Underutilized resources for studying the evolution of invasive species during their introduction, establishment, and lag phases

Evolutionary Applications

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 203-219

  Marsico, Travis D ^a   Burt, Jennifer W ^b   Espeland, Erin K ^c   Gilchrist, George W ^d   Jamieson, Mary A ^e   Lindström, Leena ^f   Roderick, George K ^g   Swope, Sarah ^h,j   SzuOdouble ́cs, Marianna ⁱ   Tsutsui, Neil D ^g  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^d The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h WESTERN REGIONAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Biological control; Evolution; Horticultural invasion; Invasive species; Lag phase; Natural history collections; Specimens

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954299439     PISSN: 17524563     EISSN: 17524571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00101.x     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Adriaens T, San Martin G, Gomez Y, Maes D. Invasion history, habitat preferences and phenology of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Belgium. BioControl 2008, 53:69-88.
2. Barratt B I P, Moeed A. Environmental safety of biological control: policy and practice in New Zealand. Biological Control 2005, 35:247-252.
3. Bell C E, Wilen C A, Stanton A E. Invasive plants of horticultural origin. Hortscience 2003, 38:14-16.
4. Berry J A. The bethyline species (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae: Bethylinae) imported into New Zealand for biological control of pest leafrollers. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 1998, 25:329-333.
5. Bigler F, Bale J S, Cock M J W, Dreyer H, Greatrex R, Kuhlmann U, Loomans A. Guidelines on information requirements for import and release of invertebrate biological control agents in European countries. Biocontrol News and Information 2005a, 26:115N-123N.
6. Bigler F, Loomans A, van Lenteren J. Harmonization of the regulation of invertebrate biological control agents in Europe. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, Davos, Switzerland. FHTET-2005-08 2005b, 692-700. Hoddle M S, ed, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV
7. Bisby F A. The quiet revolution: biodiversity informatics and the internet. Science 2000, 289:2309-2312.
8. Blossey B. Chapter 1. Monitoring weed biological control programs. Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the United States 2004, 95-105. Coombs E MClark J KPiper G LCofrancesco A F. eds, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR
9. Blossey B, Nötzgold R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 1995, 83:887-889.
10. Brown P M J, Roy H E, Rothery P, Roy D B, Ware R L, Majerus M E N. Harmonia axyridis in Great Britain: analysis of the spread and distribution of a non-native coccinellid. BioControl 2008, 53:55-67.
11. Bush G L, Neck R W. Ecological genetics of the screwworm fly, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and its bearing on the quality control of mass-reared insects. Environmental Entomology 1976, 5:821-826.
12. Canhos V P, Souza S, Giovanni R, Canhos D A L. Global biodiversity informatics: setting the scene for a "New World" of ecological modeling. Biodiversity Informatics 2004, 1:1-13.
13. Carman H F, Rodriguez A M. Economic Contributions of the California Nursery Industry 2004, Giannini Foundation Information Series No. 4-1, Regents of the University of California, Oakland
14. Causey D, Janzen D H, Peterson A T, Vieglais D, Kristalka L, Beach J H, Wiley E O. Museum collections and taxonomy. Science 2004, 305:1106-1107.
15. Clausen C P. Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review 1978, USDA Agricultural Handbook 480, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
16. Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the United States 2004, Coombs E MClark J KPiper G LCofrancesco A F. eds, Oregon State University Press, Corvalis, OR, pp
17. Coulson J R. Documentation of classical biological control introductions. Crop Protection 1992, 11:195-205.
18. Coulson J R, Coombs E M, Villegas B. Chapter 1. Documentation. Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the United States 2004, 47-49. Coombs E M, Clark J K, Piper G LCofrancesco A F. eds, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR
19. Crawford P H C, Hoagland B W. Can herbarium records be used to map alien species invasion and native species expansion over the past 100 years? Journal of Biogeography 2009, 36:651-661.
20. Crawley M J. The population biology of invaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 1986, 314:711-731.
21. Crowell K L. Experimental zoogeography: introductions of mice to small islands. The American Naturalist 1973, 107:535-558.
22. D'Antonio C M, Jackson N E, Horvitz C C, Hedberg R. Invasive plants in wildland ecosystems: merging the study of invasion processes with management needs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2004, 2:513-521.
23. Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M. The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conservation Biology 2007, 21:224-231.
