Factors associated with failed induction of labour in a secondary care hospital

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Khan, Neelofur Babar ^a   Ahmed, Iffat ^a   Malik, Ayesha ^a   Sheikh, Lumaan ^a  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Failed induction; Labour induction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; PAKISTAN; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ADULT; LABOR; LABOR COMPLICATION; NEWBORN; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, INDUCED; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PAKISTAN; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84455208813     PISSN: 00309982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of ceasarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 600-7.
2. Burnett JE Jr. Preinduction scoring: an objective approach to induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1966; 28: 479-83.
3. Rayburn, WF, Zhang, J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:164-7.
4. Moore, LE, Rayburn WF. Elective induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 698-704.
5. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Out come after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obset Gynecol 2002; 186: 240-4.
6. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive induction. Am J Obset Gynecol 1999; 180: 628-33.
7. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as risk factor for cesarean delivery among lowrisk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 917-22.
8. Luthy DA, Malmgern JA, Zingheim RW, Leininger CJ. Physician contribution to a cesarean delivery risk model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1579-85.
9. Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obset Gynecol 2004; 191: 1511-5.
10. NICE clinical guideline 70: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. July 2008.
11. Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 883-7.
12. Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middletaion P. Induction of labor for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD004945.
13. Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Gelisen O, Dilbaz B, Ozturk N, Haberal A. Unsuccessful labor induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management. Aus N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44: 562-7.
14. Park KH, Hong JS, Shin DM, Kang WS. Predicition of failed labor induction in parous women at term: role of previous obstetric history, digital examination and sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35: 301-6.
15. Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D. Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 990-2.
16. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, Sherman ML, McIntire DD. Factors affecting the dose response to oxytocin for induction stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1260-1.
17. Chandra S, Crane JMG, Hutchens D, Yg DC. Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in prediciting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 2-6.
18. Michelson KA, Carr DB, Easterling TR. The impact of duration of labor induction on cesarean rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 299.e1-4.
19. Becmann M. Predicting a failed induction. Aus N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 47: 394-8.
20. Greenberg MB, Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Stotland NE, Bryant AS, Caughey AB. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 743-8.
21. Vahratin A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM. Maternal prepregnancy over-weight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 943-51.
22. Bergholt T, Lim LK, Jorgensen JS, Robson MS. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 163.e1-5.
23. Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Cheng YW, Lyell DJ, Washington AE. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 700-5.
24. Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Arts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 690-7.
25. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Scisclone AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 698-704.