Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction technique in tonsillar cancer delineation

Practical Radiation Oncology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 27-34

  Abelson, Jonathan A ^a   Murphy, James D ^a   Wiegner, Ellen A ^a   Abelson, Deborah ^b   Sandman, David N ^c   Boas, F Edward ^b   Hristov, Dimitre ^a   Fleischmann, Dominik ^b   Daly, Megan E ^a   Chang, Daniel T ^a   Loo, Billy W ^a   Hara, Wendy ^a   Le, Quynh Thu ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; METAL ARTIFACT REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIMULATION; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TONSIL CANCER;

EID: 84155167810     PISSN: 18798500     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baek CH, Chung MK, Son YI, et al. Tumor volume assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with oral cavity cancer with dental artifacts on CT or MR images. J Nucl Med 2008, 49:1422-1428.
2. Heron DE, Andrade RS, Flickinger J, et al. Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-and-neck cancers: a brief technical report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 60:1419-1424.
3. Boas FE, Fleischmann D Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology 2011, 259:894-902.
4. Golden C, Mazin SR, Boas FE, et al. A comparison of four algorithms for metal artifact reduction in CT imaging 2011, [Abstract].
5. La TH, Filion EJ, Turnbull BB, et al. Metabolic tumor volume predicts for recurrence and death in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 74:1335-1341.
6. Kamel EM, Burger C, Buck A, von Schulthess GK, Goerres GW Impact of metallic dental implants on CT-based attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT scanner. Eur Radiol 2003, 13:724-728.
7. Koshy M, Paulino AC, Howell R, Schuster D, Halkar R, Davis LW F-18 FDG PET-CT fusion in radiotherapy treatment planning for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2005, 27:494-502.
8. Paulino AC, Koshy M, Howell R, Schuster D, Davis LW Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61:1385-1392.
9. Geets X, Daisne JF, Tomsej M, Duprez T, Lonneux M, GrÉgoire V Impact of the type of imaging modality on target volumes delineation and dose distribution in pharyngo-laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison between pre- and per-treatment studies. Radiother Oncol 2006, 78:291-297.
10. Soto DE, Kessler ML, Piert M, Eisbruch A Correlation between pretreatment FDG-PET biological target volume and anatomical location of failure after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Radiother Oncol 2008, 89:13-18.
11. Daisne JF, Duprez T, Weynand B, et al. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology 2004, 233:93-100.
12. Deantonio L, Beldi D, Gambaro G, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and radiotherapy treatment planning of head and neck carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2008, 3:29.
13. Schwartz DL, Ford EC, Rajendran J, et al. FDG-PET/CT-guided intensity modulated head and neck radiotherapy: a pilot investigation. Head Neck 2005, 27:478-487.
14. Wang D, Schultz CJ, Jursinic PA, et al. Initial experience of FDG-PET/CT guided IMRT of head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 65:143-151.
15. Gré;goire V, Haustermans K, Geets X, Roels S, Lonneux M PET-based treatment planning in radiotherapy: a new standard?. J Nucl Med 2007, 48(Suppl 1):68S-77S.
16. Al-Ibraheem A, Buck A, Krause BJ, Scheidhauer K, Schwaiger M Clinical applications of FDG PET and PET/CT in head and neck cancer. J Oncol 2009, 2009:208725.
17. Riegel AC, Berson AM, Destian S, et al. Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 65:726-732.
18. Moule RN, Kayani I, Moinuddin SA, et al. The potential advantages of (18)FDG PET/CT-based target volume delineation in radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2010, 97:189-193.
19. Schinagl DA, Hoffmann AL, Vogel WV, et al. Can FDG-PET assist in radiotherapy target volume definition of metastatic lymph nodes in head-and-neck cancer?. Radiother Oncol 2009, 91:95-100.
20. Schinagl DA, Vogel WV, Hoffmann AL, van Dalen JA, Oyen WJ, Kaanders JH Comparison of five segmentation tools for 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography-based target volume definition in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 69:1282-1289.
21. Ketting CH, Austin-Seymour M, Kalet I, Unger J, Hummel S, Jacky J Consistency of three-dimensional planning target volumes across physicians and institutions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 37:445-453.
22. Hermans R, Feron M, Bellon E, Dupont P, Van den Bogaert W, Baert AL Laryngeal tumor volume measurements determined with CT: a study on intra- and interobserver variability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 40:553-557.
23. Geets X, Daisne JF, Arcangeli S, et al. Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI. Radiother Oncol 2005, 77:25-31.
24. Rothschild S, Studer G, Seifert B, et al. PET/CT staging followed by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) improves treatment outcome of locally advanced pharyngeal carcinoma: a matched-pair comparison. Radiat Oncol 2007, 2:22.