24. Dlugosch K M, Parker I M. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Molecular Ecology 2008a, 17:431-449.
25. Dlugosch K M, Parker I M. Invading populations of an ornamental shrub show rapid life history evolution despite genetic bottlenecks. Ecology Letters 2008b, 11:701-709.
26. Ebenhard T. An experimental test of the island colonization survival model - bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) populations with different demographic parameter values. Journal of Biogeography 1987, 14:213-223.
27. Edwards J L, Lane M A, Nielsen E S. Interoperability of biodiversity databases: biodiversity information on every desktop. Science 2000, 289:2312-2314.
28. Ehler L E. Invasion biology and biological control. Biological Control 1998, 13:127-133.
29. Safe use of biological control. First import of exotic biological control agents for research under contained conditions. EPPO Bulletin 1999, 29:271-272.
30. Import and release of exotic biological control agents. EPPO Bulletin 2001, 31:33-35.
31. List of biological control agents widely used in the EPPO region. 2008, http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/biocontrol_web/bio_list.htm, Standards on Safe use of Biological Control - PM 6/3(3). (accessed on 20 April 2009)
32. Exectutive order 13112 of February 3, 1999: invasive species. Federal Register 1999, 64:6183-6186.
33. Fagan W F, Lewis M A, Neubert M G, van den Driessche P. Invasion theory and biological control. Ecology Letters 2002, 5:148-157.
34. Fauvergue X, Hopper K R. French wasps in the New World: experimental biological control introductions reveal a demographic Allee effect. Population Ecology 2009, 51:358-397.
35. Fauvergue X, Malausa J C, Giuge L, Courchamp F. Invading parasitoids suffer no Allee effect: a manipulative field experiment. Ecology 2007, 88:2392-2403.
36. Floerl O, Inglis G J, Dey K, Smith A. The importance of transport hubs in stepping-stone invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 46:37-45.
37. Forsyth D M, Duncan R P. Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. The American Naturalist 2001, 157:583-595.
38. Frappier B, Lee T D, Olson K F, Eckert R T. Small-scale invasion pattern, spread rate, and lag-phase behavior of Rhamnus frangula L. Forest Ecology and Management 2003, 186:1-6.
39. Getz W M. A hypothesis regarding the abruptness of density dependence and the growth rate of populations. Ecology 1996, 77:2014-2026.
40. Graham C H, Ferrier S, Huettman F, Moritz C, Peterson A T. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004, 19:497-503.
41. Grapputo A, Boman S, Lindström L, Lyytinen A, Mappes J. The voyage of an invasive species across continents: genetic diversity of North American and European Colorado potato beetle populations. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:4207-4219.
42. Greathead D J. Parasitoids in classical biological control. Insect Parasitoids 1986, 290-318. Waage JGreathead D. eds, Academic Press Inc., London
43. Guralnick R, Hill A. Biodiversity informatics: automated approaches for documenting global biodiversity patterns and processes. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:421-428.
44. Hajek A E. Natural Enemies: An Introduction to Biological Control 2004, Cambridge University Press, New York
45. Harrison L, Moeed A, Sheppard A. Regulation of the release of biological control agents of arthropods in New Zealand and Australia. Second International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods 2005, 715-725. Davos, Switzerland, 12-16 September 2005, pp
46. Hartley C J, Newcomb R D, Russell R J, Yong C G, Stevens J R, Yeates D K, La Salle J. Amplification of DNA from preserved specimens shows blowflies were preadapted for the rapid evolution of insecticide resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:8757-8762.
47. Hastings A. Models of spatial spread: is the theory complete? Ecology 1996, 77:1675-1679.
48. Hee J J, Holway D A, Suarez A V, Case T J. Role of propagule size in the success of incipient colonies of the invasive Argentine ant. Conservation Biology 2000, 14:559-563.
49. Hobbs R J, Humphries S E. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conservation Biology 1995, 9:761-770.
50. Hopper K R, Roush R T, Powell W. Management of genetics of biological-control introductions. Annual Review of Entomology 1993, 38:27-51.
51. Horner T. Chapter I. Permitting. Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the United States 2004, 42-46. Coombs E MClark J KPiper G LCofrancesco A F. eds, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR
52. Huber J T. The importance of voucher specimens, with practical guidelines for preserving specimens of the major invertebrate phyla for identification. Journal of Natural History 1998, 32:367-385.
53. Hufbauer R A. Pea aphid-parasitoid interactions: have parasitoids adapted to differential resistance? Ecology 2001, 82:717-725.
