Can behavioral and personality traits influence the success of unintentional species introductions?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 57-64

  Chapple, David G ^a   Simmonds, Sarah M ^a   Wong, Bob B M ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DISPERSAL; HOME RANGE; NATIVE SPECIES;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84455205708     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.010     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Elton C.S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants 1958, University of Chicago Press.
2. Lockwood J.L., et al. Invasion Ecology 2007, Blackwell Publishing.
3. Davis M.A. Invasion Biology 2009, Oxford University Press.
4. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: the Legacy of Charles Elton 2011, Wiley-Blackwell. D.M. Richardson (Ed.).
5. Colautti R.I., et al. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invas. 2006, 8:1023-1037.
6. Suarez A.V., Tsutsui N.D. The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:351-360.
7. Suarez A.V., et al. The role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:17032-17035.
8. Hulme P.E. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:10-18.
9. Wilson J.R.U., et al. Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:136-144.
10. Blackburn T.M., et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:333-339.
11. Kolar C.S., Lodge D.M. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:199-204.
12. Hayes K.R., Barry S.C. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success?. Biol. Invas. 2008, 10:483-506.
13. Lockwood J.L., et al. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:223-228.
14. Simberloff D. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:81-102.
15. Lockwood J.L., et al. The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15:904-910.
16. Sol D., et al. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim. Behav. 2002, 63:495-502.
17. Sol D., et al. Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced to novel environments. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:S63-S71.
18. Blackburn T.M., et al. The role of species traits in the establishment success of exotic birds. Global Change Biol. 2009, 15:2852-2860.
19. Lester P.J. Determinants for the successful establishment of exotic ants in New Zealand. Divers. Distrib. 2005, 11:279-288.
20. Holway D.A., Suarez A.V. Animal behavior: an essential component of invasion biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:328-330.
21. Kraus F. Alien Reptiles and Amphibians 2009, Springer.
22. Puth L.M., Post D.M. Studying invasion: have we missed the boat?. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:715-721.
23. Floerl O., Inglis G.J. Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biol. Invas. 2005, 7:589-606.
24. Ward D.F., et al. The diversity and origin of exotic ants arriving in New Zealand via human-mediated dispersal. Divers. Distrib. 2006, 12:601-609.
25. Alpert P. The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced. Biol. Invas. 2006, 8:1523-1534.
26. Tingley R., et al. The frog filter: amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2010, 19:496-503.
27. Phillips, B.L. and Suarez, A. The role of behavioural variation in the invasion of new areas. In Behavioural Responses to a Changing World:Mechanisms and Consequences (Candolin, U. and Wong, B.B.M., eds), Oxford University Press.(in press).
28. Duncan R.P., et al. The ecology of bird introductions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:71-98.
29. Weis J.S. The role of behavior in the success of invasive crustaceans. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 2010, 43:83-98.
30. Toy S.J., Newfield M.J. The accidental introduction of invasive animals as hitchhikers through inanimate pathways: a New Zealand perspective. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2010, 29:123-133.
31. Wright T.F., et al. Behavioral flexibility and species invasions: the adaptive flexibility hypothesis. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2010, 22:393-404.
32. Chapple D.G., et al. Know when to run, know when to hide: can behavioural differences explain the divergent invasion success of two sympatric lizards?. Ecol. Evol. 2011, 1:278-289.
33. Cote J., et al. Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 2010, 277:1571-1579.
34. Taylor C.M., Hastings A. Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:895-908.
35. Tobin P.C., et al. Exploiting Allee effects for managing biological invasions. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:615-624.
36. Lee C.E., Gelembiuk G.E. Evolutionary origins of invasive populations. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1:427-448.
37. Suarez A.V., et al. Genetics and behavior of a colonizing species: the invasive Argentine ant. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:S72-S84.
38. King J.R., et al. A case study of human exacerbation of the invasive species problem: transport and establishment of polygene fire ants in Tallahassee, Florida, USA. Biol. Invas. 2009, 11:373-377.
39. van Kleunen M., et al. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:947-958.
40. Short K.H., Petren K. Boldness underlies foraging success of invasive Lepidodactylus lugubris geckos in the human landscape. Anim. Behav. 2008, 76:429-437.
41. Evans J., et al. Behavioural syndromes in urban and rural populations of song sparrows. Ethology 2010, 116:588-595.
42. Sih A., et al. Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Quart. Rev. Biol. 2004, 79:241-277.
43. Ruiz G.M., Carlton J.T. Invasive Species. Vectors and Management Strategies 2003, Island Press.
44. Hulme P.E., et al. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:403-414.
45. Gill B.J., et al. Records of foreign reptiles and amphibians accidentally imported to New Zealand. N. Z. J. Zool. 2001, 28:351-359.
46. Holway D.A., et al. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33:181-233.
47. Savidge J.A., et al. Reproductive biology of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis (Reptilia: Colubridae), during colonization of Guam and comparison with that in their native range. Pac. Sci. 2007, 61:191-199.
48. Tsutsui N.D., et al. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:5948-5953.
49. Suarez A.V., et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of intraspecific aggression in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim. Behav. 2002, 64:697-708.
50. Tsutsui N.D., Suarez A.V. The colony structure and population biology of invasive ants. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17:48-58.
51. Heinze J., et al. Stealthy invaders: the biology of Cardiocondyla tramp ants. Insectes Soc. 2006, 53:1-7.
52. Abbott K.L., et al. Behaviourally and genetically distinct populations of an invasive ant provides insight into invasion history and impacts on a tropical ant community. Biol. Invas. 2007, 9:453-463.
53. Rowles A.D., O'Dowd D.J. Interference competition by Argentine ants displaces native ants: implications for biotic resistance to invasion. Biol. Invas. 2007, 9:73-85.
