Nest distribution of magpies Pica pica sericea as related to habitat connectivity in an urban environment

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 212-219

  Kang, Wanmo ^a   Lee, Dowon ^a   Park, Chan Ryul ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Forest Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Betweenness; Black billed magpie; Graph theory; Habitat connectivity

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; GRAPH THEORY;

ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS; BETWEENNESS; BLACK-BILLED MAGPIE; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; GRAPH THEORETICAL ANALYSIS; HABITAT CONNECTIVITY; LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITIES; RANDOMIZATION PROCEDURE;

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; CONNECTIVITY; FOREST COVER; FOREST EDGE; HABITAT CONSERVATION; LOGISTICS; NEST GUARDING; PASSERINE; THEORETICAL STUDY; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS; BIRDS; CONSERVATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTS;

CORVIDAE; PICA PICA; PICA PICA SERICEA;

EID: 83955164186     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on inference theory 1973, 267-281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary. B. Petrov, F. Czakil (Eds.).
2. Baguette M., Van Dyck H. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: Functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22(8):1117-1129.
3. Batagelj V., Mrvar A. Pajek 1.24. Software for large network analysis 2008, Available from http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/ (accessed January 2011).
4. Belisle M. Measuring landscape connectivity: The challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 2005, 86(8):1988-1995.
5. Birkhead T.R. The magpies 1991, Poyser, London.
6. Bodin ö., Norberg J. A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22(1):31-44.
7. Bodin ö., Tengo M., Norman A., Lundberg J., Elmqvist T. The value of small size: Loss of forest patches and ecological thresholds in southern Madagascar. Ecological Applications 2006, 16(2):440-451.
8. Bowerman B.L., O'Connell R.T. Linear statistical models: An applied approach 1990, Duxbury, Belmont, CA.
9. Brooks C.P. A scalar analysis of landscape connectivity. Oikos 2003, 102(2):433-439.
10. Bunn A., Urban D.L., Keitt T.H. Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management 2000, 59(4):265-278.
11. Burnham K., Anderson D. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach 2002, Springer, New York.
12. Calabrese J.M., Fagan W.F. A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2004, 2:529-536.
13. Clergeau P., Croci S., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.-L., Dinetti M. Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes. Biological Conservation 2006, 127(3):336-344.
14. Donnelly R., Marzluff J. Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosystems 2006, 9(2):99-117.
15. Eguchi K. Recent increase of nesting on utility poles by the black-billed magpie Pica pica sericea. Japanese Journal of Ornithology 1996, 45(2):101-107.
16. Estrada E., Bodin ö. Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecological Applications 2008, 18(7):1810-1825.
17. Fall A., Fortin M., Manseau M., O'Brien D. Spatial graphs: Principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems 2007, 10(3):448-461.
18. François C., Alexandre L., Julliard R. Effects of landscape urbanization on magpie occupancy dynamics in France. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23(5):527-538.
19. Freeman L. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1979, 1(3):215-239.
20. Goodwin B., Fahrig L. How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity?. Oikos 2002, 99(3):552-570.
21. Hanski I. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 1994, 63:151-162.
22. Hayes B. Graph theory in practice; part 1. American Scientist 2000, 88:9-13.
23. Hayes B. Graph theory in practice; part 2. American Scientist 2000, 88:104-109.
24. Jerzak L. Synurbanization of the magpie in the Palearctic. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world 2001, 403-425. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, R. Donnelly (Eds.).
25. Keitt T.H., Urban D.L., Milne B. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology 1997, 1:4.
26. Kim, S. (2004). The role of habitat composition on territory size variation and its effect on breeding success in the black-billed magpie (Pica pica sericea Gould). Master's Thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul.
27. Lookingbill T.R., Gardner R.H., Ferrari J.R., Keller C.E. Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity. Ecological Applications 2010, 20(2):427-441.
28. Marzluff J.M., McGowan K.J., Donnelly R., Knight R.L. Causes and consequences of expanding American Crow populations. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world 2001, 332-363. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, R. Donnelly (Eds.).
29. McKinney M.L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 2006, 127(3):247-260.
30. Merriam G. Movement in spatially divided populations: Responses to landscape structure. Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation 1995, 64-77. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. W.Z. Lidicker (Ed.).
31. Minor E.S., Urban D.L. Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. Ecological Applications 2007, 17(6):1771-1782.
32. Miranda-Moreno L.F., Morency P., El-Geneidy A.M. The link between built environment, pedestrian activity and pedestrian-vehicle collision occurrence at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011, 43(5):1624-1634.
33. Møller A.P. Characteristics of magpie Pica pica territories of varying duration. Ornis Scandinavica 1982, 13:94-100.
34. Møller A.P. Habitat selection and feeding activity in the Magpie Pica pica. Journal of Ornithology 1983, 124(2):147-161.
35. O'Brien D., Manseau M., Fall A., Fortin M. Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory. Biological Conservation 2006, 130(1):70-83.
36. Okabe A., Boots B., Sugihara K., Chin S.-N. Spatial tessellations: Concepts and applications of voronoi diagrams 2000, Wiley, Chichester, UK. 2nd ed.
37. Reese K., Kadlec J. Supplemental feeding: Possible negative effects on black-billed magpies. Journal of Wildlife Management 1984, 48(2):608-610.
38. Rhim S., Lee W., Eo S. Changes in behavior of black-billed magpie, Pica pica sericea between breeding and non-breeding season. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 2001, 15:99-103. (in Korean).
39. Roos, S. (2004). Nest predation processes and farmland birds: Habitat selection and population dynamics of predators and prey. Dissertation. University of Uppsala, Uppsala.
40. Saga Prefecture A report of the research on the ecology of the black-billed magpie in 1989 1990, Saga Prefecture, Saga, 27 pp. (in Japanese).
41. Soulé M.E. Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity 1986, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
42. StataCorp Stata statistical software: Release 10 2007, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX.
43. Takeishi M., Eguchi K. Nest-site characteristics in the black-billed magpies Pica pica sericea. Japanese Journal of Ornithology 1994, 42(2):53-59.
44. Tatner P. The diet of urban magpies Pica pica. Ibis 1983, 125(1):90-107.
45. Taylor P.D., Fahrig L., Henein K., Merriam G. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 1993, 68(3):571-573.
46. Tischendorf L., Fahrig L. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 2000, 90(1):7-19.
47. Turner P. Factors influencing the distribution of magpies Pica pica in an urban environment. Bird Study 1982, 29(3):227-234.
48. Urban D.L., Keitt T.H. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 2001, 82(5):1205-1218.
49. Urban D.L., Minor E.S., Treml E., Schick R. Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecology Letters 2009, 12(3):260-273.
50. van Langevelde F. Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations. Ecography 2000, 23(5):614-622.
51. Verbeylen G., De Bruyn L., Adriaensen F., Matthysen E. Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape?. Landscape Ecology 2003, 18(8):791-805.
52. Vines G. A socio-ecology of magpies Pica pica. Ibis 1981, 123(2):190-202.
53. Wang Y., Chen S., Jiang P., Ding P. Black-billed magpies (Pica pica) adjust nest characteristics to adapt to urbanization in Hangzhou, China. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2008, 86(7):676-684.
54. Wang Y.H., Yang K.C., Bridgman C.L., Lin L.K. Habitat suitability modelling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23(8):989-1000.