A collection of robust organic synthesis reactions for in silico molecule design

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 3093-3098

  Hartenfeller, Markus ^a   Eberle, Martin ^a   Meier, Peter ^a   Nieto Oberhuber, Cristina ^a   Altmann, Karl Heinz ^b   Schneider, Gisbert ^b   Jacoby, Edgar ^a   Renner, Steffen ^a  

^a NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULES;

CHEMOTYPES; DRUG DISCOVERY; IN-SILICO; NOVEL RING SYSTEM; ORGANIC SYNTHESIS; REAL-WORLD;

SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DRUG DESIGN; FACTUAL DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; SYNTHESIS;

CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES, SYNTHETIC; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN;

EID: 84555220599     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci200379p     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Renner, S.; Popov, M.; Schuffenhauer, A.; Roth, H.-J.; Breitenstein, W.; Marzinzik, A.; Lewis, I.; Krastel, P.; Nigsch, F.; Jenkins, J.; Jacoby, E. Recent trends and observations in the design of high-quality screening collections Fut. Med. Chem. 2011, 3 (6) 751-766
2. Chemical Abstracts Service Database; Chemical Abstracts Service: Columbus, OH, USA.
3. Chemical Abstract Service. http://www.cas.org/expertise/cascontent/ ataglance/index.html (accessed August 8th, 2011).
4. Cooper, T. W. J.; Campbell, I. B.; Macdonald, S. J. F. Factors determining the selection of organic reactions by medicinal chemists and the use of these reactions in arrays (small focused libraries) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8082-8091
5. Roughley, S. D.; Jordan, A. M. The Medicinal Chemist′s Toolbox: An analysis of reactions used in the pursuit of drug candidates J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3451-3479
6. Hartenfeller, M.; Schneider, G. De novo drug design Methods Mol. Biol. (N.Y.) 2011, 672, 299-323
7. Vinkers, H. M.; de Jonge, M. R.; Daeyaert, F. F.; Heeres, J.; Koymans, L. M.; van Lenthe, J. H.; Lewi, P. J.; Timmerman, H.; Van Aken, K.; Janssen, P. A. SYNOPSIS: SYNthesize and Optimize System in Silico J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2765-2773
8. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., Laguna Niguel, CA, USA.
9. Daylight SMARTS Documentation, http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/ theory/theory.smarts.html (accessed August 8th, 2011).
10. Schuerer, S. C.; Tyagi, P.; Muskal, S. M. Prospective Exploration of Synthetically Feasible, Medicinally Relevant Chemical Space J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 239-248
11. Hartenfeller, M.; Zettl, H.; Walter, M.; Rupp, M.; Reisen, F.; Proschak, E.; Weggen, S.; Stark, H.; Schneider. DOGS: Reaction-driven de novo design of bioactive compounds. Submitted.
12. Reisen, F. H.; Schneider, G.; Proschak, E. Reaction-MQL: Line Notation for Functional Transformation J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 6-12
13. RDKit Toolkit, www.rdkit.org (accessed August 8th, 2011).
14. Satoh, T.; Hosokawa, M. The mammalian carboxylesterases: From molecules to functions Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1998, 38, 257-288
15. Schneider, G.; Geppert, T.; Hartenfeller, M.; Reisen, F.; Klenner, A.; Reutlinger, M.; Hähnke, V.; Hiss, J. A.; Zettl, H.; Keppner, S.; Spänkuch, B.; Schneider, P. Reaction-driven de novo design: From virtual compound assembly via target profile prediction to chemical synthesis and biological testing of potential type II kinase inhibitors Fut. Med. Chem. 2011, 3 (4) 415-424