Integration matters: Rethinking the architecture of international dispute resolution

University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-55

  Spain, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84455175856     PISSN: 10867872     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (161)

1. JACOB BERCOVITCH & RICHARD JACKSON, CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: PRINCIPLES, METHODS, AND APPROACHES (2009)
2. ROSALYN HIGGINS, Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process, reprinted in THEMES AND THEORIES: SELECTED ESSAYS, SPEECHES, AND WRITINGS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 19, 19-43 (2009)
3. JAMES CRAWFORD, International Law as an Open System, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AS AN OPEN SYSTEM: SELECTED ESSAYS 17, 18 (2002).
4. Philippe Sands, Introduction to RUTH MACKENZIE ET AL., THE MANUAL ON INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, at ix, xi-xiii (2010)
5. Cesare P. R. Romano, The Shift from the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent, 39 NYUJ. INT'L L. & POL. 791, 792-95 (2007)
6. Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Not Quite a World Without Trials: Why International Dispute Resolution is Increasingly Judicialized, 2006 J. DISP. RESOL. 119.
7. Richard B. Bilder, Adjudication: International Arbitral Tribunals and Courts, in PEACEMAKING IN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: METHODS & TECHNIQUES 155, 174 (I. William Zartman & J. Lewis Rasmussen eds., 1997)
8. How the Court Works, INT'L COURT OF JUSTICE, http://www.icj-cij.org/ court/index.php?p1=1&p2=6 (last visited Oct. 22, 2010)
9. MEREDITH REID SARKEES & FRANK WHELON WAYMAN, RESORT TO WAR 1816-2007, at 562-65 (2010)
10. ROBERT A. HINDE, BENDING THE RULES: MORALITY IN THE MODERN WORLD-FROM RELATIONSHIPS TO POLITICS AND WAR 199-224 (2007)
11. JACOB BERCOVITCH & JUDITH FRETTER, REGIONAL GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT AND MANAGEMENT FROM 1945 TO 2003, 29.
12. Jacob Bercovitch & Scott Sigmund Gartner, Is There Method in the Madness of Mediation? Some Lessons for Mediators from Quantitative Studies of Mediation, 32 INT'L INTERACTIONS 329, 331-33 (2006)
13. Derrick V. Frazier & William J. Dixon, Third-Party Intermediaries and Negotiated Settlements, 1946-2000, 32 INT'L INTERACTIONS 385, 395 tbl.3 (2006)
14. JOHN COLLIER & VAUGHAN LOWE, THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: INSTITUTIONS AND PROCEDURES (1999)
15. RUTH MACKENZIE ET AL., THE MANUAL ON INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS (2d ed. 2010)
16. J.G. MERRILLS, INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (4th ed. 2005)
17. Frontier Dispute, (Burk. Faso/Mali), 1986 I.C.J. 554 (Dec. 22)
18. Stephen D. Krasner, Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables, 36 INT'L ORG. 185, 185 (1982)
19. HOWARD RAIFFA, THE ART AND SCIENCE OF NEGOTIATION (1982)
20. LEONARD L. RISKIN & JAMES E. WESTBROOK, DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND LAWYERS (2d ed. 1997)
21. Frank E. A. Sander, Professor of Law, Harvard Univ., Varieties of Dispute Processing (Apr. 8, 1976), in THE POUND CONFERENCE: PERSPECTIVES ON JUSTICE IN THE FUTURE 65 (A. Leo Levin & Russell R. Wheeler eds., 1979)
22. Richard B. Bilder, Some Limitations of Adjudication as an International Dispute Settlement Technique, 23 VA. J. INT'L L. 1, 11 (1982)
23. DANIEL TERRIS ET AL., THE INTERNATIONAL JUDGE: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO DECIDE THE WORLD'S CASES 1-4 (2007)
24. CESARE P.R. ROMANO & THE PROJECT ON COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIARY IN CONTEXT: A SYNOPTIC CHART, available at http://www.pict-pcti.org/publications/synoptic-chart/synop-c4.pdf
