Comparative life cycle assessment of improved and conventional cultivation practices for energy crops in Japan

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 36, Issue , 2012, Pages 302-315

  Uchida, Susumu ^a   Hayashi, Kiyotada ^a  

^a FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Crop breeding; Cultivation practice; Energy crop; Life cycle assessment

Indexed keywords

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; COMPARATIVE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; CROP CULTIVATION; DIRECT-SEEDING; ENERGY CROPS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; THIRD GENERATION; YIELD INCREASE;

BIOETHANOL; COMPOSTING; CROPS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ETHANOL; FOOD SUPPLY; RATING;

LIFE CYCLE;

BIOFUEL; CULTIVATION; ENERGY CROP; FOOD SUPPLY; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PLANT BREEDING;

JAPAN;

EID: 84355162016     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.043     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Japanese Cabinet Biomass nippon strategy [Internet] 2006, [cited 2011 Feb 15]. Available from:. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/biomass/pdf/h18_senryaku.pdf.
2. Gelfand I., Snapp S.S., Robertson G.P. Energy efficiency of conventional, organic, and alternative cropping systems for food and fuel at a site in the US midwest. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:4006-4011.
3. Su C.L., Lee Y.M. Development status and life cycle inventory analysis of biofuels in Taiwan. Energ Policy 2009, 37:754-758.
4. Renouf M.A., Wegener M.K., Nielsen L.K. An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. Biomass Bioenerg 2008, 32:1144-1155.
5. Brehmer B., Sanders J. Methodology description behind implementing an energetic and exergetic cradle-to-gate analysis for valorizing the optimal utilization of biomass. Int J Green Energ 2009, 6:268-286.
6. Nasidi M., Akunna J., Deeni Y., Blackwood D., Walker G. Bioethanol in Nigeria: comparative analysis of sugarcane and sweet sorghum as feedstock sources. Energ Environ Sci 2010, 3:1447-1457.
7. Wortmann C.S., Liska A.J., Ferguson R.B., Lyon D.J., Klein R.N., Dweikat I. Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska. Agron J 2010, 102:319-326.
8. Food and Agriculture Organization The state of food and agriculture 2008, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
9. Doornbosch R., Steenblik R. Biofuels: is the cure worse than the disease? Document prepared for the round table on sustainable development at organisation for economic co-operation and development [Internet] 2007, [cited 2011 Feb 15]. Available from:, Round Table on Sustainable Development, OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/46/39348696.pdf.
10. Zah R., Böni H., Gauch M., Hischier R., Lehmann M., Wäger P. ökobilanz von energieprodukten: ökologische bewertung von biotreibstoffen 2007, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St Gallen, [German].
11. Fargione J., Hill J., Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 2008, 319:1235-1238.
12. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008, 319:1238-1240.
13. Gomiero T., Paoletti M.G., Pimentel D. Biofuels: efficiency, ethics, and limits to human appropriation of ecosystem services. J Agric Environ Ethics 2010, 23:403-434.
14. Börjesson P. Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective-what determines this?. Appl Energ 2009, 86:589-594.
15. Buchholz T., Luzadis V.A., Volk T.A. Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey. J Clean Prod 2009, 17:S86-S98.
16. Delucchi M.A. Impacts of biofuels on climate change, water use, and land use. Year Ecol Conservation Biol 2010, 2010:28-45.
17. Gutterson N., Zhang J. Important issues and current status of bioenergy crop policy for advanced biofuels. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2009, 3:441-447.
18. Mathews J.A. From the petroeconomy to the bioeconomy: integrating bioenergy production with agricultural demands. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2009, 3:613-632.
19. Ometto A.R., Hauschild M.Z., Roma W.N.L. Lifecycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2009, 14:236-247.
20. Volpi G. Biofuels in Brazil and land use change. J Biobased Mater Bioenerg 2010, 4:211-220.
21. Kim S., Dale B.E. Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass Bioenerg 2005, 29:426-439.
22. Adviento-Borbe M.A.A., Haddix M.L., Binder D.L., Walters D.T., Dobermann A. Soil greenhouse gas fluxes and global warming potential in four high-yielding maize systems. Glob Change Biol 2007, 13:1972-1988.