54. Hufbauer R A. Evidence for nonadaptive evolution in parasitoid virulence following a biological control introduction. Ecological Applications 2002, 12:66-78.
55. Hufbauer R A, Roderick G K. Microevolution in biological control: mechanisms, patterns, and processes. Biological Control 2005, 35:227-239.
56. ISPM No. 3. Guidelines for the Export, Shipment, Import and Release of Biological Control Agents and Other Beneficial Organisms 2005, In International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures No. 1 to 24, pp 23-32, Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, FAO 2006, Rome
57. Jeschke J M, Strayer D L. Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:7198-7202.
58. Jonsen I D, Bourchier R S, Roland J. Influence of dispersal, stochasticity, and an Allee effect on the persistence of weed biocontrol introductions. Ecological Modelling 2007, 203:521-526.
59. Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds 1998, Julien M HGriffiths M W. eds, 4th edn, CAB International, Wallingford, UK
60. Allee effects, adaptive evolution, and invasion successs: Evolutionary Applications 2010, 3. Kanarek A RWebb C T.
61. Kareiva P. Contributions of ecology to biological control. Ecology 1996, 77:1963-1964.
62. Keane R M, Crawley M J. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2002, 17:164-170.
63. Keitt T H, Lewis M A, Holt R D. Allee effects, invasion pinning, and species' borders. The American Naturalist 2001, 157:203-216.
64. Kleijn D, Raemakers I. A retrospective analysis of pollen host plant use by stable and declining bumble bee species. Ecology 2008, 89:1811-1823.
65. van Klinken R D, Edwards O R. Is host-specificity of weed biological control agents likely to evolve rapidly following establishment? Ecology Letters 2002, 5:590-596.
66. Knutson L. Voucher material in entomology: a status report. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 1984, 30:8-11.
67. Knutson L, Thompson F C, Carlson R W. Biosystematic and biological control information systems in entomology. Agricultural Zoology Reviews 1987, 2:361-412.
68. Kolar C S, Lodge D M. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2001, 16:199-204.
69. Kowarik I. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien spcieces. Plant Invasions - General Aspects and Special Problems 1995, 15-38. Pyšek PPrach KRejmanek MWade M. eds, SPB Academic, Amsterdam
70. Kramer A, Sarnelle O. Limits to genetic bottlenecks and founder events imposed by the Allee effect. Oecologia 2008, 157:561-569.
71. Krishtalka L, Humphrey P S. Can natural history museums capture the future? BioScience 2000, 50:611-617.
72. Lande R. Demographic stochasticity and Allee effect on a scale with isotropic noise. Oikos 1998, 83:353-358.
73. Lane M A. Roles of natural history collections. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1996, 83:536-545.
74. Lombaert E, Malausa T, Devred R, Estoup A. Phenotypic variation in invasive and biocontrol populations of the harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis. BioControl 2008, 53:89-102.
75. Loomans A J M. Regulation of invertebrate biological control agents in Europe: review and recommendations in its pursuit of a harmonised regulatory system. 2007, http://www.rebeca-net.de/index.php?p=370, Report EU project REBECA [Regulation of Biological Control Agents]. (accessed on 6 June 2009)
76. Mack R N. The commercial seed trade: an early disperser of weeds in the United States. Economic Botany 1991, 45:257-273.
77. Mack R N. Predicting the identity of plant invaders: future contributions from horticulture. Hortscience 2005, 40:1168-1174.
78. Mack R N, Erneberg M. The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate introductions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2002, 89:176-189.
79. Mack R N, Simberloff D, Lonsdale W M, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz F A. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 2000, 10:689-710.
80. Marchetti M P, Moyle P B, Levine R. Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecological Applications 2004, 14:587-596.
81. McDonald I C. Ecological genetics and the sampling of insect populations for laboratory colonization. Environmental Entomology 1976, 5:815-820.
82. McFadyen R E C. Biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 1998, 43:369-393.
83. McFadyen R E C. Successes in biocontrol of weeds. Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 2000, 3-14. Spencer N R. ed, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT
84. Memmott J, Craze P G, Harman H M, Syrett P, Fowler S V. The effect of propagule size on the invasion of an alien insect. Journal of Animal Ecology 2005, 74:50-62.
85. Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests 2002, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
86. Guidance for Information Requirements for Regulation of Invertebrates as Biological Control Agents (IBCAs) 2004, OECD Series on Pesticides 21, OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Paris
87. Pemberton R W, Liu H. Marketing time predicts naturalization of horticultural plants. Ecology 2009, 90:69-80.
88. Peterson A T. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. The Quarterly Review of Biology 2003, 78:419-433.
