BMI and gender do not influence surgical accuracy during minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

HIP International

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 688-693

  von Roth, Philipp ^a   Olivier, Markus ^b   Preininger, Bernd ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a   Hube, Robert ^b  

^a Berlin Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies   (Germany)

^b OCM Clinic Munich   (Germany)

Author keywords

Body mass index; Gender; Minimally invasive; Radiological evaluation; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COXITIS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GENDER; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMPLANT POSITIONING; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTTRAUMATIC ARTHROPATHY; PROSTHESIOLOGY; PSYCHOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BODY MASS INDEX; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 84255179078     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8861     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rottinger H. Minimally invasive anterolateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: early clinical results. Hip Int 2006; 16 (suppl 4): 42-7
2. Rottinger H. Minimally invasive anterolateral approach for total hip replacement (OCM technique). Oper Orthop Traumatol 2010; 22: 421-30
3. Müller M, Tohtz S, Dewey M, Springer I, Perka C. Evidence of Reduced Muscle Trauma Through a Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Approach by Means of MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 3192-200
4. Müller M, Tohtz S, Winkler T, Dewey M, Springer I, Perka C. MRI findings of gluteus minimus muscle damage in primary total hip arthroplasty and the influence on clinical outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130: 927-35
5. Müller M, Tohtz S, Springer I, Dewey M, Perka C. Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 179-89
6. Müller M, Dewey M, Springer I, Perka C, Tohtz S. Relationship between cup position and obturator externus muscle in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2010; 5: 44.
7. Matziolis D, Wassilew G, Strube P, Matziolis G, Perka C. Differences in muscle trauma quantifiable in the laboratory between the minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131: 651-5
8. Bernasek TL, Lee WS, Lee HJ, Lee JS, Kim KH, Yang JJ. Minimally invasive primary THA: anterolateral intermuscular approach versus lateral transmuscular approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130:1349-54
9. Heller MO, Kassi JP, Perka C, Duda GN. Cementless stem fixation and primary stability under physiological-like loads in vitro. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2005; 50: 394-9
10. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Kassi JP, Claes L, Haas NP, Duda GN. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 2005; 38: 1155-63
11. Tohtz SW, Heller MO, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN. [On the biomechanics of the hip: relevance of femoral anteversion for hip contact force and loading using a short-stemmed prostheses]. Orthopade 2008; 37: 923-9
12. Oinuma K, Eingartner C, Saito Y, Shiratsuchi H. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 310-26
13. Schidlo C, Becker C, Jansson V, Refior J. [Change in the CCD angle and the femoral anteversion angle by hip prosthesis implantation]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1999; 137: 259-64
14. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 2235-46
15. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 530-4
16. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 701-10
17. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 1353-8
18. Rachbauer F, Krismer M. [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2008; 20: 239-51
19. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Accadbled F, Molinier F, Tricoire JL, Puget J. Learning curve for a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach in primary total hip replacement: analysis of complications and early results versus the standard-incision posterior approach. Acta Orthop Belg 2006; 72: 693-701
20. Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Thomsen M. A ten-to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 209-14
21. Szendroi M, Sztrinkai G, Vass R, Kiss JC. The impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty on the standard procedure. Int Orthop 2006; 30: 167-71
22. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 417: 232-41.