23. Sriroth K., Piyachomkwan K., Wanlapatit S., Nivitchanyong S. The promise of a technology revolution in cassava bioethanol: from Thai practice to the world practice. Fuel 2010, 89:1333-1338.
24. Larson E.D. A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energ Sustain Dev 2006, 10:109-126.
25. United Nations Environment Programme Towards sustainable production and use of resources: assessing biofuels 2009, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
26. Whitaker J., Ludley K.E., Rowe R., Taylor G., Howard D.C. Sources of variability in greenhouse gas and energy balances for biofuel production: a systematic review. Glob Change Biol Bioenerg 2010, 2:99-112.
27. Kim S., Dale B.E. Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States-corn-based ethanol and soybean oil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2009, 14:540-546.
28. 2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first-generation biofuels. Glob Change Biol 2009, 15:1-23.
29. 2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys 2008, 8:389-395.
30. von Blottnitz H., Curran M.A. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 2007, 15:607-619.
31. Jacobson M. Effects of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline vehicles on cancer and mortality in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 4150-4157.
32. Naidenko O.V. Ethanol-gasoline fuel blends may cause human health risks and engine issues [Internet] 2009, [cited 2011 Feb 15]. Available from:, Environmental Working Group, Washington. http://www.ewg.org/files/2009/ethanol-gasoline-white-paper.pdf.
33. Hayashi K, Uchida S, Hokazono S, Sato M. Modeling life cycle inventories for crop production in Japan: development of the NARO LCI database. LCA Food 2010: VII International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector. Bari, Italy; 2010, p. 455-460.
34. Macedo Id C. Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in the production and use of fuel ethanol in Brazil [Internet] 2004, Available from:, Government of the State of São Paulo, São Paulo. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/brazil.unicamp.macedo.greenhousegas.pdf.
35. Uchida S, Hayashi K, Gau M, Kajiyama T, Shirasawa S, Takahashi H, et al. Life cycle assessment of energy crop production with special attention to the establishment of regional biomass utilization systems. Int J Sust Dev; in press.
36. Koga N., Takahashi H., Okazaki K., Kajiyama T., Kobayashi S. Potential agronomic options for energy-efficient sugar beet-based bioethanol production in northern Japan. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 2009, 1:220-229.
37. Taguchi K., Okazaki K., Abe H., Takahashi H. Top cross analysis to the inheritance of Rhizoctonia root rot and crown rot in sugar beet F1 lines. Nihon Ikusyu Gakkai Nihon Sakumotsu Gakkai Hokkaido Danwakai Kaiho 2008, 49:113-114. [Japanese].
38. Okazaki K., Takahashi H., Taguchi K. The change of productivity for crown and root in F1 hybrid sugar beet. Nihon Ikusyu Gakkai Nihon Sakumotsu Gakkai Hokkaido Danwakai Kaiho 2008, 48:117-118. [Japanese].
39. Koga N., Kajiyama T., Senda K., Ikegaya S., Tamiya S., Tsuda S. Bareisho wo genryo to suru bioethanol seisan no kanousei: energy kouritsu kara mita bareisho saibai gijutsu no saitekika. Norinsuisansho itaku project kenkyu "Chiiki kasseika no tameno biomass riyou gijutsu no kaihatsu" Kenkyu seika happyokai kouen youshi: chiiki no biomass wo tsukaitsukusu 2010, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tokyo, p. III-2. Japanese.
40. Ohnami M., Matsunaga H., Suzuki T. Productivity of easy-ridging cultivation in potato. Nihon Ikusyu Gakkai Nihon Sakumotsu Gakkai Hokkaido Danwakai Kaiho 2008, 49:75-76. [Japanese].
41. Ebe S., Ikegaya S., Senda K., Fujita R., Ohnami M., Iritani M., et al. A new medium-late maturing potato variety "Hokuiku no. 13" with good starch quality and resistance to potato cyst nematodes. Atarashii Kenkyu Seika 2009, 51-54. [Japanese].
42. Tamiya S. Tei-cost de saibai dekiru byochugai teikosei kyokutashu bareisho keitou no ikusei. Norinsuisansho itaku project kenkyu "Chiiki kasseika no tameno biomass riyou gijutsu no kaihatsu" Kenkyu seika happyokai kouen youshi: chiiki no biomass wo tsukaitsukusu 2010, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tokyo, p. I-4. Japanese.
43. Higashi M., Suzaki T., Iwami T., Obata H. Selection of superior sorghum strain of sorgo type. Bull Miyazaki Livest Exp 2007, 20:28-34. [Japanese].
44. Kato N., Kubota T., Hattori I., Sato K. Minimum tillage cultivation and harvesting of forage crops. Jpn J Crop Sci 2008, 77:352-353. [Japanese].