89. Phillips B L, Shine R. Allometry and selection in a novel predator-prey system: Australian snakes and the invading cane toad. Oikos 2006, 112:122-130.
90. Phillips C B, Baird D B, Iline I I, McNeill M R, Proffitt J R, Goldson S L, Kean J M. East meets west: adaptive evolution of an insect introduced for biological control. Journal of Applied Ecology 2008, 45:948-956.
91. Pyšek P, Prach K. Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. Journal of Biogeography 1993, 20:413-420.
92. Radosevich S R, Stubbs M M, Ghersa C M. Plant invasions - process and patterns. Weed Science 2003, 51:254-259.
93. Reichard S H, Hamilton C W. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 1997, 11:193-203.
94. Reichard S H, White P. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. BioScience 2001, 51:103-113.
95. Richter-Dyn N, Goel N S. On the extinction of a colonizing species. Theoretical Population Biology 1972, 3:406-433.
96. Roderick G K, Navajas M. Genes in new environments: genetics and evolution in biological control. Nature Reviews 2003, 4:889-899.
97. Russello M A, Avery M L, Wright T F. Genetic evidence links invasive monk parakeet populations in the United States to the international pet trade. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008, 8:217.
98. Sakai A K, Allendorf F W, Holt J S, Lodge D M, Molofsky J, With K A, Baughman S. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2001, 32:305-332.
99. Sarkar I N. Biodiversity informatics: organizing and linking information across the spectrum of life. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2007, 8:347-357.
100. Schoener T W, Schoener A. The time to extinction of a colonizing propagule of lizards increases with island area. Nature 1983, 302:332-334.
101. Schroeder D, Goeden R D. The search for arthropod natural enemies of introduced weeds for biological control - in theory and practice. Biocontrol News and Information 1986, 7:147-155.
102. Sexton J P, McKay J K, Sala A. Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow saltcedar to invade cold climates in North America. Ecological Applications 2002, 12:1652-1660.
103. Shields M, Willits F K. The growing importance of the environmental horticulture industry in the agricultural economy of the Northeastern United States. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2003, 32:259-271.
104. Suarez A V, Tsutsui N D. The value of museum collections for research and society. BioScience 2004, 54:66-74.
105. Suarez A V, Tsutsui N D. The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions. Molecular Ecology 2008, 17:351-360.
106. Suarez A V, Holway D A, Ward P S. The role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:17032-17035.
107. Tobin P C, Whitmire S L, Johnson D M, Bjornstad O N, Liebhold A M. Invasion speed is affected by geographical variation in the strength of Allee effects. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:36-43.
108. Nursery stock regulations: advance notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments. Federal Register 2004, 69:71736-71744.
109. Vieglais C M C, Harrison L. Conditional release of new organisms in New Zealand. New Zealand Plant Protection 2004, 57:161-165.
110. Wangen S R, Webster C R. Potential for multiple lag phases during biotic invasions: reconstructing an invasion of the exotic tree Acer platanoides. Journal of Applied Ecology 2006, 43:258-268.
111. Ward D F. Modelling the potential geographic distribution of invasive ant species in New Zealand. Biological Invasions 2007, 9:723-735.
112. Warner K D, Getz C, Maurano S, Powers K. An analysis of historical trends in classical biological control of arthropods suggests need for a new centralized database in the USA. Biocontrol Science and Technology 2009, 19:675-688.
113. Whitney K D, Gabler C A. Rapid evolution in introduced species, 'invasive traits' and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Diversity and Distributions 2008, 14:569-580.
114. Wiens J J, Graham C H. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2005, 36:519-539.
115. Williamson M H, Fitter A. The characteristics of successful invaders. Biological Conservation 1996, 78:163-170.
116. Wilson F. Biological control and the genetics of colonizing species. The Genetics of Colonizing Species 1965, 307-330. Baker H GStebbins G L. eds, Academic Press, New York
117. Yoshida T, Goka K, Ishihama F, Ishihara M, Kudo S. Biological invasion as a natural experiment of the evolutionary processes: introduction to the special feature. Ecological Research 2007, 22:849-854.
118. Zangerl A R, Berenbaum M R. Increase in toxicity of an invasive weed after reassociation with its coevolved herbivore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:15529-15532.