25. MICHAEL BRECHER & JONATHAN WILKENFELD, A STUDY OF CRISIS 185 (2000).
26. NADJA ALEXANDER, INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE MEDIATION: LEGAL PERSPECTIVES 48 (2009)
27. Louis Kriesberg, The Development of the Conflict Resolution Field, in PEACEMAKING IN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: METHODS & TECHNIQUES 51, 51-63 (I. William Zartman & J. Lewis Rasmussen eds., 1997)
28. MIREILLE DELMAS-MARTY, ORDERING PLURALISM: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING THE TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL WORLD (Naomi Norberg trans., 2009)
29. Dominique Alheritiere, Settlement of Public International Disputes on Shared Resources: Elements of a Comparative Study of International Instruments, 25 NAT. RESOURCES J. 701, 703-05 (1985)
30. Andrea K. Schneider, Bargaining in the Shadow of (International) Law: What the Normalization of Adjudication in International Governance Regimes Means for Dispute Resolution, 41 NYUJ. INT'L. L. & POL. 789, 793 (2009)
31. Susan D. Franck, Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict and Dispute Systems Design, 92 MINN. L. REV. 161, 201 (2007)
32. Christopher Shen, International Arbitration and Enforcement in China: Historical Perspectives and Current Trends, 14 CURRENTS: INT'L TRADE L.J. 69, 70 (2005)
33. LOUIS HENKIN, HOW NATIONS BEHAVE: LAW AND FOREIGN POLICY (2d ed. 1979)
34. ANDREW T. GUZMAN, HOW INTERNATIONAL LAW WORKS: A RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY 51-53 (2008)
35. J. Joseph Hewitt, Trends in Global Conflict, 1946-2007, in PEACE AND CONFLICT 2010 27, 27
36. Lotta Harbom et al., Armed Conflict and Peace Agreements, 43 J. PEACE RES. 617, 618 tbl.2 (2006).
37. Rosalyn Higgins, The ICJ, the ECJ, and the Integrity of International Law, 52 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 1, 12 (2003)
38. PATRICIA BIRNIE ET AL., INTERNATIONAL LAW & THE ENVIRONMENT 252-53 (3d ed. 2009)
39. Rules of Procedure, PERM. COURT OF ARBITRATION, http://www.pcacpa.org/ showpage.asp?pag-id=1188 (last visited Oct. 26, 2010)
40. R. P. ANAND, STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL ADJUDICATION (1969)
41. Richard B. Bilder, Some Limitations of Adjudication as an International Dispute Settlement Technique, 23 VA. J. INT'L L. 1, 4 (1982)
42. J. G. Merrills, The Role and Limits of International Adjudication, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM 169, 169-82 (William E. Butler ed., 1987)
43. G. Shinkaretskaya, The Present and Future Role of International Adjudication as a Means for Peacefully Settling Disputes, 29 INDIAN J. INT'L L. 87, 88 (1989)
44. Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hung. v. Slovk.), 1997 I.C.J. 7 (Sept. 25).
45. Salman M.A. Salman, Good Offices and Mediation and International Water Disputes, in RESOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL WATER DISPUTES 155, 162-64.
46. Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Austl.), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, 1992 I.C.J. 240 (June 26)
47. Nuclear Tests (N.Z. v. Fr.), Judgment, 1974 I.C.J. 457 (Dec. 20)
48. Nuclear Tests (N.Z. v. Fr.), Interim Protection Order, 1973 I.C.J. 135 (June 22)
49. Laura Horn, The Role of Mediation in International Environmental Law, 4 AUSTL. DISP. RESOL. J. 16 (1993).
50. TIM STEPHENS, INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 326-31 (2009)
51. Joel P. Trachtman, Institutional Linkage: Transcending "Trade", 96 AM. J. INT'L L. 77, 89-90 (2002)
52. Thomas J. Dillon, Jr., The World Trade Organization: A New Legal Order for World Trade?, 16 MICH. J. INT'L L. 349, 396-97 (1994)
53. GARY C. BRYNER, FROM PROMISES TO PERFORMANCE: ACHIEVING GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS 96-97 (1997)
54. MICHELLE L. BURGIS, BOUNDARIES OF DISCOURSE IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: MAPPING ARGUMENTS IN ARAB TERRITORIAL DISPUTES 19-37 (2009)
55. Pending Cases, INT'L COURT OF JUSTICE, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/ index.php?p1=3&p2=1 (last visited Oct. 26, 2010).