45. Yoshihira T., Moriyama A., Kosaka S., Takai T., Goto K., Kiyosawa A. Growth analysis in high dry matter yielding sorgum cultivars in central Hokkaido: comparison with corn for silage. Nihon Ikusyu Gakkai Nihon Sakumotsu Gakkai Hokkaido Danwakai Kaiho 2007, 48:53-54. [Japanese].
46. Tsuru M., Momoze Y., Takai T., Nakayama T., Watanabe H. Fermentative quality of round bale silage made from densely planted forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench) using a flail-type harvester. J Jpn Soc Grassland Sci 2007, 53:11-15. [Japanese].
47. Ishii T., Adachi K., Omine M., Kobayashi T. Kokusan baio nenryo ni muketa genryo seisan no tameno ogata-une, tajo-ue ni yoru atarashii kansho tyokuha saibai gijutsu. Norinsuisansho itaku project kenkyu "Chiiki kasseika no tameno biomass riyou gijutsu no kaihatsu" Kenkyu seika happyokai kouen youshi: chiiki no biomass wo tsukaitsukusu 2010, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tokyo, p. I-8. Japanese.
48. Kumagai T., Yamakawa O., Yoshinaga M., Ishiguro K., Hidaka M., Kai Y. "Konahomare": a new sweetpotato cultivar for starch production. Bull Natl Agric Res Cent Kyushu Okinawa Region 2002, 40:1-16. [Japanese].
49. Terajima Y, Terauchi T, Sakaigaichi T, Hattori T, Fujisaki A, Teruya H, et al. Productivities of a large biomass sugarcane line "KY01-2044" in Nansei islands. The 229th Meeting of the Crop Science Society of Japan. Utsunomiya: Crop Sci Soc Jpn; 2010, p. 124-125. [Japanese].
50. Fujisaki A., Terajima Y., Sonoda J., Nishi H., Shirasawa S. Productivity and quality evaluation of the sugarcane line for biomass ethanol production at Amami region. Rep Kyushu Branch Crop Sci Soc Jpn 2010, 76:37-40. [Japanese].
51. Maeda M. Introduction to simulation models of nitrogen dynamics in upland fields. Nihon Dojo Hiryogaku Zasshi 2008, 79:89-99.
52. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office National greenhouse gas inventory report of JAPAN 2008, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba.
53. Sutter J. Sweet sorghum, production in China. Life cycle inventories of bioenergy 2007, 162-175. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories. N. Jungbluth (Ed.).
54. Jungbluth N. Erdöl. Sachbilanzen von energiesystemen 2007, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.
55. Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry [Internet] 2010, [updated 2010 Jul 1; cited 2011 Feb 10]. Available from:, Life cycle assessment society of Japan, Tokyo. http://www.jemai.or.jp/lcaforum/db/01_06.cfm.
56. Sutter J. Oil palm, production in Malaysia. Life cycle inventories of bioenergy 2007, 84-95. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories. N. Jungbluth (Ed.).
57. Primas A. Phosphate rock. Life cycle inventories of chemicals 2007, 508-529. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories. H.-J. Althaus, R. Hischier, M. Osses (Eds.).
58. Hattori T., Morita S. Energy crops for sustainable bioethanol production; which, where and how?. Plant Prod Sci 2010, 13:221-234.
59. ADEME. Life cycle assessments applied to first generation biofuels used in France [Internet]. Angers; 2010 [cited 2011 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.planetegagnante.fr/servlet/getBin%3Fname%3D6E6BE6CEBC440ABE7877CDC4791E5B741276178592484.pdf.
60. Koga N. An energy balance under a conventional crop rotation system in northern Japan: perspectives on fuel ethanol production from sugar beet. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2008, 125:101-110.
61. Börjesson P.I.I. Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation. Biomass Bioenerg 1996, 11:305-318.
62. Worley J.W., Vaughan D.H., Cundiff J.S. Energy analysis of ethanol production from sweet sorghum. Bioresour Technol 1992, 40:263-273.
63. Monti A., Venturi G. Comparison of the energy performance of fibre sorghum, sweet sorghum and wheat monocultures in northern Italy. Eur J Agron 2003, 19:35-43.
64. Macedo I.C., Leal M.R.L.V., Silva J.E.A.R. Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in the production and use of fuel ethanol in Brazil 2004, Government of the State of São Paulo.
65. CONCAWE, EUCAR, JRC Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context. Well-to-tank report [Internet] 2006, [cited 2011 Feb 15]., Available from:. http://www.co2star.eu/publications/Well_to_Tank_Report_EU.pdf.
66. ADEME/DIREM. Bilans énergétiques et gaz à effet de serre des filières de production de biocarburants. Report according to Ecobilan-Pricewaterhouse Coopers work [Internet]. Angers; 2002 [cited 2011 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.ademe.fr/partenaires/agrice/publications/documents_francais/synthese_bilans_energetiques_fr.pdf.