Unsuccessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: Predictors and management

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 562-567

  Caliskan, Eray ^a,b   Dilbaz, Serdar ^a   Gelisen, Orhan ^a   Dilbaz, Berna ^a   Ozturk, Nilgun ^a   Haberal, Ali ^a  

^a Etlik Maternity and Women's Health Teaching Hospital   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Failure; Foley catheter; Labour induction; Management; Misoprostol

Indexed keywords

MISOPROSTOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN DISEASE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT FAILURE; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING; UTERUS CONTRACTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; BALLOON DILATATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DELIVERY; DRUG EFFECT; INTRAVAGINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL; ADULT; BALLOON DILATATION; CERVICAL RIPENING; COHORT STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, INDUCED; LOGISTIC MODELS; MISOPROSTOL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CONTRACTION;

EID: 11344261737     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00321.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964; 24: 266-268.
2. O'Brien WF. Cervical ripening and labor induction. progress and challenges. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 38: 221-223.
3. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2004.
4. Sanches-Ramos L, Kaunit Z.AM. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systemic review of the literature. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 43: 475-488.
5. Meydanli MM, Caliskan E, Haberal A. Prediction of adverse outcome with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 110: 143-148.
6. Senior J, Marshall K, Sangha K, Clayton JK. In vitro characterization of prostanoid receptors on human myometrium at term pregnancy. Br J Pharm. 1993; 108: 501-506.
7. Slater DM, Zervou S, Thornton S. Prostaglandins and prostanoid receptors in human pregnancy and partrution. J Soc Gynecol Invest. 2002; 9: 118-124.
8. Navitsky J, Greene JF, Curry SL. The onset of human labor: current theories. Prim care update. Ob/Gyns. 2000; 7: 197-199.
9. Song J. Use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000; 55: 503-510.
10. Ramsey PS, Ogburn PL, Harris OY, Heise RH, Ramin KD. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 1616-1619.
11. Ludmir J, Sehdev HM. Anatomy and physiology of the uterine cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 43: 433-439.
12. Weiss G. Endocrinology of partrution. J Clin Endoc Metab. 2000; 85: 4421-4425.
13. Gonen R., Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound. 1998; 7: 183-187.
14. Wave V, Raynor D. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 1030-1032.
15. Rane SM, Pandis GK, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval. Utrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 22: 40-44.
16. Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L. The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavourable. Utrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 567-573.
17. Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 603-607.
18. Barrilleax PS, Bofill JA, Terrone DA, Magann EF, May WL, Mattison JC. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of three techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 1124-1129.
19. Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol. J Reprod Med. 2001; 46: 899-904.