56. CESARE P. R. ROMANO, THE PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTES: A PRAGMATIC APPROACH 46-64 (2000)
57. Christine Chinkin, Alternative Dispute Resolution Under International Law, in REMEDIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE INSTITUTIONAL DILEMMA 123, 124-25 (Malcolm D. Evans ed., 1998)
58. Edward N. Luttwak, Give War A Chance, 78 FOREIGN AFF. 36 (1999)
59. How to become IMI Certified, INT'L MEDIATION INST., http://www. imimediation.org/how-to-become-imi-certified (last visited Oct. 25, 2010)
60. Peacemaking, U.N. DEP'T OF POLITICAL AFFAIRS, www.un.org/depts/dpa/peace. html (last visited Oct. 25, 2010)
61. Saadia Touval, Why the UN Fails, 73 FOREIGN AFF. 44, 46-48 (1994)
62. Greg Mills & Terence McNamee, Mission Improbable: International Interventions, the United Nations, and the Challenge of Conflict Resolution, in CONUNDRUM 57, 57-64
63. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, From Legal Disputes to Conflict Resolution and Human Problem Solving: Legal Dispute Resolution in a Multidisciplinary Context, 54 J. LEGAL EDUC. 7 (2004)
64. Melanie Greenberg, Mediating Massacres: When "Neutral, Low-Power" Models of Mediation Cannot and Should Not Work, 19 OHIO ST. J. DISP. RESOL. 185, 200-05 (2003)
65. JEROME DELLI PRISCOLI & AARON T. WOLF, MANAGING AND TRANSFORMING WATER CONFLICTS 33-49 (2009)
66. E. Franklin Dukes, What We Know About Environmental Conflict Resolution: An Analysis Based on Research, 22 CONFLICT RESOL. Q. 191, 192-93 (2004)
67. Carolyn M. Shaw, Conflict Management in Latin America, in REGIONAL CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 123, 149 (Paul F. Diehl & Joseph Lepgold eds., 2003)
68. Jacob Bercovitch, Introduction: Putting Mediation in Context, in STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL MEDIATION 3, 22 (Jacob Bercovitch ed., 2002)
69. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, The Trouble with the Advisory System in a Postmodern, Multicultural World, 38 WM. & MARY L. REV. 5, 36-38 (1996)
70. William Zartman & Saadia Touval, International Mediation in the Post- Cold War Era, in MANAGING GLOBAL CHAOS 445, 445-61 (Chester A. Crocker et al. eds., 1996)
71. Lon L. Fuller, Mediation-Its Forms and Functions, in ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 115, 117-19 (Michael Freeman ed., 1995)
72. JOAQUIN TACSAN, THE DYNAMICS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION (1992)
73. Charles Kegley & Gregory Raymond, Third Party Mediation and International Norms: A Test of Two Models, 9 CONFLICT MGMT. & PEACE SCI. 33, 37 (1985)
74. SAM KAGEL & KATHY KELLY, THE ANATOMY OF MEDIATION: WHAT MAKES IT WORK 114-15 (1989)
75. Kenneth R. Feinberg, Mediation-A Preferred Method of Dispute Resolution, 16 PEPP. L. REV., S5-S16 (1989)
76. Lawrence Susskind & Eileen Babbitt, Overcoming Obstacles to Effective Mediation of International Disputes, in MEDIATION IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 30, 48 (Jacob Bercovitch & Jeffrey Z. Rubin eds., 1992)
77. Jacob Bercovitch & Scott S. Gartner, Is There Method in the Madness of Mediation? Some Lessons for Mediators from Quantitative Studies of Mediation, 32 INT'L INTERACTIONS 329, 329 (2006).
