscopy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1999, 65:2222-2229.
24. Saengkerdsub S., Herrera P., Woodward L., Anderson C., Nisbet D.J., Ricke S.C. Detection of methane and quantification of methanogenic archaea in faeces from young broiler chickens using real-time PCR. Letters in Applied Microbiology 2007, 45:629-634.
25. Schloss P.D., Handelsman J. Introducing DOTUR, a compute program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2005, 71:1501-1506.
26. Shin E.C., Choi B.R., Lim W.J., Hong S.Y., An C.L., Cho K.M. Phylogenetic analysis of archaea in three fractions of cow rumen based on the 16S rDNA sequence. Anaerobe 2004, 10:313-319.
27. Sizova M.V., Panikov N.S., Tourova T.P., Flanagan P.W. Isolation and characterization of oligotrophic acido-tolerant methanogenic consortia from a sphagnum peat bog. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2003, 45:301-315.
28. Soliva C.R., Meile L., CieŚlak A., Kreuzer M., Machmuller A. Rumen simulation technique study on the interactions of dietary lauric and myristic acid supplementation in suppressing ruminal methanogenesis. British Journal of Nutrition 2004, 92:689-700.
29. Stewart C.S., Flint H.J., Bryant M.P. The rumen bacteria. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem 1997, 10-72. second ed.
30. Tajima K., Nagamine T., Matsui H., Nakamura M., Aminov R.I. Phylogenetic analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA libraries from the rumen suggests the existence of a novel group of archaea not associated with known methanogens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 2001, 200:67-72.
31. Tamura K., Nei M., Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101:11030-11035.
32. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007, 24:1596-1599.
33. Tatsuoka N., Mohammed N., Mitsumori M., Hara K., Kurihara M., Itabashi H. Phylogenetic analysis of methyl coenzyme-M reductase detected from the bovine rumen. Letters in Applied Microbiology 2004, 39:257-260.
34. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 1994, 22:4673-4680.
35. US Energy Information Administration 2011, http://www.eia.doe.gov.
36. Woese C.R., Kandler O., Wheelis M. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1990, 87:4576-4579.
37. Wright A.D.G., Williams A.J., Winder B., Christophersen C., Rodgers S., Smith K. Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004, 70:1263-1270.
38. Yuangklang C., Wanapat M., Wachirapakorn C. Effects of pelleted sugarcane tops on voluntary feed intake, digestibility and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2005, 18:22-26.
39. Yu Y., Lee C., Kim J., Hwang S. Group-Specific Primer and Probe Sets to Detect Methanogenic Communities Using Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction 2004, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 10.1002/bit.20347.
40. Zheng D., Raskin L. Quantification of Methanosaeta species in anaerobic bioreactors using genus- and species-specific hybridization probes. Microbial Ecology 2000, 39:246-262.
41. Zinder S.H. Physiological ecology of methanogens. Methanogenesis: Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry and Genetics 1993, 128-206. Chapman and Hall, New York. J.G. Ferry (Ed.).