Hemodynamic Evaluation and Midterm Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With Size 19 Perimount Prosthetic Valve

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1799-1803

  Narayan, Pradeep ^a   Reeves, Barnaby C ^a   Rizvi, Syad I A ^a   Shokrollahi, Kayvan ^a   Ismail, Huda ^a   Angelini, Gianni D ^a   Nightingale, Angus ^a   Caputo, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOBUTAMINE;

AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA INDEX; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATIENT PROSTHESIS MISMATCH; PEAK TRANSPROSTHETIC GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REST; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; SURVIVAL TIME; THERAPEUTIC ERROR; TRANSVALVULAR GRADIENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; COHORT STUDIES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 56049093020     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sakamoto Y., Hashimoto K., Okuyama H., et al. Prevalence and avoidance of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement in small adults. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 1305-1309
2. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
3. Pibarot P., and Dumesnil. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact and prevention. Heart 92 (2006) 1022-1029
4. Izzat M.B., Kadir I., Reeves B., Wilde P., Bryan A.J., and Angelini G.D. Patient prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small size aortic valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 68 (1999) 1657-1660
5. Yoganathan A.P., Woo Y.R., Sung H.W., Williams F.P., Franch R.H., and Jones M. In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 92 (1986) 198-209
6. Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Keithahn A., et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 (2005) 1056-1063
7. Kulik A., Al-Saigh M., Chan V., et al. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit?. Ann Thorac Surg 85 (2008) 94-101
8. Desai N.D., and Christakis G.T. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: stented pericardial and porcine valves. In: Cohn L.H. (Ed). Cardiac surgery in the adult. 3rd edition (2007), McGraw-Hill, New York 857-894
9. Kadir I., Walsh C., Wilde P., Bryan A.J., and Angelini G.D. Comparison of exercise and dobutamine echocardiography in the haemodynamic assessment of small size mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21 (2002) 692-697
10. Khan S.S., Siegel R.J., DeRobertis M.A., et al. Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 69 (2000) 531-535
11. Cosgrove D.M., Lytle B.W., Gill C.C., et al. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 89 (1985) 358-368
12. Rao V., Jamieson W.R.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 19 Suppl 3 (2000) III5-III9
13. Tasca G., Mhagna Z., Perotti S., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 113 (2006) 570-576
14. Medalion B., Blackstone E.H., Lytle B.W., White J Arnold J.H., and Cosgrove D.M. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119 (2000) 963-974
15. Hanayama N., Christakis G.T., Mallidi H.R., et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002) 1822-1829
16. Sommers K.E., and David T.E. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 63 (1997) 1608-1612
17. Botzenhardt F., Eichinger W.B., Bleiziffer S., et al. Haemodynamic comparison of bioprosthesis for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic root annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005) 2054-2060
18. Carrier M., Pellerin M., Perrault L.P., et al. Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 71 (2001) 249-252