78. RONGXING GUO, TERRITORIAL DISPUTES AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: A GLOBAL HANDBOOK, 45-47 (2007)
79. S. M. A. Salman, Good Offices and Mediation and International Water Disputes, in RESOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL WATER DISPUTES 155, 183-92, (2003)
80. THOMAS PRINCEN, INTERMEDIARIES IN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT 135-85 (1992)
81. James L. Garrett, The Beagle Channel Dispute: Confrontation and Negotiation in the Southern Cone, J. INTERAMERICAN STUD. & WORLD AFF. 81, 81 (1985)
82. M. C. Mirow, International Law and Religion in Latin America: The Beagle Channel Dispute, 28 SUFFOLK TRANSNAT'L L. REV. 1, 15-27 (2004)
83. GEORGE J. MITCHELL, MAKING PEACE (1999)
84. Daniel Curran & James K. Sebenius, The Mediator as Coalition Builder: George Mitchell in Northern Ireland, 8 INT'L NEGOTIATION 111, 111 (2003)
85. Molly M. Melin & Isak Svensson, Incentives for Talking: Accepting Mediation in International and Civil Wars, 35 INT'L INTERACTIONS 249, 261 (2009)
86. Jacob Bercovitch & Paul F. Diehl, Conflict Management of Enduring Rivalries: The Frequency, Timing and Short-Term Impact of Mediation, 22 INT'L INTERACTIONS 299, 299 (1997)
87. PROJECT ON INTERNATIONAL COURTS & TRIBUNALS, http://www.pict-pcti.org (last visited Oct. 25, 2010)
88. Geir Ulfstein, Institutions and Competences, in THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 45, 67-68 (Jan Klabbers et al. eds., 2009)
89. Cesare P. R. Romano, Deciphering the Grammar of the International Jurisprudential Dialogue, 41 NYUJ. INT'L L. & POL. 755, 755 (2009)
90. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Rep. of the Int'l Law Comm'n, 58th Sess., May 1-June 9, July 3-Aug. 11, 2006,
91. Jonathan I. Charney, Is International Law Threatened by Multiple International Tribunals?, 271 RECUEIL DES COURS 101, 117 (1998)
92. Gerhard Hafner, Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law, 25 MICH. J. INT'L L. 849, 849 (2004)
93. Christian Leathley, An Institutional Hierarchy to Combat the Fragmentation of International Law: Has the ILC Missed an Opportunity?, 40 NYUJ. INT'L L. & POL. 259, 271 (2007)
94. Pierre-Marie Dupuy, The Unity of Application of International Law at the Global Level and the Responsibility of Judges, 1 EUR. J. LEGAL STUD. 1 (2007)
95. Bruno Simma, Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner, 20 EUR. J. INT'L L. 265 (2009)
96. Martti Koskenniemi & Päivi Leino, Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties, 15 LEIDEN J. INT'L L. 553, 553 (2002)
97. Frank E. A. Sander, Varieties of Dispute Processing, in THE POUND CONFERENCE: PERSPECTIVES ON JUSTICE IN THE FUTURE 65 (A. Leo Levin & Russell R. Wheeler eds., 1979)
98. S. JAYAKUMAR & TOMMY KOH, PEDRA BRANCA: THE ROAD TO THE WORLD COURT 35 (2009)
99. Tan Hsien-Li, Case Concerning Sovereignty Over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore), 12 SING. Y.B. INT'L L. & CONTRIBUTORS 257 (2008)
100. Coalter G. Lathrop, International Decisions: Sovereignty Over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge, 102 AM. J. INT'L L. 828 (2008)
101. Li Xueying, Navigating the Rocks Ahead May Be Tricky: But Experts Confident Any Unresolved Issues Will Be Ironed Out, STRAITS TIMES, May 24, 2008, available at http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/general-news/pedra-branca- belongs-to-singapore.html
102. ICJ Awards Pedra Branca's Sovereignty to Singapore, CHANNELNEWSASIA.COM, http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singapore localnews/view/349592/1/.html (last visited Oct. 30, 2010)
103. Nilaratna Xuto, Thailand: Conciliating a Dispute on Tuna Exports to the EC, in MANAGING THE CHALLENGES OF WTO PARTICIPATION: 45 CASE STUDIES 555, 560 (Peter Gallagher et al. eds., 2005), available at www.wto.org/english/res-e/ booksp-e/casestudies-e/case40-e.htm
104. Faizel Ismail, The Role of the Chair in the WTO Negotiations from the Potsdam Collapse in June 2007-June 2008, 43 J. WORLD TRADE 1145, 1149-50 (2009)
105. Nejib Jibril, Note, The Binding Dilemma: From Bakassi to Badme-Making States Comply with Territorial Decisions of International Judicial Bodies, 19 AM. U. INT'L L. REV. 633, 662-67 (2004)
106. Gov't Sudan v. Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (Abyei Arb.), Final Award (Perm. Ct. Arb. 2009), http://www.pcacpa.org/showpage.asp?pag-id= 1306
107. PERMANENT CT. OF ARB. OPTIONAL CONCILIATION RULES, available at http://www.pca-cpa.org/upload/files/CONCENG.pdf
108. PERMANENT CT. OF ARB. OPTIONAL RULES FOR FACT-FINDING COMM'NS OF INQUIRY, available at http://www.pcacpa.org/upload/files/INQENG.pdf
109. Surya P. Subedi, The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism as a New Technique for Settling Disputes in International Law, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT 173, 173 (Duncan French et al. eds., 2010).
