Comparisons of the outcome prediction performance of injury severity scoring tools using the abbreviated injury scale 90 update 98 (AIS 98) and 2005 update 2008 (AIS 2008)

Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine

Volumn 55, Issue , 2011, Pages 255-265

  Tohira, Hideo ^a   Jacobs, Ian ^a   Mountain, David ^a   Gibson, Nick ^a   Yeo, Allen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

10-FOLD CROSS-VALIDATION; ABBREVIATED INJURY SCALE; DATA SETS; INJURY SEVERITY; OUTCOME PREDICTION; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; TRAUMA PATIENTS;

MEDICINE;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; HUMAN; INJURY; INJURY SCALE; PROGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

ABBREVIATED INJURY SCALE; AREA UNDER CURVE; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; PROGNOSIS; ROC CURVE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84055184802     PISSN: 19432461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. AAAM: Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 update 2008. Barrington Illinois: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 2008.
2. AMA: Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale. JAMA 215:277-280, 1971.
3. Aydin SA, Bulut M, Ozguc H, et al.: Should the New Injury Severity Score replace the Injury Severity Score in the Trauma and Injury Severity Score? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 14:308-312, 2008.
4. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W, Jr., et al.: The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187-196, 1974.
5. Balogh Z, Offner PJ, Moore EE, et al.: NISS predicts postinjury multiple organ failure better than the ISS. J Trauma 48:624-627, 2000.
6. Barnes J, Hassan A, Cuerden R, et al.: Comparison of injury severity between AIS 2005 and AIS 1990 in a large injury database. Annual proceedings/Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine 53:83-89, 2009.
7. Bengio Y and Grandvalet Y: No unbiased estimator of the variance of k-fold cross-validation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 5:1089-1105, 2004.
8. Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Belcaid A, et al.: Should patients with isolated hip fractures be included in trauma registries? J Trauma 58:793-797, 2005. (Pubitemid 40592751)
9. Boyd CR, Toison MA and Copes WS: Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 27:370-378, 1987.
10. Cameron PA and Palmer C: Developing consensus on injury coding. Injury 42:10-11, 2011.
11. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, et al.: A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma 29:623-629, 1989. (Pubitemid 19156497)
12. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al.: A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma 30:539-545, 1990a.
13. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al.: The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma 30:1356-1365, 1990b.
14. Champion HR, Sacco WJ and Copes WS: Injury Severity Scoring Again. J Trauma 38:94-95, 1995.
15. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al.: Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation. J Trauma 40:42-48, 1996. (Pubitemid 126424991)
16. Clark DE, DeLorenzo MA, Lucas FL, et al.: Epidemiology and short-term outcomes of injured medicare patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:2023-2030, 2004. (Pubitemid 41725018)
17. Dillon B, Wang W and Bouamra O: A comparison study of the injury score models. European Journal of Trauma 32:538-547, 2006. (Pubitemid 46178338)
18. DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Holly C, et al.: An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area. J Trauma 49:212-220, 2000.
19. Frankema SP, Edwards MJR, Steyerberg EW, et al.: Predicting survival after trauma: A comparison of TRISS and ASCOT in the Netherlands. European Journal of Trauma 28:355-364, 2002. (Pubitemid 36014782)
20. Frankema SP, Steyerberg EW, Edwards MJR, et al.: Comparison of current injury scales for survival chance estimation: an evaluation comparing the predictive performance of the ISS, NISS, and AP scores in a Dutch local trauma registration. J Trauma 58:596-604, 2005. (Pubitemid 40365823)
21. Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Wolfe R, et al.: TRISS: does it get better than this? Academic emergency medicine 11:181-186, 2004. (Pubitemid 38166972)
22. Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Wolfe R, et al.: Predictors of mortality, length of stay and discharge destination in blunt trauma. ANZ J Surg 75:650-656, 2005. (Pubitemid 41648193)
23. Garber BG, Hebert PC, Wells G, et al.: Validation of trauma and injury severity score in blunt trauma patients by using a Canadian trauma registry. J Trauma 40:733-737, 1996. (Pubitemid 26142754)
24. Gomez D, Xiong W, Haas B, et al.: The Missing Dead: The Problem of Case Ascertainment in the Assessment of Trauma Center Performance. J Trauma 66:1218-1225, 2009.
25. Hanley JA and McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29-36, 1982. (Pubitemid 12142173)
26. Hanley JA and McNeil BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843, 1983. (Pubitemid 13033817)
27. Hannan EL, Mendeloff J, Farrell LS, et al.: Validation of TRISS and ASCOT using a non-MTOS trauma registry. J Trauma 38:83-88, 1995.
28. Hollis S, Yates DW, Woodford M, et al.: Standardized comparison of performance indicators in trauma: a new approach to case-mix variation. J Trauma 38:763-766, 1995.
29. Hunter A, Kennedy L, Henry J, et al.: Application of neural networks and sensitivity analysis to improved prediction of trauma survival. Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine 62:11-19, 2000.
30. Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Osler TM, et al.: Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available. J Trauma 60:1002-1008, 2006. (Pubitemid 43778632)
31. Kohavi R: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection, in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 1995, pp. 1137-1145.
32. Kroezen F, Bijlsma TS, Liem MS, et al.: Base deficit-based predictive modeling of outcome in trauma patients admitted to intensive care units in Dutch trauma centers. J Trauma 63:908-913, 2007. (Pubitemid 350287315)
33. Millham FH, LaMorte WW, Millham FH, et al.: Factors associated with mortality in trauma: re-evaluation of the TRISS method using the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma 56:1090-1096, 2004. (Pubitemid 38788738)
34. Moore L, La voie A, Turgeon AF, et al.: The trauma risk adjustment model: a new model for evaluating trauma care. Annals of Surgery 249:1040-1046, 2009.
35. Osler T, Baker SP and Long W: A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma 43:922-925, 1997.
36. Palmer CS, Niggemeyer LE and Charman D: Double coding and mapping using Abbreviated Injury Scale 1998 and 2005: Identifying issues for trauma data. Injury 41:948-954, 2010.
37. Rabbani A, Moini M, Rabbani A, et al.: Application of "Trauma and Injury Severity Score" and "A Severity Characterization of Trauma" score to trauma patients in a setting different from "Major Trauma Outcome Study". Archives of Iranian Medicine 10:383-386, 2007. (Pubitemid 47162539)
38. Ridley S and Carter R: The effects of secondary transport on critically ill patients. Anaesthesia 44:822-827, 1989. (Pubitemid 19258290)
39. Sacco WJ, MacKenzie EJ, Champion HR, et al.: Comparison of alternative methods for assessing injury severity based on anatomic descriptors. J Trauma 47:441-446, 1999.
40. Salottolo K, Settell A, Uribe P, et al.: The impact of the AIS 2005 revision on injury severity scores and clinical outcome measures. Injury 40:999-1003, 2009.
41. Schluter PJ, Nathens A, Neal ML, et al.: Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. J Trauma 68:761-770, 2010.
42. Skaga NO, Eken T, Hestnes M, et al.: Scoring of anatomic injury after trauma: AIS 98 versus AIS 90-do the changes affect overall severity assessment? Injury 38:84-90, 2007. (Pubitemid 44969362)
43. Tohira H, Jacobs I, Mountain D, et al.: A modified mapping table for the Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 Updated in 2008 (AIS 2008) made better use of the existing injury data than the original table. Emergency Medicine Australasia 23:36, 2010.
44. Towler S: Trauma system and services: Report of the Trauma Working Group. Perth, Department of Health Western Australia, 2007.