Nature of sperm-head vacuoles and results and indications of IMSI (intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection);De la nature des vacuoles spermatiques aux résultats et indications de l'IMSI (intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection)

Andrologie

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 234-239

  Boitrelle, F ^a,b   Ferfouri, F ^a,b   Salama, S ^a   Bergere, M ^a,b   Bailly, M ^a   Wainer, B ^a   Vialard, F ^a,b   Selva, J ^a,b   Albert, M ^a,b  

^a et service de gynécologie obstétrique CHIPS Poissy   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

IMSI; Indications and results; MSOME; Sperm vacuole

Indexed keywords

EID: 84155195172     PISSN: 11662654     EISSN: 17605377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12610-011-0147-y     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Gilbert SF (2007) La structure des gamètes. In: De Boeck (ed) Biologie du développement. 2e édition, Paris, chapitre 7.
2. World Health Organization (2011) Reproductive health indicators for global monitoring: report of the second interagency meeting, Geneva. World Health Organization.
3. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, et al (1992) Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340: 17-18.
4. Loutradi KE, Tarlatzis BC, Goulis DG, et al (2006) The effects of sperm quality on embryo development after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet 23: 69-74.
5. De Vos A, van de Velde H, Joris H, et al (2003) Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 79: 42-48.
6. Hotaling JM, Smith JF, Rosen M, et al (2011) The relationship between isolated teratozoospermia and clinical pregnancy after in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 95: 1141-1145.
7. Boitrelle F, Marchetti P, Mitchell V, et al (2011) Explorations fonctionnelles spécialisées du sperme et AMP. In: Poncelet C, Sifer C (eds) Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l'humain. Springer, Paris, chapitre 30.
8. Fischbein A, Zabludovsky N, Eltes F, et al (1997) Ultramorphological sperm characteristics in the risk assessment of health effects after radiation exposure among salvage workers in Chernobyl. Environ Health Perspect 105: 1445-1449.
9. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F (2001) Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. N Engl J Med 345: 1067-1068.
10. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, et al (2002) Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl 23: 1-8.
11. Sermondade N, Sifer C (2011) Motile sperm organelle morphology examination: Toward a consensus? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39: 309-314.
12. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, et al (2005) The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod 20: 185-190.
13. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Ellenbogen A, et al (2006) Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod 21: 1787-1790.
14. Vanderzwalmen P, Hiemer A, Rubner P, et al (2008) Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online 17: 617-627.
15. Cassuto NG, Bouret D, Plouchart JM, et al (2009) A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality. Fertil Steril 92: 1616-1625.
16. Peer S, Eltes F, Berkovitz A, et al (2007) Is fine morphology of the human sperm nuclei affected by in vitro incubation at 37 °C? Fertil Steril 88: 1589-1594.
17. Franco JG, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, et al (2008) Significance of large nuclear vacuoles in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 17: 42-45.
18. Franco Jr JG, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, et al (2011) Large nuclear vacuoles are indicative of abnormal chromatin packaging in human spermatozoa. Int J Androl (sous presse).
19. Garolla A, Fortini D, Menegazzo M, et al (2008) High-power microscopy for selecting spermatozoa for ICSI by physiological status. Reprod Biomed Online 17: 610-616.
20. Travers A, Perdrix A, Legrand F, et al (2009) Les larges vacuoles des têtes spermatiques sont-elles associées à des altérations du noyau ou de l'acrosome du spermatozoïde? Andrologie 20: 247-256.
21. Perdrix A, Travers A, Chelli MH, et al (2011) Assessment of acrosome and nuclear abnormalities in human spermatozoa with large vacuoles. Hum Reprod 26: 47-58.
22. Boitrelle F, Ferfouri F, Petit JM, et al (2011) Large human sperm vacuoles observed in motile spermatozoa under high magnification: nuclear thumbprints linked to failure of chromatin condensation. Hum Reprod 26: 1650-1658.
23. Watanabe S, Tanaka A, Fujii S, et al (2011) An investigation of the potential effect of vacuoles in human sperm on DNA damage using a chromosome assay and the TUNEL assay. Hum Reprod 26: 978-986.
24. Kacem O, Sifer C, Barraud-Lange V, et al (2010) Sperm nuclear vacuoles, as assessed by motile sperm organellar morphological examination, are mostly of acrosomal origin. Reprod Biomed Online 20: 132-137.
25. Zamboni L, Zemjanis R, Stefanini M (1971) The fine structure of monkey and human spermatozoa. Anat Rec 169: 129-153.
26. Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, et al (2009) Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460: 473-478.
27. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, et al (2003) Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 80: 1413-1419.
28. Hazout A, Dumont-Hassan M, Junca AM, et al (2006) Highmagnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 12: 19-25.
29. Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, et al (2008) Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed online 16: 835-841.
30. Nadalini M, Tarozzi N, Distratis V, et al (2009) Impact of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection on assisted reproduction outcome: a review. Reprod Biomed Online 19: 45-55.
31. Souza Setti A, Ferreira RC, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga D, et al (2010) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection outcome: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 21: 450-455.
32. Junca AM, Cohen-Bacrie P, Belloc S, et al (2009) Teratozoospermia at the time of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 37: 552-557.
33. Dumont M, Junca AM, Belloc S, et al (2011) L'utilisation du MSOME: Expérience de six ans. Andrologie 21: 83-89.
34. Balaban B, Yakin K, Alatas C, et al (2011) Clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa morphologically selected under high magnification: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online (sous presse).
35. Wilding M, Coppola G, di Matteo L, et al (2011) Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 28: 253-62.
36. Hammoud I, Albert M, Bergere M, et al (2009) Can IMSI (× 6 000) be more efficient than classical ICSI selecting spermatozoa without nuclear fragmentation? Abstracts du 25e Congrès de l'ESHRE, Amsterdam.
37. Ai L, Liu SY, Huang J, et al (2010) Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection of testicular sperm: clinical outcome in azoospermia patients. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 16: 826-829.
38. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Paul M, et al (2007) The chance of having a healthy normal child following intracytoplasmic morphologicallyselected sperm injection (IMSI) treatment is higher compared to conventional IVF-ICSI treatment. Fertil Steril 88: 20.
39. Vanderzwalmen P, Fallet C (2010) IMSI: indications, results and reflexions. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 39: 22-25.