110. Nassib G. Ziadé, ICSID Conciliation, 13 NEWS FROM ICSID 3, 5-6
111. Jeffrey Lefebvre, Red Sea Security and the Geopolitical-Economy of the Hanish Islands Dispute, 52 MIDDLE E. J. 367, 373-76 (1998)
112. B.G. Ramcharan, Preventing War between Eritrea and Yemen over the Hanish Islands (1996), in CONFLICT PREVENTION IN PRACTICE: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF JIM SUTTERLIN 157, 157-68 (B.G. Ramcharan ed., 2005)
113. Daniel J. Dzurek, Eritrea-Yemen Dispute over the Hanish Islands, 1996 IBRU BOUNDARY & SEC. BULL. 70, 73-416
114. Red Sea Islands (1995), ICB DATA VIEWER, www.cidcm.umd.edu/icb/dataviewer
115. Eritrea v. Yemen, Award Phase 1, (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1998) http://www.pca-cpa.org/upload/files/EYPhaseI.pdf.
116. Barbara Kwiatkowska, The Eritrea/Yemen Arbitration: Landmark Progress in the Acquisition of Territorial Sovereignty and Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation, 2000 IBRU BOUNDARY & SEC. BULL. 66, 78.
117. Barry C. Bartel, Comment, Med-Arb as a Distinct Method of Dispute Resolution: History, Analysis, and Potential, 27 WILLAMETTE L. REV. 661 (1991)
118. William H. Ross & Donald E. Conlon, Note, Hybrid Forms of Third-Party Dispute Resolution: Theoretical Implications of Combining Mediation and Arbitration, 25 ACAD. MGMT. REV. 416 (2000)
119. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, When Dispute Resolution Begets Disputes of Its Own: Conflicts Among Dispute Professionals, 44 UCLA L. REV. 1871 (1997). (Pubitemid 127445752)
120. JOSÉ ALVAREZ, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AS LAW-MAKERS 424-28 (2005) and UNITED NATIONS COMP. COMM'N, http://www.uncc.ch (last visited Oct. 24, 2010).
121. The Secretariat, UNITED NATIONS COMP. COMM'N http://www.uncc.ch/secretar. htm (last visited Oct. 24, 2010)
122. Rosemary Nagy, Traditional Justice and Legal Pluralism in Transitional Context: The Case of Rwanda's Gacaca Courts, in RECONCILIATION(S): TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN POSTCONFLICT SOCIETIES 86, 86-87 (Joanna R. Quinn ed., 2009)
123. Jennifer S. Easterday, Deciding the Fate of Complementarity: A Colombian Case Study, 26 ARIZ. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 49, 52-53 (2002)
124. Mohamed M. El Zeidy, The Principle of Complementarity: A New Machinery to Implement International Criminal Law, 23 MICH. J. INT'L L. 869 (2002)
125. Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger, Effective Implementation of Intersecting Public International Regimes: Environment, Development and Trade Law, in PUBLIC INTEREST RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: TOWARDS EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION 213 (Teruo Komori & Karel Wellens eds., 2009)
126. Shuichi Furuya, The Principle of Complementarity in Reality: Who Actually Applies It and in What Way under the ICC System?, in PUBLIC INTEREST RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: TOWARDS EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION, 194, 293
127. Campbell McLachlan, The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention, 54 INT'L & COMP. L. Q. 279, 285 (2005)
128. Joost Pauwelyn, Bridging Fragmentation and Unity: International Law as a Universe of Inter- Connected Islands, 25 MICH. J. INT'L L. 903 (2004)
129. ERIC A. POSNER, THE PERILS OF GLOBAL LEGALISM 71-79 (2009)
130. Harold Hongju Koh, Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, 106 YALE L.J. 2599, 2623 (1997)
131. David Zaring, International Institutional Performance in Crisis, 10 CHI. J. INT'L L. 475, 503 (2010)
132. Paul S. Berman, Global Legal Pluralism, 80 S. CAL. L. REV. 1155, 1155-56 (2007)
133. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Roots and Inspirations: A Brief History of the Foundations of Dispute Resolution, in THE HANDBOOK OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION 13, 23 (Michael L. Moffitt & Robert C. Bordone eds., 2005)
134. CATHY A. COSTANTINO & CHRISTINA SICKLES MERCHANT, DESIGNING CONFLICT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 96-116 (1996)
