The rapid extraction of gist-early neural correlates of high-level visual processing

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 521-529

  Oppermann, Frank ^a   Hassler, Uwe ^b   Jescheniak, Jörg D ^a   Gruber, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED GAMMA BAND RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84555186885     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00100     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bar, M. (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 600-609.
2. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
3. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 103, 449-454.
4. Başar, E., Rosen, B., Başar-Eroglu, C., & Greitschus, F. (1987). The associations between 40 Hz-EEG and the middle latency response of the auditory evoked potential. International Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 103-117.
5. Bertrand, O., & Pantev, C. (1994). Stimulus frequency dependence of the transient oscillatory auditory evoked responses (40 Hz) studied by electric and magnetic recordings in human. In C. Pantev, T. Elbert, & B. Lutkenhoner (Eds.), Oscillatory event-related brain dynamics (Vol. 271, pp. 231-242). New York: Plenum.
6. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177.
7. Bosch-Bayard, J., Valdes-Sosa, P., Virues-Alba, T., Aubert-Vazquez, E., John, E. R., Harmony, T., et al. (2001). 3D statistical parametric mapping of EEG source spectra by means of variable resolution electromagnetic tomography (VARETA). Clinical Electroencephalography, 32, 47-61.
8. Busch, N. A., Debener, S., Kranczioch, C., Engel, A. K., & Herrmann, C. S. (2004). Size matters: Effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1810-1820.
9. Busch, N. A., Herrmann, C. S., Müller, M. M., Lenz, D., & Gruber, T. (2006). A cross-laboratory study of event-related gamma activity in a standard object recognition paradigm. Neuroimage, 33, 1169-1177.
10. Chaumon, M., Drouet, V., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2008). Unconscious associative memory affects visual processing before 100 ms. Journal of Vision, 8, 10.
11. Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58, 306-324.
12. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 215-229.
13. Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559-564.
14. Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (2001). Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 16-25.
15. Evans, A. C., Collins, D. L., Mills, S. R., Brown, E. D., Kelly, R. L., & Peters, T. M. (1993). 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. In L. A. Klaisner (Ed.), Nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference (Vol. 1-3, pp. 1813-1817). New York: IEEE.
16. Fink, G. R., Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1996). Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? Nature, 382, 626-628.
17. Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474-480.
18. Gordon, R. D. (2004). Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 760-777.
19. Gronau, N., Neta, M., & Bar, M. (2008). Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 371-388.
20. Gruber, T., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., Giabbiconi, C. M., Valdes-Sosa, P. A., & Müller, M. M. (2006). Brain electrical tomography (BET) analysis of induced gamma-band responses during a simple object recognition task. Neuroimage, 29, 888-900.
21. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271.
22. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
23. Herrmann, C. S., Fründ, I., & Lenz, D. (2010). Human gamma-band activity: A review on cognitive and behavioral correlates and network models. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 981-992.
24. Herrmann, C. S., Lenz, D., Junge, S., Busch, N. A., & Maess, B. (2004). Memory-matches evoke human gamma-responses. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 13.
25. Herrmann, C. S., Munk, M. H. J., & Engel, A. K. (2004). Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: Memory match and utilization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 347-355.
26. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791-804.
27. Junghöfer, M., Elbert, T., Tucker, D. M., & Rockstroh, B. (2000). Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology, 37, 523-532.
28. Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
29. Liu, H. S., Agam, Y., Madsen, J. R., & Kreiman, G. (2009). Timing, timing, timing: Fast decoding of object information from intracranial field potentials in human visual cortex. Neuron, 62, 281-290.
30. Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565-572.
31. Malinowski, P., Hübner, R., Keil, A., & Gruber, T. (2002). The influence of response competition on cerebral asymmetries for processing hierarchical stimuli revealed by ERP recordings. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 136-139.
32. Martinovic, J., Gruber, T., & Müller, M. M. (2008). Codingof visual object features and feature conjunctions in the human brain. Plos One, 3, e3781.
33. Meeren, H. K. M., Hadjikhani, N., Ahlfors, S. P., Hamalainen, M. S., & de Gelder, B. (2008). Early category-specific cortical activation revealed by visual stimulus inversion. Plos One, 3, e3503.
34. Müller, M. M., Keil, A., Kissler, J., & Gruber, T. (2001). Suppression of the auditory middle-latency response and evoked gamma-band response in a paired-click paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 474-479.
35. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145-175.
36. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 520-527.
37. Oppermann, F., Hassler, U., & Gruber, T. (in preparation). Effects of high-level scene processing on the evoked gammaband response are task dependent.
38. Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2008). Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 587-601.
39. Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Görges, F. (2010). Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 356-370.
40. Pantev, C., Elbert, T., Makeig, S., Hampson, S., Eulitz, C., & Hoke, M. (1993). Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 88, 389-396.
41. Peyrin, C., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M., Michel, C., Landis, T., & Vuilleumier, P. (2005). Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes. Neuroimage, 28, 464-473.
42. Potter, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187, 965-966.
43. Pourtois, G., Rauss, K. S., Vuilleumier, P., & Schwartz, S. (2008). Effects of perceptual learning on primary visual cortex activity in humans. Vision Research, 48, 55-62.
44. Robertson, L. C., & Ivry, R. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries: Attention to visual and auditory primitives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 59-63.
45. Roye, A., Schröger, E., Jacobsen, T., & Gruber, T. (2010). Is my mobile ringing? Evidence for rapid processing of a personally significant sound in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 7310-7313.
46. Schadow, J., Lenz, D., Thaerig, S., Busch, N. A., Fründ, I., Rieger, J. W., et al. (2007). Stimulus intensity affects early sensory processing: Visual contrast modulates evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66, 28-36.
47. Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges-Evidence for time-scale-dependent and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5, 195-200.
48. Serre, T., Oliva, A., & Poggio, T. (2007). A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 104, 6424-6429.
49. Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24, 49-65.
50. Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 555-586.
51. Strüber, D., Basar-Eroglu, C., Hoff, E., & Stadler, M. (2000). Reversal-rate dependent differences in the EEG gamma-band during multistable visual perception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38, 243-252.
52. Sugase, Y., Yamane, S., Ueno, S., & Kawano, K. (1999). Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature, 400, 869-873.
53. Tallon-Baudry, C., & Bertrand, O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 151-162.
54. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1997). Oscillatory gamma-band (30-70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 722-734.
55. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Wienbruch, C., Ross, B., & Pantev, C. (1997). Combined EEG and MEG recordings of visual 40 Hz responses to illusory triangles in human. NeuroReport, 8, 1103-1107.
56. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
57. Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., Aubert-Vazquez, E., & Valdes-Sosa, P. A. (2004). Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging. Neuroimage, 21, 1300-1319.
58. VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454-461.
59. von der Malsburg, C., & Schneider, W. (1986). A neural cocktail-party processor. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 29-40.
60. Worsley, K. J., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Vandal, A. C., Friston, K. J., & Evans, A. C. (1996). A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Brain Mapping, 4, 58-73.