54. Carpintero S., Reyes-Lopez J. The role of competitive dominance in the invasive ability of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Biol. Invas. 2008, 10:25-35.
55. Ugelvig L.V., et al. The introduction history of invasive garden ants in Europe: integrating genetic, chemical and behavioural approaches. BMC Biol. 2008, 6:11.
56. Dame E.A., Petren K. Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and displacement in Pacific Island geckos (Hemidactylus). Anim. Behav. 2006, 71:1165-1173.
57. Rehage J.S., Sih A. Dispersal behavior, boldness, and the link to invasiveness: a comparison of four Gambusia species. Biol. Invas. 2004, 6:379-391.
58. Rehage J.S., et al. Behavioral responses to a novel predator and competitor of invasive mosquitofish and their non-invasive relatives (Gambusia sp.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2005, 57:256-266.
59. Rehage J.S., et al. Foraging behaviour and invasiveness: do invasive Gambusia exhibit higher feeding rates and broader diets than their noninvasive relatives?. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 2005, 14:352-360.
60. Usio N., et al. Species displacement between an introduced and a 'vulnerable' crayfish: the role of aggressive interactions and shelter competition. Biol. Invas. 2001, 3:179-185.
61. Barbaresi S., et al. Ranging behaviour of the invasive crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard). J. Nat. Hist. 2004, 38:2821-2832.
62. Gherardi F., Daniels W.H. Agonism and shelter competition between invasive and indigenous crayfish species. Can. J. Zool. 2004, 82:1923-1932.
63. Bubb D.H., et al. Movement, dispersal and refuge use of co-occurring introduced and native crayfish. Freshw. Biol. 2006, 51:1359-1368.
64. MacDonald J.A., et al. The invasive green crab and Japanese shore crab: behavioral interactions with a native crab species, the blue crab. Biol. Invas. 2007, 9:837-848.
65. Pintor L.M., et al. Differences in aggression, activity and boldness between native and introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. Oikos 2008, 117:1629-1636.
66. Pintor L.M., et al. Behavioral correlations provide a mechanism for explaining high invader densities and increased impacts on native prey. Ecology 2009, 90:581-587.
67. Mack R.N., et al. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10:689-710.
68. Kolbe J.J., et al. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 2004, 431:177-181.
69. Skarpaas O., Okland B. Timber import and the risk of forest pest introductions. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:55-63.
70. Sagata K., Lester P.J. Behavioural plasticity associated with propagule size, sources and the invasion success of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:19-27.
71. Martin L.B., Fitzgerald L. A taste for novelty in invading house sparrows, Passer domesticus. Behav. Ecol 2005, 16:702-707.
72. Hughes D.P., Cremer S. Plasticity in antiparasite behaviours and its suggested role in invasion biology. Anim. Behav. 2007, 74:1593-1599.
73. Sol D., et al. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:5460-5465.
74. Amiel J.J., et al. Smart moves: effects of relative brain size on establishment success of invasive amphibians and reptiles. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18277.
75. Marsico T.D., et al. Underutilized resources for studying the evolution of invasive species during their introduction, establishment and lag phases. Evol. Appl. 2010, 3:203-219.
76. Kolbe J.J., et al. Multiple sources, admixture, and genetic variation in introduced Anolis lizard populations. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:1612-1625.
77. Suarez A.V., et al. Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:1095-1100.
78. Aubry S., et al. Active and passive dispersal of an invading land snail in Mediterranean France. J. Anim. Ecol. 2006, 75:802-813.
79. White A.W., Shine R. The extra-limital spread of an invasive species via 'stowaway' dispersal: toad to nowhere?. Anim. Conserv. 2009, 12:38-45.
80. Phillips B.L., et al. Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 2006, 439:803.
81. Phillips B.L., et al. Reid's paradox revisited: the evolution of dispersal kernels during range expansion. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:S34-S48.
82. Llewelyn J., et al. Locomotor performance in an invasive species: cane toads from the invasion front have greater endurance, but not speed, compared to conspecifics from a long-colonised area. Oecologia 2010, 162:343-348.
83. Duckworth R.A., Badyaev A.V. Coupling of dispersal and aggression facilitates the rapid range expansion of a passerine bird. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:15017-15022.
84. Duckworth R.A., Kruuk L.E.B. Evolution of genetic integration between dispersal and colonization ability in a bird. Evolution 2009, 63:968-977.
85. Sih A., et al. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:372-378.
86. Fogarty S., et al. Social personality polymorphism and the spread of invasive species: a model. Am. Nat. 2011, 177:273-287.
87. Reale D., et al. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev. 2007, 82:291-318.
88. Cote J., et al. Personality-dependent dispersal in the invasive mosquitofish: group composition matters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2011, 278:1670-1678.
89. Pintor L.M., Sih A. Differences in growth and foraging behavior of native and introduced populations in an invasive crayfish. Biol. Invas. 2009, 11:1895-1902.
90. Polo-Cavia N., et al. Interspecific differences in responses to predation risk may confer competitive advantages to invasive freshwater turtle species. Ethology 2008, 114:115-123.
91. Russell J.C., et al. Exploratory behaviour of colonizing rats in novel environments. Anim. Behav. 2010, 79:159-164.
92. Liu S.S., et al. Asymmetric mating interactions drive widespread invasion and displacement in a whitefly. Science 2007, 318:1769-1772.
93. Polo-Cavia N., et al. Interspecific differences in heat exchange rates may affect competition between introduced and native freshwater turtles. Biol. Invas. 2009, 11:1755-1765.
94. Polo-Cavia N., et al. Competitive interactions during basking between native and invasive freshwater turtle species. Biol. Invas. 2010, 12:2141-2152.