135. WILLIAM URY ET AL., GETTING DISPUTES RESOLVED: DESIGNING SYSTEMS TO CUT THE COSTS OF CONFLICT 41-64 (1988)
136. Chris Carlson, Convening, in THE CONSENSUS BUILDING HANDBOOK 169-97 (Lawrence Susskind et al. eds., 1999)
137. SCHEINMAN INST. ON CONFLICT RESOLUTION, DESIGNING INTEGRATED CONFLICT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: GUIDELINES FOR PRACTITIONERS AND DECISIONMAKERS IN ORGANIZATIONS (2001)
138. Lawrence Susskind & Jennifer Thomas-Larmer, Conducting a Conflict Assessment, in THE CONSENSUS BUILDING HANDBOOK 99, 99-136 (Lawrence Susskind et al. eds., 1999)
139. Kenneth Cloke, Conflict Resolution Systems Design, the United Nations and the New World Order, 8 MEDIATION Q. 343, 344-45 (1991)
140. Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Public and Private International Dispute Resolution, in THE HANDBOOK OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION 438, 450-51 (Michael L. Moffitt & Robert C. Bordone eds., 2005)
141. Amy J. Cohen, Dispute Systems Design, Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Scale, 14 HARV. NEGOT. L. REV. 51, 75-76 (2009)
142. Lawrence Woocher, Preventing Violent Conflict: Assessing Progress, Meeting Challenges, 231 U.S. INST. OF PEACE SPECIAL REP. 5-6 n.21 (2009)
143. Charles T. Call & Elizabeth M. Cousens, Ending Wars and Building Peace: International Responses to War-Torn Societies, 9 INT'L STUD. PERSP. 1, 10-15 (2008)
144. Anne Peters, Dual Democracy, in THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 263, 296-313, 333 (Jan Klabbers et al. eds., 2009)
145. RAFAEL DOMINGO, THE NEW GLOBAL LAW 181-85 (2010)
146. David Held, The Changing Structure of International Law: Sovereignty Transformed?, in THE GLOBAL TRANSFORMATIONS READER: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE GLOBALIZATION DEBATE 162, 162-64 (David Held & Anthony McGrew eds., 2d ed. 2003)
147. James Crawford & Susan Marks, The Global Democracy Deficit: An Essay in International Law and its Limits, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AS AN OPEN SYSTEM: SELECTED ESSAYS, 5, 137-38
148. IAN BROWNLIE, PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 65-67 (7th ed. 2008)
149. David Held, The Changing Structure of International Law: Sovereignty Transformed?, in THE GLOBAL TRANSFORMATIONS READER: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE GLOBALIZATION DEBATE, 224, 162-63
150. Thomas Baldwin, The Territorial State, in JURISPRUDENCE: CAMBRIDGE ESSAYS 207, 224-25 (Hyman Gross & Ross Harrison eds., 1992)
151. Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, 1949 I.C.J. 174, 178-187 (Apr. 11)
152. ALEX MILLS, THE CONFLUENCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 26-28 (2009)
153. STEPHEN BELL & ANDREW HINDMOOR, RETHINKING GOVERNANCE: THE CENTRALITY OF THE STATE IN MODERN SOCIETY (2009)
154. Teruo Komori, Introduction to PUBLIC INTEREST RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: TOWARDS EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION 1, 1 (Teruo Komori & Karel Wellens eds., 2009)
155. Robert O. Keohane, The Demand for International Regimes, in INTERNATIONAL REGIMES 141 (Stephen D. Krasner ed., 1983)
156. Jose E. Alvarez, Contemporary International Law: An 'Empire of Law' or the 'Law of Empire'?, 24 AM. U. INT'L L. REV. 811, 836 (2009)
157. Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger, The Role of International Forums in the Advancement of Sustainable Development, 10 SUSTAINABLE DEV. L. & POL'Y 4 (2009)
158. PHILIPPE SANDS, LAWLESS WORLD: AMERICA AND THE MAKING AND BREAKING OF GLOBAL RULES (2005)
159. Pierre-Marie Dupuy, Some Reflections on Contemporary International Law and the Appeal to Universal Values: A Response to Martti Koskenniemi, 16 EUR. J. INT'L L. 131 (2005)
160. Rudiger Wolfrum, Solidarity Amongst States: An Emerging Structural Principle of International Law, 49 INDIAN J. INT'L L. 8 (2009).
161. Samantha Besson, The Authority of International Law-Lifting the State Veil, 31 SYDNEY L. REV. 343 (2009)